Genetic regulation and variation of expression of miRNA and mRNA transcripts in fetal muscle tissue in the context of sex, dam and variable fetal weight.
Fetal weight
Pig
Sex-differences
mRNA
miRNA
Journal
Biology of sex differences
ISSN: 2042-6410
Titre abrégé: Biol Sex Differ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101548963
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 05 2022
12 05 2022
Historique:
received:
21
01
2022
accepted:
25
04
2022
entrez:
13
5
2022
pubmed:
14
5
2022
medline:
20
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Impaired skeletal muscle growth in utero can result in reduced birth weight and pathogenesis of intrauterine growth restriction. Fetal and placental growth is influenced by many factors including genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors. In fact, the sex and genotype of the fetus itself, as well as the mother providing it with a suitable environment, influence the growth of the fetus. Hence, our goal was to decipher and elucidate the molecular pathways of developmental processes mediated by miRNAs and mRNAs in fetal muscle tissue in the context of sex, dam, and fetal weight. Therefore, we analyse the variation of miRNA and mRNA expression in relation to these factors. In addition, the coincidence of genetic regulation of these mRNAs and miRNAs, as revealed by expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analyses, with sex-, mother- and weight-associated expression was investigated. A three-generation pig F2 population (n = 118) based on reciprocal crossing of German Landrace (DL) and Pietrain (Pi) was used. Genotype information and transcriptomic data (mRNA and miRNA) from longissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) of pig fetuses sampled at 63 days post-conception (dpc) were used for eQTL analyses. The transcript abundances of 13, 853, and 275 probe-sets were influenced by sex, dam and fetal weight at 63 dpc, respectively (FDR < 5%). Most of significant transcripts affected by sex were located on the sex chromosomes including KDM6A and ANOS1 or autosomes including ANKS1B, LOC100155138 and miR-153. The fetal muscle transcripts associated with fetal weight indicated clearer metabolic directions than maternally influenced fetal muscle transcripts. Moreover, coincidence of genetic regulation (eQTL) and variation in transcript abundance due to sex, dam and fetal weight were identified. Integrating information on eQTL, sex-, dam- and weight-associated differential expression and QTL for fetal weight allowed us to identify molecular pathways and shed light on the basic biological processes associated with differential muscle development in males and females, with implications for adaptive fetal programming.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Impaired skeletal muscle growth in utero can result in reduced birth weight and pathogenesis of intrauterine growth restriction. Fetal and placental growth is influenced by many factors including genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors. In fact, the sex and genotype of the fetus itself, as well as the mother providing it with a suitable environment, influence the growth of the fetus. Hence, our goal was to decipher and elucidate the molecular pathways of developmental processes mediated by miRNAs and mRNAs in fetal muscle tissue in the context of sex, dam, and fetal weight. Therefore, we analyse the variation of miRNA and mRNA expression in relation to these factors. In addition, the coincidence of genetic regulation of these mRNAs and miRNAs, as revealed by expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analyses, with sex-, mother- and weight-associated expression was investigated.
METHODS
A three-generation pig F2 population (n = 118) based on reciprocal crossing of German Landrace (DL) and Pietrain (Pi) was used. Genotype information and transcriptomic data (mRNA and miRNA) from longissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) of pig fetuses sampled at 63 days post-conception (dpc) were used for eQTL analyses.
RESULTS
The transcript abundances of 13, 853, and 275 probe-sets were influenced by sex, dam and fetal weight at 63 dpc, respectively (FDR < 5%). Most of significant transcripts affected by sex were located on the sex chromosomes including KDM6A and ANOS1 or autosomes including ANKS1B, LOC100155138 and miR-153. The fetal muscle transcripts associated with fetal weight indicated clearer metabolic directions than maternally influenced fetal muscle transcripts. Moreover, coincidence of genetic regulation (eQTL) and variation in transcript abundance due to sex, dam and fetal weight were identified.
CONCLUSIONS
Integrating information on eQTL, sex-, dam- and weight-associated differential expression and QTL for fetal weight allowed us to identify molecular pathways and shed light on the basic biological processes associated with differential muscle development in males and females, with implications for adaptive fetal programming.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35550009
doi: 10.1186/s13293-022-00433-3
pii: 10.1186/s13293-022-00433-3
pmc: PMC9103043
doi:
Substances chimiques
MicroRNAs
0
RNA, Messenger
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
24Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Mol Cell Probes. 2019 Apr;44:29-36
pubmed: 30703449
Nutrients. 2017 Jan 18;9(1):
pubmed: 28106759
Genes (Basel). 2021 Aug 19;12(8):
pubmed: 34440438
J Anim Sci. 2019 Apr 29;97(5):1967-1978
pubmed: 31222274
Anticancer Res. 2017 Dec;37(12):6511-6521
pubmed: 29187425
Nat Genet. 2016 May;48(5):481-7
pubmed: 27019110
J Anim Sci. 2003 Mar;81(3):604-10
pubmed: 12661639
Biomed Pharmacother. 2019 Jan;109:1478-1487
pubmed: 30551399
J Clin Invest. 2016 Apr 1;126(4):1555-65
pubmed: 26999603
Cells. 2021 Apr 24;10(5):
pubmed: 33923344
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jan;96(1):E130-4
pubmed: 20962017
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2015 Oct 15;309(8):R920-8
pubmed: 26224688
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 19;6:24167
pubmed: 27090298
Front Genet. 2019 Apr 17;10:348
pubmed: 31057604
Nature. 2011 Oct 26;478(7370):483-9
pubmed: 22031440
J Anim Breed Genet. 2011 Feb;128(1):15-27
pubmed: 21214640
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 28;15(1):e0227861
pubmed: 31990923
Epigenetics. 2012 Mar;7(3):239-52
pubmed: 22430800
BMC Dev Biol. 2007 Oct 01;7:109
pubmed: 17908293
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 05;5:16264
pubmed: 26537429
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 31;12(7):e0181897
pubmed: 28759650
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 05;7:39830
pubmed: 28054563
Bioinformatics. 2012 May 15;28(10):1353-8
pubmed: 22492648
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009 Apr 10;302(1):99-107
pubmed: 19356628
Endocrinology. 1994 Oct;135(4):1628-38
pubmed: 7925126
J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2005;26(2-3):157-65
pubmed: 15999225
Reproduction. 2009 Sep;138(3):609-17
pubmed: 19502453
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 21;6:39614
pubmed: 28000754
J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90(12):4266-79
pubmed: 22745188
Biol Reprod. 2013 Jan 31;88(1):24
pubmed: 23153566
Genome Res. 2005 May;15(5):681-91
pubmed: 15837804
Nat Immunol. 2016 Dec;17(12):1352-1360
pubmed: 27776107
Genes Dev. 1994 Dec 15;8(24):2953-63
pubmed: 8001817
Int J Obes (Lond). 2010 Mar;34(3):487-99
pubmed: 20029374
J Cell Biol. 2007 Apr 9;177(1):73-86
pubmed: 17420291
Oncogene. 2010 Jul 29;29(30):4362-8
pubmed: 20498629
Genomics. 1998 Mar 1;48(2):145-56
pubmed: 9521867
Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Dec;82(6):1155-61
pubmed: 16332646
BMC Genomics. 2016 Aug 02;17:531
pubmed: 27485725
Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1893:335-352
pubmed: 30565145
J Neurol Sci. 2016 Mar 15;362:304-8
pubmed: 26944168
Gene. 2015 May 1;561(2):190-8
pubmed: 25724393
Int J Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 10;10(3):327-37
pubmed: 24643240
Int J Biol Sci. 2014 Feb 07;10(3):236-44
pubmed: 24644423
J Biol Chem. 2012 Dec 28;287(53):44761-71
pubmed: 23148210
BMC Genomics. 2019 Nov 13;20(1):849
pubmed: 31722663
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2021 Feb 11;:
pubmed: 33581338
Nutr Metab (Lond). 2010 Jan 15;7:3
pubmed: 20148112
J Anim Breed Genet. 2011 Feb;128(1):35-43
pubmed: 21214642
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019 Jan 15;10(1):26
pubmed: 30646953
J Anim Sci. 2006 Apr;84 Suppl:E113-23
pubmed: 16582082
Reprod Nutr Dev. 2002 Sep-Oct;42(5):415-31
pubmed: 12537254
Endocrinology. 2015 Sep;156(9):3069-76
pubmed: 26151354
Anim Reprod Sci. 2019 Oct;209:106139
pubmed: 31514939
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Dec 09;19(12):
pubmed: 30544847
Curr Mol Med. 2011 Jun;11(4):304-16
pubmed: 21506921
J Anim Sci. 1973 Jun;36(6):1088-93
pubmed: 4268264
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2019 Jul;35(2):277-288
pubmed: 31103181
Nat Genet. 1998 Oct;20(2):163-9
pubmed: 9771709
BMC Genomics. 2015 May 12;16:377
pubmed: 25962502
Biol Reprod. 2015 Jun;92(6):143
pubmed: 25947059
Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Sep 18;50(1):46
pubmed: 30227828
J Nutr Biochem. 2016 Jan;27:1-8
pubmed: 26427799
Dev Biol. 2011 May 1;353(1):19-28
pubmed: 21338598
Open Biol. 2017 Nov;7(11):
pubmed: 29118269
Hum Mol Genet. 2019 Sep 1;28(17):2976-2986
pubmed: 31044242
Nature. 2009 Oct 8;461(7265):747-53
pubmed: 19812666
Diabetes. 2016 Jan;65(1):53-61
pubmed: 26696639
Animal. 2015 Apr;9(4):650-9
pubmed: 25391663
Nat Rev Genet. 2015 Apr;16(4):197-212
pubmed: 25707927
Biol Reprod. 2021 Feb 11;104(2):418-429
pubmed: 33074310
Open Biol. 2021 Feb;11(2):200182
pubmed: 33593158
Nat Genet. 2010 Jul;42(7):565-9
pubmed: 20562875
Physiol Genomics. 2012 Aug 17;44(16):811-8
pubmed: 22759919
J Lipid Res. 2011 Apr;52(4):668-78
pubmed: 21289033
Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2000 Nov-Dec;3(6):525-31
pubmed: 11000330
Trends Dev Biol. 2019 Dec;12:55-65
pubmed: 32616989