Generation and use of functionalised hydrogels that can rapidly sample infected surfaces.
Amphotericin elisa
Contact lens
Highly branched polymers
Medical device
Pathogen diagnosis
Polymyxin elisa
Specificity
Journal
MethodsX
ISSN: 2215-0161
Titre abrégé: MethodsX
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101639829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
09
12
2021
accepted:
28
03
2022
entrez:
11
5
2022
pubmed:
12
5
2022
medline:
12
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This paper outlined our method for developing polymer-linked contact lens type materials for rapid detection and differentiation of Gram-positive, Gram-negative bacteria and fungi in infected corneas. It can be applied to both model synthetic or ex-vivo corneal models and has been successfully trialed in an initial efficacy tested animal study. First a hydrogel substrate for the swab material is selected, we have demonstrated selective swabs using a glycerol monomethacrylate hydrogel. Alternatively any commercial material with carboxylic acid functional groups is suitable but risks nonspecific adhesion. This is then functionalised via use of N-hydroxysuccinimide reaction with amine groups on the specified highly branched polymer ligand (either individually gram negative, gram positive or fungal binding polymers or a combination of all three can be employed for desired sensing application). The hydrogel is then cut into swabs suitable for sampling, used, and then the presence of gram positive, game negative and fungi are disclosed by the sequential addition of dyes (fluorescent vancomycin, fluorescein isothiocyanate and calcofluor white). In summary this method presents: Method to produce glycerol monomethacrylate hydrogels to minimize nonspecific binding Methods of attaching pathogen binding highly branched polymers to produce selective hydrogel swabs Method for disclosing bound pathogens to this swab using sequential dye addition.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35540105
doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101684
pii: S2215-0161(22)00068-1
pmc: PMC9078998
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101684Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
We gratefully acknowledge support for this research by the 10.13039/100010269Wellcome Trust which provided funding for Swift, Pinnock and Shivshetty (Grant 0998800/B/12/Z).
Références
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jan;157(1):56-62
pubmed: 24200232
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004 Sep;10(9):773-6
pubmed: 15355406
Br J Ophthalmol. 1997 Nov;81(11):965-71
pubmed: 9505820
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):61-9
pubmed: 17464852
Anal Chim Acta. 2021 Feb 15;1146:41-52
pubmed: 33461718
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul-Aug;57(4):273-9
pubmed: 19574694
Cornea. 2018 Dec;37(12):1555-1560
pubmed: 30234680
Int Ophthalmol. 2015 Jun;35(3):341-6
pubmed: 24789079
Br J Ophthalmol. 1997 Aug;81(8):622-3
pubmed: 9349145
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2014 Jul-Sep;32(3):310-4
pubmed: 25008827
Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:507-21
pubmed: 19789660
Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2013 Dec 1;1(4):
pubmed: 24416712
Exp Eye Res. 2022 Jan;214:108881
pubmed: 34871569