A Mobile App for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Development and Usability Study.

behavior change intervention cardiovascular disease diabetes mellitus, type 2 health promotion mobile health mobile phone primary prevention

Journal

JMIR human factors
ISSN: 2292-9495
Titre abrégé: JMIR Hum Factors
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101666561

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 May 2022
Historique:
received: 19 11 2021
accepted: 26 03 2022
revised: 26 02 2022
entrez: 10 5 2022
pubmed: 11 5 2022
medline: 11 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are posing a huge burden on health care systems worldwide. Mobile apps can deliver behavior change interventions for chronic disease prevention on a large scale, but current evidence for their effectiveness is limited. This paper reported on the development and user testing of a mobile app that aims at increasing risk awareness and engaging users in behavior change. It would form part of an intervention for primary prevention of CVD and T2DM. The theoretical framework of the app design was based on the Behaviour Change Wheel, combined with the capability, opportunity, and motivation for behavior change system and the behavior change techniques from the Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (version 1). In addition, evidence from scientific literature has guided the development process. The prototype was tested for user-friendliness via an iterative approach. We conducted semistructured interviews with individuals in the target populations, which included the System Usability Scale. We transcribed and analyzed the interviews using descriptive statistics for the System Usability Scale and thematic analysis to identify app features that improved utility and usability. The target population was Australians aged ≥45 years. The app included 4 core modules (risk score, goal setting, health measures, and education). In these modules, users learned about their risk for CVD and T2DM; set goals for smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, and physical activity; and tracked them. In total, we included 12 behavior change techniques. We conducted 2 rounds of usability testing, each involving 5 participants. The average age of the participants was 58 (SD 8) years. Totally, 60% (6/10) of the participants owned iPhone Operating System phones, and 40% (4/10) of them owned Android phones. In the first round, we identified a technical issue that prevented 30% (3/10) of the participants from completing the registration process. Among the 70% (7/10) of participants who were able to complete the registration process, 71% (5/7) rated the app above average, based on the System Usability Scale. During the interviews, we identified some issues related to functionality, content, and language and clarity. We used the participants' feedback to improve these aspects. We developed the app using behavior change theory and scientific evidence. The user testing allowed us to identify and remove technical errors and integrate additional functions into the app, which the participants had requested. Next, we will evaluate the feasibility of the revised version of the app developed through this design process and usability testing.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are posing a huge burden on health care systems worldwide. Mobile apps can deliver behavior change interventions for chronic disease prevention on a large scale, but current evidence for their effectiveness is limited.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This paper reported on the development and user testing of a mobile app that aims at increasing risk awareness and engaging users in behavior change. It would form part of an intervention for primary prevention of CVD and T2DM.
METHODS METHODS
The theoretical framework of the app design was based on the Behaviour Change Wheel, combined with the capability, opportunity, and motivation for behavior change system and the behavior change techniques from the Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (version 1). In addition, evidence from scientific literature has guided the development process. The prototype was tested for user-friendliness via an iterative approach. We conducted semistructured interviews with individuals in the target populations, which included the System Usability Scale. We transcribed and analyzed the interviews using descriptive statistics for the System Usability Scale and thematic analysis to identify app features that improved utility and usability.
RESULTS RESULTS
The target population was Australians aged ≥45 years. The app included 4 core modules (risk score, goal setting, health measures, and education). In these modules, users learned about their risk for CVD and T2DM; set goals for smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, and physical activity; and tracked them. In total, we included 12 behavior change techniques. We conducted 2 rounds of usability testing, each involving 5 participants. The average age of the participants was 58 (SD 8) years. Totally, 60% (6/10) of the participants owned iPhone Operating System phones, and 40% (4/10) of them owned Android phones. In the first round, we identified a technical issue that prevented 30% (3/10) of the participants from completing the registration process. Among the 70% (7/10) of participants who were able to complete the registration process, 71% (5/7) rated the app above average, based on the System Usability Scale. During the interviews, we identified some issues related to functionality, content, and language and clarity. We used the participants' feedback to improve these aspects.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We developed the app using behavior change theory and scientific evidence. The user testing allowed us to identify and remove technical errors and integrate additional functions into the app, which the participants had requested. Next, we will evaluate the feasibility of the revised version of the app developed through this design process and usability testing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35536603
pii: v9i2e35065
doi: 10.2196/35065
pmc: PMC9131155
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e35065

Informations de copyright

©Vera Helen Buss, Marlien Varnfield, Mark Harris, Margo Barr. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 10.05.2022.

Références

J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 19;21(3):e12053
pubmed: 30888321
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 May-Jun;26(3):741-8
pubmed: 17485752
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 04;20(5):e162
pubmed: 29728346
Digit Health. 2020 Mar 24;6:2055207620914427
pubmed: 32269830
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Sep;75(9):1922-1932
pubmed: 30786051
Obes Rev. 2021 Jul;22 Suppl 4:e13258
pubmed: 33949778
Proc Nutr Soc. 2015 May;74(2):164-70
pubmed: 25998679
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Jun 29;3(2):e73
pubmed: 26123578
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):696-713
pubmed: 17873259
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jul;12(4):831-838
pubmed: 29584454
Am Heart J. 1991 Jan;121(1 Pt 2):293-8
pubmed: 1985385
Heart. 2014 Nov;100(22):1770-9
pubmed: 24973083
Addiction. 2020 Nov;115(11):2008-2020
pubmed: 32196796
BMJ. 2002 Apr 6;324(7341):827-30
pubmed: 11934777
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 21;21(6):e14265
pubmed: 31228174
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Aug;101(8):1410-1418
pubmed: 29559200
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 29;22(10):e21159
pubmed: 33118936
Hum Factors. 2017 Jun;59(4):582-627
pubmed: 28192674
Health Psychol Rev. 2021 Mar;15(1):51-55
pubmed: 32608326
Am J Health Promot. 2004 Nov-Dec;19(2):81-93
pubmed: 15559708
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Sep 20;12:76-84
pubmed: 30294699
Nutr Diabetes. 2016 Sep 19;6(9):e231
pubmed: 27643726
Obes Rev. 2019 Oct;20(10):1465-1484
pubmed: 31353783
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Nov 30;13:126-131
pubmed: 30568871
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013 Nov;1(3):191-8
pubmed: 24622367
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1223-1249
pubmed: 33069327
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Mar 18;8(3):e17046
pubmed: 32186518
BMJ. 2001 Mar 31;322(7289):757-63
pubmed: 11282859
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jan 17;6(1):e23
pubmed: 29343463
Ann Behav Med. 2019 Feb 1;53(2):180-195
pubmed: 29750240
Ann Behav Med. 2011 Apr;41(2):208-26
pubmed: 21132416
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 May 1;27(5):677-689
pubmed: 31999316
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Oct 7;17(1):127
pubmed: 33028335
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Aug 1;25(8):1036-1046
pubmed: 29762686
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Oct 5;4(1):144
pubmed: 34611287
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1789-1858
pubmed: 30496104
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Jan;4(1):52-63
pubmed: 26653067
Med J Aust. 2010 Feb 15;192(4):197-202
pubmed: 20170456
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 5;13(1):e0189801
pubmed: 29304148
J Behav Med. 2017 Feb;40(1):194-202
pubmed: 27785652
Am J Prev Med. 1998 Nov;15(4):413-30
pubmed: 9838981
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Mar 18;17(3):
pubmed: 28335475
Diabetes Care. 2016 Aug;39(8):1364-70
pubmed: 26861922
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Mar 08;15(3):e51
pubmed: 23475457
Am Psychol. 2002 Sep;57(9):705-17
pubmed: 12237980
Transl Behav Med. 2016 Dec;6(4):533-545
pubmed: 27699682
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Mar 1;8(2):212-224
pubmed: 29381786
Prev Med. 2017 Dec;105:404-411
pubmed: 28887192
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Nov-Dec;13(6):608-18
pubmed: 16929039
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 25;9:CD011479
pubmed: 28944453
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 May;23(5):358-366
pubmed: 33210954
Proc Int World Wide Web Conf. 2019 May;2019:571-582
pubmed: 32368761
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 May 06;13:57
pubmed: 27151280
N Engl J Med. 2001 May 3;344(18):1343-50
pubmed: 11333990
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 02;19(8):e281
pubmed: 28768610
Nutrients. 2020 Jul 22;12(8):
pubmed: 32708000
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017 Jan-Feb;57(1-2):90-102
pubmed: 26364690
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Oct 23;17(10):e240
pubmed: 26499966
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2017 Jul/Aug;34(4):283-294
pubmed: 28376666
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Sep 10;3:117
pubmed: 32964140
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Sep;71(9):2200-7
pubmed: 25879395
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Feb;20(2):274-281
pubmed: 27572276
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999;(25):149-63
pubmed: 10854471
N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 7;346(6):393-403
pubmed: 11832527
BMJ. 2003 Sep 27;327(7417):741-4
pubmed: 14512488
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Aug 12;7(8):e11575
pubmed: 30903746
Science. 2011 Sep 9;333(6048):1393-400
pubmed: 21903802
Health Educ Res. 2007 Aug;22(4):532-8
pubmed: 17032703
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Dec;96:24-37
pubmed: 26847070
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2):223-37
pubmed: 26033349
Prev Med. 2015 Dec;81:16-41
pubmed: 26190368

Auteurs

Vera Helen Buss (VH)

Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Herston, Australia.
Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Marlien Varnfield (M)

Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Herston, Australia.

Mark Harris (M)

Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Margo Barr (M)

Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Classifications MeSH