Lateral Harvest of an Osseous-Based Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Results in Thinner Remaining Patellar Bone.
ACL reconstruction
patella
patellar fracture
quadriceps tendon
Journal
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
received:
06
02
2022
accepted:
23
02
2022
entrez:
13
5
2022
pubmed:
14
5
2022
medline:
14
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patellar fracture after quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been reported in up to 8.8% of patients. To determine the thickness of the remaining patellar bone across the QT graft harvest location while providing clinical guidance for safely harvesting a patellar bone block when using a QT graft in ACLR. Descriptive laboratory study. Medial and lateral QT graft boundaries were marked using a bone saw on 13 cadaveric patellae, and 3-dimensional computed tomography models were created. After the harvest of a virtual bone block with a maximum depth of 10 mm, the thickness of the remaining bone was measured across the graft harvest location in 9 zones. The thickness of the remaining bone was analyzed according to zone, graft harvest location, and patellar facet length. Risk zones were defined as <50% total patellar depth remaining. We observed substantial variability in QT bone block harvest location, in which the distance between the lateral boundary of the harvest location and the lateral patellar cortex was from 21.2% to 49.2% of the axial patellar width. There was significantly less bone remaining in the lateral columns (mean ± SD, 7.56 ± 2.19 mm) compared with the medial columns (9.83 ± 2.10 mm) of the graft harvest location ( Harvest of a more laterally based QT autograft bone block resulted in thinner remaining patellar thickness, increasing the potential of encountering a risk zone for fracture. Care should be taken to avoid harvesting the patellar bone block too laterally during ACLR.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Patellar fracture after quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been reported in up to 8.8% of patients.
Purpose
UNASSIGNED
To determine the thickness of the remaining patellar bone across the QT graft harvest location while providing clinical guidance for safely harvesting a patellar bone block when using a QT graft in ACLR.
Study Design
UNASSIGNED
Descriptive laboratory study.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Medial and lateral QT graft boundaries were marked using a bone saw on 13 cadaveric patellae, and 3-dimensional computed tomography models were created. After the harvest of a virtual bone block with a maximum depth of 10 mm, the thickness of the remaining bone was measured across the graft harvest location in 9 zones. The thickness of the remaining bone was analyzed according to zone, graft harvest location, and patellar facet length. Risk zones were defined as <50% total patellar depth remaining.
Results
UNASSIGNED
We observed substantial variability in QT bone block harvest location, in which the distance between the lateral boundary of the harvest location and the lateral patellar cortex was from 21.2% to 49.2% of the axial patellar width. There was significantly less bone remaining in the lateral columns (mean ± SD, 7.56 ± 2.19 mm) compared with the medial columns (9.83 ± 2.10 mm) of the graft harvest location (
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Harvest of a more laterally based QT autograft bone block resulted in thinner remaining patellar thickness, increasing the potential of encountering a risk zone for fracture.
Clinical Relevance
UNASSIGNED
Care should be taken to avoid harvesting the patellar bone block too laterally during ACLR.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35547608
doi: 10.1177/23259671221093685
pii: 10.1177_23259671221093685
pmc: PMC9083045
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
23259671221093685Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: D.M.K. has received grant support from Arthrex and education payments from Medwest and Smith & Nephew. A.B.Y. has received education payments from Arthrex/Medwest, consulting fees from JRF Ortho and Olympus American, and honoraria from JRF Ortho. J.C. has received education payments from Arthrex and Smith & Nephew; consulting fees from DePuy, Linvatec, Smith & Nephew, and Arthrex; speaking fees from Linvatec; and hospitality payments from Stryker. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Références
Arthroscopy. 2014 May;30(5):593-8
pubmed: 24630956
Arthroscopy. 2016 Jan;32(1):71-5
pubmed: 26382635
Arthroscopy. 2021 May;37(5):1559-1566
pubmed: 33539983
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Sep;47(11):2543-2549
pubmed: 31403824
Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2015 Oct 14;2(4):122-128
pubmed: 29264251
Med Pregl. 2012 Nov-Dec;65(11-12):476-82
pubmed: 23297613
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992 Jul;74(4):617-9
pubmed: 1624526
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Sep;24(9):2899-2905
pubmed: 25749653
Arthroscopy. 2008 Feb;24(2):162-6
pubmed: 18237699
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Nov;15(11):1284-92
pubmed: 17721778
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):448-54
pubmed: 20097928
Arthroscopy. 2010 Sep;26(9 Suppl):S2-12
pubmed: 20810090
Arthroscopy. 1999 Jan-Feb;15(1):93-7
pubmed: 10024040
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Aug;21(8):1882-8
pubmed: 23007413
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jul 11;7(7):2325967119856578
pubmed: 31321249
Spartan Med Res J. 2019 Jul 01;4(1):7961
pubmed: 33655157
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Sep;44(9):2323-9
pubmed: 27365373
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jun;29(6):1927-1935
pubmed: 32909058
Arthroscopy. 1996 Dec;12(6):756-9
pubmed: 9115569
Arthroscopy. 2009 Dec;25(12):1408-14
pubmed: 19962067
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Jul;(376):278-86
pubmed: 10906885
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;47(14):3531-3540
pubmed: 30790526
SICOT J. 2021;7:16
pubmed: 33749586
Int J Sports Med. 2021 Jun;42(8):682-693
pubmed: 33784786
Arthroscopy. 2012 Jul;28(7):980-4
pubmed: 22498044
Arthroscopy. 2004 Oct;20(8):795-802
pubmed: 15483539
Arthroscopy. 2015 Mar;31(3):541-54
pubmed: 25543249
Arthroscopy. 2002 Jul-Aug;18(6):578-83
pubmed: 12098117
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;44(6):1502-7
pubmed: 26920430
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2009 Dec;17(4):242-6
pubmed: 19910782
Arthroscopy. 2013 Dec;29(12):1981-90
pubmed: 24140140
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Mar 06;7(3):2325967119829051
pubmed: 30859109