How to embed qualitative research in trials: insights from the feasibility study of the SAFER trial programme.
Atrial fibrillation
Frameworks
Qualitative research with trials
Working relationships
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 May 2022
12 May 2022
Historique:
received:
30
08
2021
accepted:
21
03
2022
entrez:
13
5
2022
pubmed:
14
5
2022
medline:
18
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Qualitative research can enhance the design, conduct and interpretation of trials. Despite this, few trials incorporate qualitative methods, and those that do may not realise their full potential. In this commentary, we highlight how qualitative research can contribute to the design, conduct and day-to-day running of a trial, outlining the working arrangements and relationships that facilitate these contributions. In doing so, we draw on (i) existing frameworks on the role of qualitative research alongside trials and (ii) our experience of integrated qualitative research conducted as part of the feasibility study of the SAFER trial (Screening for Atrial Fibrillation with ECG to Reduce stroke), a cluster randomised controlled trial of screening people aged 70 and above for atrial fibrillation in primary care in England. The activities and presence of the qualitative team contributed to important changes in the design, conduct and day-to-day running of the SAFER feasibility study, and the subsequent main trial, informing diverse decisions concerning trial documentation, trial delivery, timing and content of measures and the information given to participating patients and practices. These included asking practices to give screening results to all participants and not just to 'screen positive' participants, and greater recognition of the contribution of practice reception staff to trial delivery. These changes were facilitated by a 'one research team' approach that underpinned all formal and informal working processes from the outset and maximised the value of both qualitative and trial coordination expertise. The challenging problems facing health services require a combination of research methods and data types. Our experience and the literature show that the benefits of embedding qualitative research in trials are more likely to be realised if attention is given to both structural factors and relationships from the outset. These include sustained and sufficient funding for qualitative research, embedding qualitative research fully within the trial programme, providing shared infrastructure and resources and committing to relationships based on mutual recognition of and respect for the value of different methods and perspectives. We outline key learning for the planning of future trials.Trial registration: Screening for atrial fibrillation with ECG to reduce stroke ISRCTN16939438 (feasibility study); Screening for atrial fibrillation with ECG to reduce stroke - a randomised controlled trial ISRCTN72104369 .
Identifiants
pubmed: 35549744
doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06308-7
pii: 10.1186/s13063-022-06308-7
pmc: PMC9096750
doi:
Types de publication
Letter
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
394Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00006/6
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12015/4
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 203921/Z/16/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jul;38(2):338-43
pubmed: 24937019
Addiction. 2019 Dec;114(12):2257-2266
pubmed: 31400177
BMJ. 2009 Sep 10;339:b3496
pubmed: 19744976
Health Expect. 2014 Oct;17(5):670-82
pubmed: 22712887
Trials. 2020 Nov 27;21(1):982
pubmed: 33246496
BMJ. 2019 May 10;365:l2068
pubmed: 31076440
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Mar;70(5):769-78
pubmed: 20005617
Trials. 2019 May 27;20(1):289
pubmed: 31133076
Trials. 2013 Feb 21;14:54
pubmed: 23433341
BMJ Open. 2014 May 15;4(5):e005045
pubmed: 24833694
Trials. 2013 Oct 25;14:353
pubmed: 24160371
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jul 6;20(1):181
pubmed: 32631324
Qual Health Res. 2008 Nov;18(11):1574-85
pubmed: 18849518
Trials. 2016 Aug 09;17(1):396
pubmed: 27507134
Trials. 2018 Oct 29;19(1):589
pubmed: 30373646
J Health Psychol. 2020 Feb;25(2):256-265
pubmed: 31177848
Trials. 2012 Jun 28;13:95
pubmed: 22742939
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 26;9(11):e032081
pubmed: 31772096
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 27;13(11):e0193077
pubmed: 30481185
Trials. 2019 Jun 6;20(1):329
pubmed: 31171041
AIDS Behav. 2019 Aug;23(8):2146-2154
pubmed: 30535615
BMJ Open. 2013 Jun 20;3(6):
pubmed: 23794542
Trials. 2017 Mar 27;18(1):140
pubmed: 28347354
Trials. 2014 Jun 09;15:215
pubmed: 24913438
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Feb 18;14:24
pubmed: 24533771
BMJ. 2016 Feb 10;352:i563
pubmed: 26865572
Qual Health Res. 2016 Apr;26(5):587-602
pubmed: 26657970
Trials. 2018 Oct 25;19(1):584
pubmed: 30359293
Qual Health Res. 2019 Apr;29(5):623-631
pubmed: 30871431
Qual Health Res. 2020 Apr;30(5):666-678
pubmed: 31744371
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061
pubmed: 34593508
Qual Health Res. 2019 Apr;29(5):672-679
pubmed: 30791819
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015 Sep 7;1:32
pubmed: 27965810
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Jun;18(38):1-197, v-vi
pubmed: 24914457
Trials. 2016 Jun 08;17(1):283
pubmed: 27278130
J Mix Methods Res. 2019 Jan;13(1):19-32
pubmed: 30595679