Interpretation of cell mechanical experiments in microfluidic systems depend on the choice of cellular shape descriptors.
Journal
Biomicrofluidics
ISSN: 1932-1058
Titre abrégé: Biomicrofluidics
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101293825
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
09
01
2022
accepted:
17
03
2022
entrez:
11
5
2022
pubmed:
12
5
2022
medline:
12
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The capability to parameterize shapes is of essential importance in biomechanics to identify cells, to track their motion, and to quantify deformation. While various shape descriptors have already been investigated to study the morphology and migration of adherent cells, little is known of how the mathematical definition of a contour impacts the outcome of rheological experiments on cells in suspension. In microfluidic systems, hydrodynamic stress distributions induce time-dependent cell deformation that needs to be quantified to determine viscoelastic properties. Here, we compared nine different shape descriptors to characterize the deformation of suspended cells in an extensional as well as shear flow using dynamic real-time deformability cytometry. While stress relaxation depends on the amplitude and duration of stress, our results demonstrate that steady-state deformation can be predicted from single cell traces even for translocation times shorter than their characteristic time. Implementing an analytical simulation, performing experiments, and testing various data analysis strategies, we compared single cell and ensemble studies to address the question of computational costs vs experimental accuracy. Results indicate that high-throughput viscoelastic measurements of cells in suspension can be performed on an ensemble scale as long as the characteristic time matches the dimensions of the microfluidic system. Finally, we introduced a score to evaluate the shape descriptor-dependent effect size for cell deformation after cytoskeletal modifications. We provide evidence that single cell analysis in an extensional flow provides the highest sensitivity independent of shape parametrization, while inverse Haralick's circularity is mostly applicable to study cells in shear flow.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35541026
doi: 10.1063/5.0084673
pii: 5.0084673
pmc: PMC9054269
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
024109Informations de copyright
© 2022 Author(s).
Références
J Biomech. 2010 Jan 19;43(2):349-54
pubmed: 19772964
Lab Chip. 2020 Jun 30;20(13):2306-2316
pubmed: 32458864
J Lab Autom. 2012 Feb;17(1):32-42
pubmed: 22357606
Nature. 2008 May 22;453(7194):475-80
pubmed: 18497816
Biophys J. 2019 Jul 9;117(1):14-24
pubmed: 31235179
Nat Methods. 2018 May;15(5):355-358
pubmed: 29608556
Nat Methods. 2015 Mar;12(3):199-202, 4 p following 202
pubmed: 25643151
ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2017 Nov 13;3(11):2962-2973
pubmed: 33418716
J Biomech Eng. 2002 Aug;124(4):408-21
pubmed: 12188207
J Biomed Opt. 2017 Dec;22(12):1-28
pubmed: 29275544
Anal Chem. 2012 Aug 7;84(15):6438-43
pubmed: 22746217
Biomed Microdevices. 2009 Oct;11(5):1021-7
pubmed: 19434498
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2009;41(3):169-77
pubmed: 19276514
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 15;109(20):7630-5
pubmed: 22547795
Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 24;10(1):415
pubmed: 30679420
Micromachines (Basel). 2018 Mar 27;9(4):
pubmed: 30424085
Elife. 2018 Jan 13;7:
pubmed: 29331015
Development. 2017 Dec 1;144(23):4313-4321
pubmed: 29183942
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Apr 18;114(16):4225-4230
pubmed: 28373555
Integr Biol (Camb). 2016 May 16;8(5):616-23
pubmed: 26980074
Physiol Rep. 2022 Feb;10(3):e15171
pubmed: 35166060
Nat Mater. 2014 Jun;13(6):638-644
pubmed: 24747782
Nat Methods. 2020 Jun;17(6):587-593
pubmed: 32341544
Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 2017 Aug;74(8):283-296
pubmed: 28445605
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2015;17:35-62
pubmed: 26194428
J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016 Jul;10(7):539-53
pubmed: 25757807
Biophys J. 2017 Oct 3;113(7):1574-1584
pubmed: 28978449
Lab Chip. 2020 Aug 21;20(16):2927-2936
pubmed: 32648561
Biophys J. 2015 Nov 17;109(10):2023-36
pubmed: 26588562
Biomicrofluidics. 2018 Jun 04;12(4):042214
pubmed: 29937952
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45237
pubmed: 23028868