Predictors of Major Dietary Patterns Among Pregnant Women Attending Public Health Facilities in Eastern Ethiopia: A New Epidemiological Approach.
dietary pattern
factor analysis
food frequency
ordinal logistic regression
pregnant
Journal
Frontiers in nutrition
ISSN: 2296-861X
Titre abrégé: Front Nutr
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101642264
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
04
02
2022
accepted:
10
03
2022
entrez:
13
5
2022
pubmed:
14
5
2022
medline:
14
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dietary pattern analysis is a robust statistical procedure that efficiently characterize the dietary intakes of individuals. However, there is a lack of robust dietary intake evidence beyond nutrient intake in Ethiopia. This study was to answer, what are the major dietary consumption patterns and its predictors among pregnant women in Ethiopia. A facility-based survey among 380 randomly selected pregnant women using a contextualized food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) over 1 month recall was used. The frequency of food consumption was standardized to daily frequency equivalents, and a sequential exploratory factor analysis was used to derive major dietary patterns. A multivariable ordinary logistic regression model was fitted with all its assumptions. Three major dietary patterns ("fruits and animal-source foods," "cereals, tubers, and sweet foods," "legumes and vegetables"), explaining 65% of the total variation were identified. Women snacks (AOR = 1.93; 1.23-2.75), without food aversion (AOR = 1.59; 1.08-2.35), non-fasting (AOR = 0.75; 1.12-2.12), and receiving nutritional counseling (AOR = 1.96; 1.25-3.07) were significantly positively associated with a higher tercile of fruits and animal-source food consumption. Non-working mothers (AOR = 1.8;1.23-2.76), chronic disease (AOR = 1.88; 1.14-3.09), or received nutritional counseling (AOR = 1.33; 0.88-2.01), were fasting (AOR = 1.33;0.88-2.01), and no food cravings (AOR = 4.27;2.67-6.84), and aversion (AOR = 1.60;1.04-2.44) had significantly higher odds of consuming cereals, tubers, and sweet foods. Literacy (AOR = 1.87; 1.14-3.09), urban residence (AOR = 2.10; 1.10-3.93), low socioeconomic class (AOR = 2.68; 1.30-5.23), and skipping meals (AOR = 1.73; 1.15-2.62) were associated with higher odds of legume and vegetable consumption. Socioeconomic class, literacy, occupation, getting nutritional counseling, habits of food craving, food aversion, and fasting can predict a woman's dietary pattern.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Dietary pattern analysis is a robust statistical procedure that efficiently characterize the dietary intakes of individuals. However, there is a lack of robust dietary intake evidence beyond nutrient intake in Ethiopia. This study was to answer, what are the major dietary consumption patterns and its predictors among pregnant women in Ethiopia.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
A facility-based survey among 380 randomly selected pregnant women using a contextualized food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) over 1 month recall was used. The frequency of food consumption was standardized to daily frequency equivalents, and a sequential exploratory factor analysis was used to derive major dietary patterns. A multivariable ordinary logistic regression model was fitted with all its assumptions.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Three major dietary patterns ("fruits and animal-source foods," "cereals, tubers, and sweet foods," "legumes and vegetables"), explaining 65% of the total variation were identified. Women snacks (AOR = 1.93; 1.23-2.75), without food aversion (AOR = 1.59; 1.08-2.35), non-fasting (AOR = 0.75; 1.12-2.12), and receiving nutritional counseling (AOR = 1.96; 1.25-3.07) were significantly positively associated with a higher tercile of fruits and animal-source food consumption. Non-working mothers (AOR = 1.8;1.23-2.76), chronic disease (AOR = 1.88; 1.14-3.09), or received nutritional counseling (AOR = 1.33; 0.88-2.01), were fasting (AOR = 1.33;0.88-2.01), and no food cravings (AOR = 4.27;2.67-6.84), and aversion (AOR = 1.60;1.04-2.44) had significantly higher odds of consuming cereals, tubers, and sweet foods. Literacy (AOR = 1.87; 1.14-3.09), urban residence (AOR = 2.10; 1.10-3.93), low socioeconomic class (AOR = 2.68; 1.30-5.23), and skipping meals (AOR = 1.73; 1.15-2.62) were associated with higher odds of legume and vegetable consumption.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Socioeconomic class, literacy, occupation, getting nutritional counseling, habits of food craving, food aversion, and fasting can predict a woman's dietary pattern.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35548559
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.855149
pmc: PMC9085216
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
855149Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Oumer, Abraham and Nuri.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Am Coll Nutr. 2020 Jan;39(1):29-38
pubmed: 30951436
Nutrients. 2016 Jun 07;8(6):
pubmed: 27338455
J Nutr. 2010 Nov;140(11):2048S-50S
pubmed: 20881078
Matern Child Nutr. 2019 Jul;15(3):e12751
pubmed: 30426676
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(12):2412-9
pubmed: 23062966
Food Nutr Res. 2017 Mar 29;61(1):1305193
pubmed: 28469546
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 11;19(1):1663
pubmed: 31829213
J Nutr Sci. 2021 Nov 22;10:e98
pubmed: 34888036
Nutrients. 2019 Feb 20;11(2):
pubmed: 30791647
Clin Nutr Res. 2019 Jan 25;8(1):64-73
pubmed: 30746349
BMJ. 2018 Jun 13;361:k2396
pubmed: 29898951
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Aug;118(2 Pt 1):305-312
pubmed: 21775846
Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32:5-25
pubmed: 20237078
Clin Nutr. 2011 Apr;30(2):156-64
pubmed: 20970896
Food Nutr Bull. 2010 Jun;31(2):234-41
pubmed: 20707229
BMJ. 2014 Mar 04;348:g1446
pubmed: 24609054
Ann Nutr Metab. 2019;74(2):93-106
pubmed: 30673669
Reprod Health. 2021 Oct 18;18(1):208
pubmed: 34663373
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec 23;19(1):517
pubmed: 31870426
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008 Sep;35(3):369-83, viii
pubmed: 18760225
J Pregnancy. 2013;2013:368461
pubmed: 23476780
Health Care Women Int. 2020 Feb;41(2):159-168
pubmed: 30998436
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 25;18(1):183
pubmed: 29801471
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 6;14(9):e0221712
pubmed: 31490956
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016 Aug;71(7):413-26
pubmed: 27436176
Curr Opin Lipidol. 2002 Feb;13(1):3-9
pubmed: 11790957
Br J Cancer. 2011 Apr 26;104(9):1493-9
pubmed: 21468044
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2018 May;12(3):399-404
pubmed: 29576522
BMC Hematol. 2017 Oct 17;17:17
pubmed: 29075500
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2003 Feb;16(1):3-11
pubmed: 12581404
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 16;9(7):e027846
pubmed: 31315863
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2016 Jun;29(3):281-9
pubmed: 26400798
Nutrients. 2019 Sep 11;11(9):
pubmed: 31514354
Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 15;85(2):135-149
pubmed: 30057177
J Nutr. 2009 Jun;139(6):1162-8
pubmed: 19369368
Nutr J. 2018 Jun 12;17(1):61
pubmed: 29895304
Food Nutr Bull. 2012 Sep;33(3 Suppl):S146-56
pubmed: 23193765
Public Health. 2018 Jan;154:172-181
pubmed: 29248827
Placenta. 2013 Oct;34(10):841-5
pubmed: 23916422
Physiol Behav. 2018 Sep 1;193(Pt B):279-283
pubmed: 29421590
Proc Nutr Soc. 2013 May;72(2):191-9
pubmed: 23360896
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):18
pubmed: 31906981
Arch Intern Med. 2001 Aug 13-27;161(15):1857-62
pubmed: 11493127
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010 Feb;32(2):165-173
pubmed: 20181319
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Oct 29;18(1):119
pubmed: 30373530
Matern Child Nutr. 2018 Jan;14(1):
pubmed: 28836343
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Aug;20(11):1928-1940
pubmed: 28629489
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Dec 17;10:850
pubmed: 31920966
Midwifery. 2013 Sep;29(9):1027-34
pubmed: 23427852