Paired primary and metastatic lesions of patients with ipilimumab-treated melanoma: high variation in lymphocyte infiltration and HLA-ABC expression whereas tumor mutational load is similar and correlates with clinical outcome.


Journal

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2022
Historique:
accepted: 14 04 2022
entrez: 13 5 2022
pubmed: 14 5 2022
medline: 18 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can lead to long-term responses in patients with metastatic melanoma. Still many patients with melanoma are intrinsically resistant or acquire secondary resistance. Previous studies have used primary or metastatic tumor tissue for biomarker assessment. Especially in melanoma, metastatic lesions are often present at different anatomical sites such as skin, lymph nodes, and visceral organs. The anatomical site may directly affect the tumor microenvironment (TME). To evaluate the impact of tumor evolution on the TME and on ICI treatment outcome, we directly compared paired primary and metastatic melanoma lesions for tumor mutational burden (TMB), HLA-ABC status, and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) of patients that received ipilimumab. TMB was analyzed by sequencing primary and metastatic melanoma lesions using the TruSight Oncology 500 assay. Tumor tissues were subjected to multiplex immunohistochemistry to assess HLA-ABC status and for the detection of TIL subsets (B cells, cytotoxic T cells, helper T cells, and regulatory T cells), by using a machine-learning algorithm. While we observed a very good agreement between TMB of matched primary and metastatic melanoma lesions (intraclass coefficient=0.921), such association was absent for HLA-ABC status, TIL density, and subsets thereof. Interestingly, analyses of different metastatic melanoma lesions within a single patient revealed that TIL density and composition agreed remarkably well, rejecting the hypothesis that the TME of different anatomical sites affects TIL infiltration. Similarly, the HLA-ABC status between different metastatic lesions within patients was also comparable. Furthermore, high TMB, of either primary or metastatic melanoma tissue, directly correlated with response to ipilimumab, whereas lymphocyte density or composition did not. Loss of HLA-ABC in the metastatic lesion correlated to a shorter progression-free survival on ipilimumab. We confirm the link between TMB and HLA-ABC status and the response to ipilimumab-based immunotherapy in melanoma, but no correlation was found for TIL density, neither in primary nor metastatic lesions. Our finding that TMB between paired primary and metastatic melanoma lesions is highly stable, demonstrates its independency of the time point and location of acquisition. TIL and HLA-ABC status in metastatic lesions of different anatomical sites are highly similar within an individual patient.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can lead to long-term responses in patients with metastatic melanoma. Still many patients with melanoma are intrinsically resistant or acquire secondary resistance. Previous studies have used primary or metastatic tumor tissue for biomarker assessment. Especially in melanoma, metastatic lesions are often present at different anatomical sites such as skin, lymph nodes, and visceral organs. The anatomical site may directly affect the tumor microenvironment (TME). To evaluate the impact of tumor evolution on the TME and on ICI treatment outcome, we directly compared paired primary and metastatic melanoma lesions for tumor mutational burden (TMB), HLA-ABC status, and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) of patients that received ipilimumab.
METHODS
TMB was analyzed by sequencing primary and metastatic melanoma lesions using the TruSight Oncology 500 assay. Tumor tissues were subjected to multiplex immunohistochemistry to assess HLA-ABC status and for the detection of TIL subsets (B cells, cytotoxic T cells, helper T cells, and regulatory T cells), by using a machine-learning algorithm.
RESULTS
While we observed a very good agreement between TMB of matched primary and metastatic melanoma lesions (intraclass coefficient=0.921), such association was absent for HLA-ABC status, TIL density, and subsets thereof. Interestingly, analyses of different metastatic melanoma lesions within a single patient revealed that TIL density and composition agreed remarkably well, rejecting the hypothesis that the TME of different anatomical sites affects TIL infiltration. Similarly, the HLA-ABC status between different metastatic lesions within patients was also comparable. Furthermore, high TMB, of either primary or metastatic melanoma tissue, directly correlated with response to ipilimumab, whereas lymphocyte density or composition did not. Loss of HLA-ABC in the metastatic lesion correlated to a shorter progression-free survival on ipilimumab.
CONCLUSIONS
We confirm the link between TMB and HLA-ABC status and the response to ipilimumab-based immunotherapy in melanoma, but no correlation was found for TIL density, neither in primary nor metastatic lesions. Our finding that TMB between paired primary and metastatic melanoma lesions is highly stable, demonstrates its independency of the time point and location of acquisition. TIL and HLA-ABC status in metastatic lesions of different anatomical sites are highly similar within an individual patient.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35550553
pii: jitc-2021-004329
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004329
pmc: PMC9109111
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0
Ipilimumab 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 4;371(23):2189-2199
pubmed: 25409260
Science. 2015 Oct 9;350(6257):207-211
pubmed: 26359337
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Feb 24;8(327):327ra26
pubmed: 26912905
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):711-23
pubmed: 20525992
Cell. 2015 Jan 15;160(1-2):48-61
pubmed: 25594174
Nat Commun. 2016 Jan 29;7:10582
pubmed: 26822383
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 1;33(10):1191-6
pubmed: 25713437
Science. 2016 May 6;352(6286):658-60
pubmed: 27151852
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1480-1492
pubmed: 30361170
J Transl Med. 2011 Nov 28;9:204
pubmed: 22123319
Front Immunol. 2021 Mar 09;12:636568
pubmed: 33767702
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Aug 15;14(16):5242-9
pubmed: 18698043
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019 Dec;3:1-13
pubmed: 35100709
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2020 Mar;69(3):477-488
pubmed: 31980913
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Mar 13;6:27
pubmed: 30931305
Ann Oncol. 2014 Nov;25(11):2277-2284
pubmed: 25210016
Cell. 2017 Nov 2;171(4):934-949.e16
pubmed: 29033130
J Clin Invest. 2017 Aug 1;127(8):2930-2940
pubmed: 28650338
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 29;113(48):E7759-E7768
pubmed: 27837020
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Apr;16(4):375-84
pubmed: 25795410
J Immunother Cancer. 2015 Jun 16;3:23
pubmed: 26085931
J Mol Diagn. 2020 Jun;22(6):757-769
pubmed: 32205293
Ann Oncol. 2021 May;32(5):661-672
pubmed: 33736924
Cancer. 2020 Mar 15;126(6):1166-1174
pubmed: 31869447
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):320-30
pubmed: 25399552
Adv Anat Pathol. 2017 Nov;24(6):311-335
pubmed: 28777143
Cancer Immunol Res. 2016 Apr;4(4):345-53
pubmed: 26873574
Cell. 2016 Mar 24;165(1):35-44
pubmed: 26997480
Cell. 2017 Aug 24;170(5):927-938.e20
pubmed: 28841418
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr 1;32(10):1020-30
pubmed: 24590637
Int J Cancer. 2008 Aug 1;123(3):609-15
pubmed: 18498132
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1824-1835
pubmed: 28891423
Sci Transl Med. 2014 May 28;6(238):238ra70
pubmed: 24871131
J Immunol. 2018 Jan 1;200(1):347-354
pubmed: 29141863
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 30;364(26):2507-16
pubmed: 21639808
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):568-71
pubmed: 25428505
Br J Dermatol. 2008 Jan;158(1):88-94
pubmed: 17999701
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):563-7
pubmed: 25428504
Oncoimmunology. 2018 Sep 5;7(12):e1405206
pubmed: 30524879
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1789-1801
pubmed: 29658430
Cell. 2018 Oct 18;175(3):751-765.e16
pubmed: 30318143
Biomark Res. 2020 Aug 26;8:34
pubmed: 32864131
Cell. 2018 Jun 14;173(7):1755-1769.e22
pubmed: 29754820
J Immunother Cancer. 2021 May;9(5):
pubmed: 34059522
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Dec 15;21(24):5453-9
pubmed: 26289067
Semin Immunol. 2020 Apr;48:101406
pubmed: 33248905
Nature. 2020 Jan;577(7791):561-565
pubmed: 31942071
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 21;377(25):2500-2501
pubmed: 29262275
EBioMedicine. 2021 Jan;63:103137
pubmed: 33310681
Genome Res. 2014 May;24(5):743-50
pubmed: 24782321
Semin Oncol. 2010 Oct;37(5):473-84
pubmed: 21074063
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012 Jul;61(7):1019-31
pubmed: 22146893
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 5;377(14):1345-1356
pubmed: 28889792
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):23-34
pubmed: 26027431
Sci Transl Med. 2018 Jul 18;10(450):
pubmed: 30021886
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Jan 15;11(2 Pt 1):498-504
pubmed: 15701833
Sci Rep. 2019 May 15;9(1):7449
pubmed: 31092853
Int J Cancer. 2014 Jan 1;134(1):102-13
pubmed: 23784959
Cancer Res. 2013 Jun 15;73(12):3499-510
pubmed: 23592754
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 30;364(26):2517-26
pubmed: 21639810
Am J Pathol. 1999 Mar;154(3):745-54
pubmed: 10079252
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 12;377(15):1409-1412
pubmed: 29020592
Cancer Res. 2016 Jun 15;76(12):3496-506
pubmed: 27197179
Cancer Discov. 2016 Feb;6(2):202-16
pubmed: 26645196
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Feb;160(2):450-456
pubmed: 33213898
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2521-32
pubmed: 25891173
Mol Cancer Ther. 2017 Nov;16(11):2598-2608
pubmed: 28835386
Immunooncol Technol. 2019 Dec 16;4:8-14
pubmed: 35755001
Cancer J. 2011 Mar-Apr;17(2):127-33
pubmed: 21427556
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2018 Jan;67(1):141-151
pubmed: 28988380
Nature. 2015 Jul 9;523(7559):231-5
pubmed: 25970248

Auteurs

Mark A J Gorris (MAJ)

Tumor Immunology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Oncode Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Lieke L van der Woude (LL)

Tumor Immunology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Oncode Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Pathology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Leonie I Kroeze (LI)

Pathology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Kalijn Bol (K)

Medical Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Kiek Verrijp (K)

Oncode Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Pathology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Avital L Amir (AL)

Pathology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Jelena Meek (J)

Tumor Immunology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Johannes Textor (J)

Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Data Science Group, Institute for Computing and Information Sciences, Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Carl G Figdor (CG)

Tumor Immunology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Oncode Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

I Jolanda M de Vries (IJM)

Tumor Immunology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands jolanda.devries@radboudumc.nl.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH