Implementation Strategies to Support Built Environment Approaches in Community Settings.

community organization environmental and systems change physical activity/exercise

Journal

Health promotion practice
ISSN: 1524-8399
Titre abrégé: Health Promot Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100890609

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2023
Historique:
medline: 2 5 2023
pubmed: 14 5 2022
entrez: 13 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Built environment approaches are recommended to improve population physical activity levels. Implementation strategies are needed to improve uptake, but little is known about effective strategies to translate research to practice in community settings. Inform implementation strategies through understanding delivery agents' perceptions of (1) built environment approaches, (2) a toolkit developed to support implementation, and (3) other required implementation strategies. A toolkit was developed to detail the process of partnering to change the built environment and provide examples of built environment approaches (e.g., walking paths, traffic calming). Data were collected through focus groups (N = 3) with Extension Agents (n = 46) in 2020. The semi-structured focus group script was based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Technology Acceptance model. Rapid content analysis techniques and a deductive, grounded theory approach were used to interpret the data. Results. Focus groups generated meaning units coded into themes of perceptions of the intervention (subthemes: barriers, resources needed, and facilitators) and perceptions of the toolkit (subthemes: components to add, positive perceptions, and helpful components). The most common resources needed were coalition guidance and funding. Agents experience barriers and facilitators to implementing built environment approaches and have specific needs for support. Based on the results, we created implementation strategies: (1) Places for Physical Activity toolkit, (2) Coalition Coaching, and (3) Mini-Grants. Future work is needed to investigate the effectiveness of these implementation strategies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Built environment approaches are recommended to improve population physical activity levels. Implementation strategies are needed to improve uptake, but little is known about effective strategies to translate research to practice in community settings.
PURPOSE
Inform implementation strategies through understanding delivery agents' perceptions of (1) built environment approaches, (2) a toolkit developed to support implementation, and (3) other required implementation strategies.
METHOD
A toolkit was developed to detail the process of partnering to change the built environment and provide examples of built environment approaches (e.g., walking paths, traffic calming). Data were collected through focus groups (N = 3) with Extension Agents (n = 46) in 2020. The semi-structured focus group script was based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Technology Acceptance model. Rapid content analysis techniques and a deductive, grounded theory approach were used to interpret the data. Results. Focus groups generated meaning units coded into themes of perceptions of the intervention (subthemes: barriers, resources needed, and facilitators) and perceptions of the toolkit (subthemes: components to add, positive perceptions, and helpful components). The most common resources needed were coalition guidance and funding.
CONCLUSION
Agents experience barriers and facilitators to implementing built environment approaches and have specific needs for support. Based on the results, we created implementation strategies: (1) Places for Physical Activity toolkit, (2) Coalition Coaching, and (3) Mini-Grants. Future work is needed to investigate the effectiveness of these implementation strategies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35549927
doi: 10.1177/15248399221081835
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

502-513

Auteurs

Laura E Balis (LE)

Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Louisville, KY, USA.

Jessica Vincent (J)

University of Arkansas System, Little Rock, AR, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH