Sensitivity of the Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (PACC), PACC5, and Repeatable Battery for Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) to Amyloid Status in Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease -Atabecestat Phase 2b/3 EARLY Clinical Trial.
Amyloid
PACC
RBANS
cognition
preclinical AD
Journal
The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease
ISSN: 2426-0266
Titre abrégé: J Prev Alzheimers Dis
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101638820
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
entrez:
11
5
2022
pubmed:
12
5
2022
medline:
14
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cognitive composites commonly serve as primary outcomes in Alzheimer's disease (AD) secondary prevention trials. To evaluate the association between amyloid (Aβ) burden level (+/-) and performance on three separate composite endpoints: Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (PACC), PACC+Semantic Fluency (PACC5), and Repeatable Battery for Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). Screening data from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b/3 atabecestat EARLY study in preclinical AD participants were used in this analysis. The EARLY study was conducted at 143 centers across 14 countries. 3,569 cognitively unimpaired older adults (Clinical Dementia Rating of 0; aged 60-85 years) screened for inclusion in the EARLY study with Aβ status and at least PACC or RBANS at screening were included. Participants were categorized as those with non-pathological Aβ levels (Aβ-, n=2,824) and those with pathological Aβ levels (Aβ+, n=745) based on florbetapir uptake or levels of cerebrospinal fluid Aβ1-42. Analysis of Covariance models controlling for age, sex, and education were used to examine the difference in PACC, PACC5, and RBANS between Aβ groups. Nonparametric bootstrap was used to compare sensitivity of composites to differentiate between Aβ status. Of 3,569 participants, 2,116 were women (59%); 3,006 were Caucasian (84%); mean (SD) age was 68.98 (5.28) years. Aβ+ participants performed worse versus Aβ- participants on all cognitive composites though the magnitude of the Aβ effect was generally small. The Aβ+/- effect size for the PACC (Cohen's d=-0.15) was significantly greater than the RBANS (d=-0.097) while the PACC5 effect size (d=-0.139) was numerically larger than the RBANS. When examining subscores from the composites, memory tests (i.e., Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test, Figure Recall) and speed of processing (i.e., Digit-Symbol/Coding on the PACC/RBANS) exhibited the largest Aβ+/- effect sizes. Cross-sectional relationships between Aβ and cognition among clinically unimpaired older adults are detectable on multi-domain cognitive composites but are relatively small in magnitude. The Aβ+/- group effect was statistically larger for PACC and marginally larger for PACC5 versus RBANS. However, interpretation of composite sensitivity to Aβ status cross-sectionally cannot be generalized to sensitivity to change over time.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Cognitive composites commonly serve as primary outcomes in Alzheimer's disease (AD) secondary prevention trials.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the association between amyloid (Aβ) burden level (+/-) and performance on three separate composite endpoints: Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (PACC), PACC+Semantic Fluency (PACC5), and Repeatable Battery for Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).
DESIGN
Screening data from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b/3 atabecestat EARLY study in preclinical AD participants were used in this analysis.
SETTING
The EARLY study was conducted at 143 centers across 14 countries.
PARTICIPANTS
3,569 cognitively unimpaired older adults (Clinical Dementia Rating of 0; aged 60-85 years) screened for inclusion in the EARLY study with Aβ status and at least PACC or RBANS at screening were included. Participants were categorized as those with non-pathological Aβ levels (Aβ-, n=2,824) and those with pathological Aβ levels (Aβ+, n=745) based on florbetapir uptake or levels of cerebrospinal fluid Aβ1-42.
MEASUREMENTS
Analysis of Covariance models controlling for age, sex, and education were used to examine the difference in PACC, PACC5, and RBANS between Aβ groups. Nonparametric bootstrap was used to compare sensitivity of composites to differentiate between Aβ status.
RESULTS
Of 3,569 participants, 2,116 were women (59%); 3,006 were Caucasian (84%); mean (SD) age was 68.98 (5.28) years. Aβ+ participants performed worse versus Aβ- participants on all cognitive composites though the magnitude of the Aβ effect was generally small. The Aβ+/- effect size for the PACC (Cohen's d=-0.15) was significantly greater than the RBANS (d=-0.097) while the PACC5 effect size (d=-0.139) was numerically larger than the RBANS. When examining subscores from the composites, memory tests (i.e., Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test, Figure Recall) and speed of processing (i.e., Digit-Symbol/Coding on the PACC/RBANS) exhibited the largest Aβ+/- effect sizes.
CONCLUSIONS
Cross-sectional relationships between Aβ and cognition among clinically unimpaired older adults are detectable on multi-domain cognitive composites but are relatively small in magnitude. The Aβ+/- group effect was statistically larger for PACC and marginally larger for PACC5 versus RBANS. However, interpretation of composite sensitivity to Aβ status cross-sectionally cannot be generalized to sensitivity to change over time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35542998
doi: 10.14283/jpad.2022.17
doi:
Substances chimiques
Amyloid
0
Amyloid beta-Peptides
0
Pyridines
0
Thiazines
0
atabecestat
2834W8D6GK
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
255-261Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Kathryn V. Papp has received funding from the Alzheimer’s Association and the National Institute of Health. She has served a paid consultant for Biogen Idec and Digital Cognition Technologies. Christopher Randolph receives a small royalty for Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. Ellen Grober receives a small royalty for the commercial use of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding test. Hany Rofael and Gerald Novak are employees of Janssen Research and Development and may own stock/stock options in Johnson and Johnson. Michael Donohue is married to an employee of Janssen Research and Development who may own stock/stock options in Johnson and Johnson; and has received research funding from the National Institutes of Health, Janssen, Eli Lilly, and Eisai. Karin Ernstrom has received research funding from the National Institutes of Health, Janssen, Eli Lilly, and Eisai. Rema Raman has received research funding from the National Institutes of Health, Janssen, Eli Lilly, and Eisai. Shunran Wang has received research funding from the National Institutes of Health and Eisai. Reisa Sperling has received research funding from Janssen, and has served as a consultant to AC Immune, Biogen, Eisai, Janssen, Roche, and Takeda. H Robert Brashear, Gary Romano, and David Henley were employed by Janssen Research and Development during the time the study was conducted and may own stock/stock options in Johnson and Johnson. Amy E. Veroff is a consultant neuropsychologist to Janssen Research and Development and receives a small royalty for commercial use of some FCSRT materials.