World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) Guideline update - XIV - Recommendations on CMA immunotherapy.
GRADE
Immunotherapy
Milk allergy
Practice guidelines
Journal
The World Allergy Organization journal
ISSN: 1939-4551
Titre abrégé: World Allergy Organ J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101481283
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
13
09
2021
revised:
24
02
2022
accepted:
17
03
2022
entrez:
11
5
2022
pubmed:
12
5
2022
medline:
12
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The prevalence of cow's milk allergy (CMA) is approximately 2-4.5% in infants and less than 0.5% in adults. Most children outgrow cow's milk allergy in early childhood, particularly that to the baked milk products. Immunotherapy with unheated cow's milk has been used as a treatment option for those who have not yet outgrown CMA, but the benefits must be balanced with the adverse effects. These evidence-based guidelines from the World Allergy Organization (WAO) intend to support patients, clinicians, and others in decisions about the use of oral and epicutaneous immunotherapy for the treatment of IgE-mediated CMA. WAO formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to include the views of all stakeholders and to minimize potential biases from competing interests. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline-development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, which were subject to public comment. After a careful review of the summarized evidence and thorough discussions the WAO guideline panel suggests: a) using oral immunotherapy with unheated cow's milk in those individuals with confirmed IgE-mediated CMA who value the ability to consume controlled quantities of milk more than avoiding the large adverse effects of therapy, b) not using oral immunotherapy with unheated cow's milk in those who value avoiding large adverse effects of therapy more than the ability to consume controlled quantities of milk, c) using omalizumab in those starting oral immunotherapy with unheated cow's milk, d) not using oral immunotherapy with baked cow's milk in those who do not tolerate both unheated and baked milk, and e) not using epicutaneous immunotherapy outside of a research setting. The recommendations are labeled "conditional" due to the low certainty about the health effects based on the available evidence. Clinicians, patients, and their family members might want to discuss all the potential desirable and undesirable effects of oral immunotherapy for IgE-mediated CMA and integrate them with the patients' values and preferences before deciding on a treatment option. More robust research is needed to determine with greater certainty which interventions are likely to be the most beneficial with the least harms, and to develop safer, low-cost, and equitable treatments.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
The prevalence of cow's milk allergy (CMA) is approximately 2-4.5% in infants and less than 0.5% in adults. Most children outgrow cow's milk allergy in early childhood, particularly that to the baked milk products. Immunotherapy with unheated cow's milk has been used as a treatment option for those who have not yet outgrown CMA, but the benefits must be balanced with the adverse effects.
Objective
UNASSIGNED
These evidence-based guidelines from the World Allergy Organization (WAO) intend to support patients, clinicians, and others in decisions about the use of oral and epicutaneous immunotherapy for the treatment of IgE-mediated CMA.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
WAO formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to include the views of all stakeholders and to minimize potential biases from competing interests. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline-development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, which were subject to public comment.
Results
UNASSIGNED
After a careful review of the summarized evidence and thorough discussions the WAO guideline panel suggests: a) using oral immunotherapy with unheated cow's milk in those individuals with confirmed IgE-mediated CMA who value the ability to consume controlled quantities of milk more than avoiding the large adverse effects of therapy, b) not using oral immunotherapy with unheated cow's milk in those who value avoiding large adverse effects of therapy more than the ability to consume controlled quantities of milk, c) using omalizumab in those starting oral immunotherapy with unheated cow's milk, d) not using oral immunotherapy with baked cow's milk in those who do not tolerate both unheated and baked milk, and e) not using epicutaneous immunotherapy outside of a research setting. The recommendations are labeled "conditional" due to the low certainty about the health effects based on the available evidence.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Clinicians, patients, and their family members might want to discuss all the potential desirable and undesirable effects of oral immunotherapy for IgE-mediated CMA and integrate them with the patients' values and preferences before deciding on a treatment option. More robust research is needed to determine with greater certainty which interventions are likely to be the most beneficial with the least harms, and to develop safer, low-cost, and equitable treatments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35539896
doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100646
pii: S1939-4551(22)00022-9
pmc: PMC9061625
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100646Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors.
Références
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Mar;139(3):873-881.e8
pubmed: 27609658
Lancet. 2019 Jun 1;393(10187):2222-2232
pubmed: 31030987
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2010 Dec;21(8):1127-34
pubmed: 20444157
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1294-302
pubmed: 21803546
Clin Exp Allergy. 2019 Oct;49(10):1328-1341
pubmed: 31329313
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Apr;123(4):883-8
pubmed: 19232704
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Mar;131(3):805-12
pubmed: 23273958
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2014 May 12;10(1):25
pubmed: 24860608
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Dec;132(6):1368-74
pubmed: 24176117
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1277-82
pubmed: 21802904
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):401-6
pubmed: 21208779
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Jan;107(1):191-3
pubmed: 11150011
BMJ. 2016 Jun 28;353:i2016
pubmed: 27353417
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jan;81:101-110
pubmed: 27713072
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):395-400
pubmed: 21194891
World Allergy Organ J. 2022 Apr 23;15(4):100646
pubmed: 35539896
CMAJ. 2014 Feb 18;186(3):E123-42
pubmed: 24344144
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Sep;142(3):865-875
pubmed: 29908992
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Jun;127(6):1622-4
pubmed: 21546071
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2017;27(4):225-237
pubmed: 28731411
BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6
pubmed: 18436948
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Oct 6;163(7):548-53
pubmed: 26436619
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Apr;119(4):1016-8
pubmed: 17306354
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020 Mar 18;16:20
pubmed: 32206067
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;66(2):173-83
pubmed: 23116689
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Aug;101(2):166-73
pubmed: 18727472
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1311-6
pubmed: 21802902
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2016 Aug;27(5):544-6
pubmed: 27003835
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2020 May;31(4):364-370
pubmed: 31943363
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Nov;120(5):1172-7
pubmed: 17935766
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1283-93
pubmed: 21839614
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Nov;134(5):1016-25.e43
pubmed: 25174862
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2019 Jun;30(4):415-422
pubmed: 30770574
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Apr 3;156(7):525-31
pubmed: 22473437
Allergy. 2015 Aug;70(8):963-72
pubmed: 25864712
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;66(2):158-72
pubmed: 22609141
World Allergy Organ J. 2019 Dec 02;12(11):100089
pubmed: 31871534
World Allergy Organ J. 2010 Apr;3(4):57-161
pubmed: 23268426
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 May;125(5):1165-7
pubmed: 20451043
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Dec;136(6):1601-1606
pubmed: 26194541
Allergy. 2014 Oct;69(10):1397-404
pubmed: 24989080
BMJ. 2016 Jun 30;353:i2089
pubmed: 27365494
Clin Exp Allergy. 2012 Mar;42(3):363-74
pubmed: 22356141
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 22;379(21):1991-2001
pubmed: 30449234
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Apr;137(4):1103-1110.e11
pubmed: 26581915
Ital J Pediatr. 2019 Jan 14;45(1):13
pubmed: 30642367
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Sep;120(3):638-46
pubmed: 17628647
Clin Exp Allergy. 2010 Feb;40(2):251-6
pubmed: 19958365
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 12;7(1):17453
pubmed: 29234055
Allergy. 2018 Apr;73(4):799-815
pubmed: 29205393
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Apr;135(4):956-963.e1
pubmed: 25468198
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1303-10
pubmed: 21802903
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94
pubmed: 21195583
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Jan 21;7:27-38
pubmed: 31193674
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Feb;3(2):85-94
pubmed: 29242014
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):407-15
pubmed: 21247734