The biomechanical fundamentals of crosslink-augmentation in posterior spinal instrumentation.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 05 2022
10 05 2022
Historique:
received:
03
01
2022
accepted:
13
04
2022
entrez:
10
5
2022
pubmed:
11
5
2022
medline:
14
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Posterior screw-rod constructs can be used to stabilize spinal segments; however, the stiffness is not absolute, and some motion can persist. While the effect of crosslink-augmentation has been evaluated in multiple studies, the fundamental explanation of their effectiveness has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to quantify the parameters "screw rotation" and "parallelogram deformation" in posterior instrumentations with and without crosslinks to analyze and explain their fundamental effect. Biomechanical testing of 15 posteriorly instrumented human spinal segments (Th10/11-L4/L5) was conducted in axial rotation, lateral bending, and flexion-extension with ± 7.5 Nm. Screw rotation and parallelogram deformation were compared for both configurations. Parallelogram deformation occurred predominantly during axial rotation (2.6°) and was reduced by 60% (-1.45°, p = 0.02) by the addition of a crosslink. Simultaneously, screw rotation (0.56°) was reduced by 48% (-0.27°, p = 0.02) in this loading condition. During lateral bending, 0.38° of parallelogram deformation and 1.44° of screw rotation was measured and no significant reduction was achieved by crosslink-augmentation (8%, -0.03°, -p = 0.3 and -13%, -0.19°, p = 0.7 respectively). During flexion-extension, parallelogram deformation was 0.4° and screw rotation was 0.39° and crosslink-augmentation had no significant effect on these values (-0.12°, -30%, p = 0.5 and -0°, -0%, p = 0.8 respectively). In axial rotation, crosslink-augmentation can reduce parallelogram deformation and with that, screw rotation. In lateral bending and flexion-extension parallelogram deformation is minimal and crosslink-augmentation has no significant effect. Since the relatively large screw rotation in lateral bending is not caused by parallelogram deformation, crosslink-augmentation is no adequate countermeasure. The fundamental understanding of the biomechanical effect of crosslink-augmentation helps better understand its potential and limitations in increasing construct stiffness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35538122
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11719-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-11719-2
pmc: PMC9090827
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7621Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Eur Spine J. 2017 Nov;26(11):2865-2872
pubmed: 28260125
Spine J. 2009 May;9(5):366-73
pubmed: 18790684
Unfallchirurgie. 1988 Feb;14(1):50-5
pubmed: 3363749
Spine J. 2020 Oct;20(10):1705-1716
pubmed: 32474224
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Aug 1;40(15):E873-8
pubmed: 26222663
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Jun 15;18(8):983-91
pubmed: 8367786
J Biomech. 2020 Jan 2;98:109467
pubmed: 31711610
Spine J. 2019 Dec;19(12):1995-2002
pubmed: 31254651
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Aug 15;46(16):E869-E877
pubmed: 33337686
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 11;16(6):e0253076
pubmed: 34115816
J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Apr;50:183-189
pubmed: 29402565
Spine J. 2013 Nov;13(11):1485-92
pubmed: 23800823
Spine Deform. 2015 Jul;3(4):338-344
pubmed: 27927479
Eur Spine J. 2021 Jan;30(1):34-49
pubmed: 33009949