Improving young pig welfare on-farm: The Five Domains Model.
affective
farm
health
mental
piglet
weaner
Journal
Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jun 2022
01 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
20
04
2022
accepted:
06
05
2022
pubmed:
11
5
2022
medline:
22
6
2022
entrez:
10
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Considering welfare through the "neonatal and nursery pig perspective" is an exciting approach and one that resonates with consumers. Overlaying this with the Five Domains Model, as we suggest in this review, points to practical on-farm improvements that provide each pig the opportunity to experience positive mental states. The Five Domains Model is broken into physical and functional states, which include Domain 1: Nutrition, Domain 2: Physical Environment, Domain 3: Health, and Domain 4: Behavioral Interaction, and Domain 5: Mental State. The Five Domains Model can build on the breadth and depth of swine welfare science to highlight opportunities to improve welfare on-farm. In Domain 1, management of increasingly large litters is considered, with examples of sow vs. artificial rearing, colostrum quality and quantity, and creep feed management strategies. Efforts can result in positive mental states such as feeling full and content and the ability to experience the pleasure of drinking and food tastes and smells. Domain 2 considers space complexity and access to key resources, along with thermal and physical amenities, to promote feelings of physical comfort. Domain 3 considers pig health in three broads, yet inter-linking categories 1) congenital and hereditary health, 2) environmental pathogen load, and 3) colostrum quality and quantity, and its effect on the microbiome. Improvements can result in a pig that displays vitality and feels healthy. Domain 4 provides the pig opportunities to express its rich behavioral repertoire, specifically positive social interactions, play, and exploration. These efforts can result in pigs feeling calm, safe, comfortable, having companionship, engaged, interested, and rewarded. In conclusion, using the Five Domains Model can highlight numerous opportunities to improve current and future housing and management through the "neonatal and nursery pig perspective" with a focus on inducing positive mental states that can result in improved quality of life and welfare state. Considering welfare through the “neonatal and nursery pig perspective” is an exciting approach. Overlaying this with the Five Domains Model, as we suggest in this review, points to practical on-farm improvements that provide each pig the opportunity to experience positive mental states. The first four domains consider physical and functional states; with Domains 1 through 4 being Nutrition, Physical Environment, Health, and Behavioral Interaction, respectively. All interweave with Domain 5: Mental state. A plethora of examples are discussed; Domain 1 critiques optimal colostrum intake, and milk and feed quality that result in feelings of fullness and contentment. Domain 2 considers space complexity, key resource access, and thermal and physical amenities with these efforts resulting in feelings of comfort and agency. Domain 3 discusses congenital and hereditary health, environmental pathogen load, colostrum quality and quantity effects on the microbiome, and how these improve pig vitality and feelings of good health and fitness. Domain 4 discusses opportunities for the pig to express its behavioral repertoire, particularly positive social interactions, play, and exploration with feelings of control and agency. Improvements will result in pigs feeling calm, safe, comfortable, enjoying companionship, engaged, interested, and leading a rewarding life.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Considering welfare through the “neonatal and nursery pig perspective” is an exciting approach. Overlaying this with the Five Domains Model, as we suggest in this review, points to practical on-farm improvements that provide each pig the opportunity to experience positive mental states. The first four domains consider physical and functional states; with Domains 1 through 4 being Nutrition, Physical Environment, Health, and Behavioral Interaction, respectively. All interweave with Domain 5: Mental state. A plethora of examples are discussed; Domain 1 critiques optimal colostrum intake, and milk and feed quality that result in feelings of fullness and contentment. Domain 2 considers space complexity, key resource access, and thermal and physical amenities with these efforts resulting in feelings of comfort and agency. Domain 3 discusses congenital and hereditary health, environmental pathogen load, colostrum quality and quantity effects on the microbiome, and how these improve pig vitality and feelings of good health and fitness. Domain 4 discusses opportunities for the pig to express its behavioral repertoire, particularly positive social interactions, play, and exploration with feelings of control and agency. Improvements will result in pigs feeling calm, safe, comfortable, enjoying companionship, engaged, interested, and leading a rewarding life.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35536191
pii: 6583200
doi: 10.1093/jas/skac164
pmc: PMC9202571
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 7;7(1):7426
pubmed: 28784986
Physiol Behav. 1996 Aug;60(2):389-96
pubmed: 8840896
J Anim Sci. 2010 Jul;88(7):2265-76
pubmed: 20190163
Animals (Basel). 2020 Feb 27;10(3):
pubmed: 32120935
Animal. 2012 Jan;6(1):96-117
pubmed: 22436159
Prev Vet Med. 2014 Aug 1;115(3-4):181-90
pubmed: 24834805
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 22;14(7):e0219557
pubmed: 31329605
Animal. 2022 Feb;16(2):100446
pubmed: 35042138
Animal. 2007 Aug;1(7):1033-41
pubmed: 22444806
Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2015 Nov;172:17-25
pubmed: 26937060
Animals (Basel). 2016 May 24;6(6):
pubmed: 27231943
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2020 Mar;104(2):657-666
pubmed: 31872554
Animals (Basel). 2021 Sep 18;11(9):
pubmed: 34573697
Animals (Basel). 2016 Mar 14;6(3):
pubmed: 27102171
Animals (Basel). 2019 Aug 20;9(8):
pubmed: 31434257
Biol Neonate. 1981;40(3-4):167-74
pubmed: 7284502
J Anim Sci. 2006 Sep;84(9):2316-37
pubmed: 16908634
Animals (Basel). 2021 Aug 31;11(9):
pubmed: 34573529
Animals (Basel). 2019 Aug 15;9(8):
pubmed: 31443165
Animals (Basel). 2019 May 09;9(5):
pubmed: 31075904
Prev Vet Med. 1998 Jan;33(1-4):83-9
pubmed: 9500166
Front Nutr. 2021 Jul 09;8:686053
pubmed: 34307437
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2015 Nov;28(11):1519-24
pubmed: 26333669
Animal. 2011 Aug;5(10):1546-53
pubmed: 22440345
J Anim Sci. 1983 Dec;57(6):1406-11
pubmed: 6674280
Animal. 2019 Mar;13(3):590-599
pubmed: 29991377
Animal. 2022 Jun;16 Suppl 2:100378
pubmed: 34697006
Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 09;10(10):
pubmed: 33050195
Behav Brain Res. 2006 Nov 25;175(1):1-8
pubmed: 16970997
Animal. 2014 Mar;8(3):448-60
pubmed: 24534691
Horm Behav. 2007 Jun;52(1):78-85
pubmed: 17482189
Neurobiol Stress. 2017 Mar 19;7:124-136
pubmed: 29276734
Animals (Basel). 2019 Jul 31;9(8):
pubmed: 31370345
Porcine Health Manag. 2018 Dec 14;4:30
pubmed: 30564434
Animal. 2011 Aug;5(10):1605-12
pubmed: 22440352
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 16;11(1):24113
pubmed: 34916559
Transl Anim Sci. 2020 May 21;4(2):txaa068
pubmed: 32705063
Animal. 2016 Mar;10(3):478-89
pubmed: 26567800
Animal. 2020 Apr;14(4):824-833
pubmed: 31650940
Animals (Basel). 2019 Jul 13;9(7):
pubmed: 31337042
J Anim Sci. 2016 Apr;94(4):1633-43
pubmed: 27136022
Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 14;10(10):
pubmed: 33066335
Vet Rec. 2000 Aug 19;147(8):209-14
pubmed: 10994922
Animals (Basel). 2017 Aug 09;7(8):
pubmed: 28792485
Animals (Basel). 2020 Nov 05;10(11):
pubmed: 33167360
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Nov 09;7:590867
pubmed: 33240961
J Anim Sci. 2007 Feb;85(2):556-65
pubmed: 17235038
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 10;12(1):2318
pubmed: 35145195
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Feb 26;8:609883
pubmed: 33718467
J Anim Sci. 2016 May;94(5):2151-9
pubmed: 27285711
Animal. 2019 Jul;13(S1):s26-s34
pubmed: 31280746
Vet Res. 2017 Nov 10;48(1):75
pubmed: 29126442
Animal. 2011 Aug;5(9):1426-31
pubmed: 22440289
Animal. 2021 Jul;15(7):100273
pubmed: 34171569
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Mar 12;8:601394
pubmed: 33778032
Transl Anim Sci. 2018 Jul 25;2(3):254-262
pubmed: 32704709
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2017 Jan 26;8:12
pubmed: 28149511
Transl Anim Sci. 2018 Feb 23;2(1):50-61
pubmed: 32289106
Animal. 2017 Jul;11(7):1210-1221
pubmed: 27917741
Transl Anim Sci. 2020 Nov 18;5(1):txaa208
pubmed: 33458596
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2017 Jan 28;8:14
pubmed: 28149513
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Mar 17;7:140
pubmed: 32258069
Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2018 Oct;65:67-70
pubmed: 30007130
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Mar 17;9:811810
pubmed: 35372543
Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Sep 18;50(1):46
pubmed: 30227828
Animals (Basel). 2016 Sep 23;6(10):
pubmed: 27669313
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 08;11(9):e0161832
pubmed: 27606818
Behav Processes. 1988 Sep;17(3):205-16
pubmed: 24897547
Animal. 2019 Aug;13(8):1696-1703
pubmed: 30604656
J Anim Sci. 2017 Feb;95(2):949-957
pubmed: 28380586
J Anim Sci. 2010 Nov;88(11):3554-62
pubmed: 20622185
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Jun 06;5:123
pubmed: 29928648
Physiol Behav. 2015 Nov 1;151:162-7
pubmed: 26130444
Anim Cogn. 2019 Sep;22(5):657-671
pubmed: 31049725
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jun 11;11:917
pubmed: 32595608
Animal. 2019 Oct;13(10):2327-2335
pubmed: 30869063
mSphere. 2021 Oct 27;6(5):e0066321
pubmed: 34494881
Animals (Basel). 2018 Oct 29;8(11):
pubmed: 30380594
Reprod Nutr Dev. 2001 Jul-Aug;41(4):321-32
pubmed: 11789889
J Anim Sci. 2017 Jan;95(1):353-360
pubmed: 28177391
J Anim Sci. 2020 Mar 1;98(3):
pubmed: 32005996
Porcine Health Manag. 2016 May 1;2:9
pubmed: 28405435
Sci Rep. 2021 May 12;11(1):10130
pubmed: 33980959
Anim Nutr. 2022 Mar;8(1):169-184
pubmed: 34977387
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 05;10(8):e0133408
pubmed: 26244335
Animal. 2022 Jun;16 Suppl 2:100350
pubmed: 34801424
Vet J. 2013 Nov;198(2):508-12
pubmed: 24268483
Mol Reprod Dev. 2017 Sep;84(9):897-904
pubmed: 28661576
Gut Microbes. 2020 May 3;11(3):310-334
pubmed: 31760878
Res Vet Sci. 1967 Apr;8(2):175-86
pubmed: 6040642
J Nutr. 1997 Jun;127(6):1061-7
pubmed: 9187618
Q J Exp Physiol. 1986 Jul;71(3):361-79
pubmed: 3532162