Behavioural optimisation to address trial conduct challenges: case study in the UK-REBOA trial.

Behavioural science Complex interventions Process evaluations Theoretical domains framework Trial methodology

Journal

Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 May 2022
Historique:
received: 13 12 2021
accepted: 23 04 2022
entrez: 13 5 2022
pubmed: 14 5 2022
medline: 18 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Clinical trials comprise multiple processes at various stages of the trial lifecycle. These processes often involve complex behaviours such as recruiting vulnerable patient populations and clinicians having to deliver complex trial interventions successfully. Few studies have utilised a behavioural framework to assess challenges and develop strategies for effective trial recruitment and delivery of trial interventions. This study reports the application of an innovative methodological approach to understand core trial processes, namely recruitment and intervention delivery, using a behavioural science approach to develop strategies designed to mitigate trial process problems. The UK-REBOA trial aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (a novel intervention) in injured patients with exsanguinating haemorrhage. A behavioural investigation ('diagnosis') was conducted using theory-informed (Theoretical Domains Framework, TDF) semi-structured interviews with site staff from the UK-REBOA trial to examine trial processes which could be improved in relation to trial recruitment and delivery of the intervention. Interviews were analysed using the TDF to identify influences on behaviour, which were then mapped to techniques for behaviour change and developed into potential solutions. The behavioural diagnosis of the challenges experienced during trial processes highlighted factors relevant to a range of TDF domains: Skills, Environmental context and resources, Beliefs about capabilities, Beliefs about consequences, Social influences, and Memory, attention, and decision-making processes. Within the solution development phase, we identified 24 suitable behaviour change techniques that were developed into proposed solutions to target reported process problems with the aim of changing behaviour to improve recruitment and/or intervention delivery. Proposed solutions included targeted changes to trial training content, suggestions to restructure the environment (e.g. reinforced the purpose of the trial with information about the social and environmental consequences) and other strategies to reduce barriers to recruitment and intervention delivery. This study demonstrates the feasibility of applying a behavioural approach to investigate ('diagnose') behavioural trial process problems and subsequently develop and implement targeted solutions ('treatment') in an active trauma trial. Understanding the factors that affected behaviour, attitudes and beliefs in this trauma trial allowed us to implement theoretically informed, evidence-based solutions designed to enhance trial practices. ISRCTN 16,184,981.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Clinical trials comprise multiple processes at various stages of the trial lifecycle. These processes often involve complex behaviours such as recruiting vulnerable patient populations and clinicians having to deliver complex trial interventions successfully. Few studies have utilised a behavioural framework to assess challenges and develop strategies for effective trial recruitment and delivery of trial interventions. This study reports the application of an innovative methodological approach to understand core trial processes, namely recruitment and intervention delivery, using a behavioural science approach to develop strategies designed to mitigate trial process problems.
METHODS METHODS
The UK-REBOA trial aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (a novel intervention) in injured patients with exsanguinating haemorrhage. A behavioural investigation ('diagnosis') was conducted using theory-informed (Theoretical Domains Framework, TDF) semi-structured interviews with site staff from the UK-REBOA trial to examine trial processes which could be improved in relation to trial recruitment and delivery of the intervention. Interviews were analysed using the TDF to identify influences on behaviour, which were then mapped to techniques for behaviour change and developed into potential solutions.
RESULTS RESULTS
The behavioural diagnosis of the challenges experienced during trial processes highlighted factors relevant to a range of TDF domains: Skills, Environmental context and resources, Beliefs about capabilities, Beliefs about consequences, Social influences, and Memory, attention, and decision-making processes. Within the solution development phase, we identified 24 suitable behaviour change techniques that were developed into proposed solutions to target reported process problems with the aim of changing behaviour to improve recruitment and/or intervention delivery. Proposed solutions included targeted changes to trial training content, suggestions to restructure the environment (e.g. reinforced the purpose of the trial with information about the social and environmental consequences) and other strategies to reduce barriers to recruitment and intervention delivery.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates the feasibility of applying a behavioural approach to investigate ('diagnose') behavioural trial process problems and subsequently develop and implement targeted solutions ('treatment') in an active trauma trial. Understanding the factors that affected behaviour, attitudes and beliefs in this trauma trial allowed us to implement theoretically informed, evidence-based solutions designed to enhance trial practices.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ISRCTN 16,184,981.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35550599
doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06341-6
pii: 10.1186/s13063-022-06341-6
pmc: PMC9097042
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

398

Subventions

Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : HSRU1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) board
ID : 14/199/09

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Trials. 2018 Jun 25;19(1):328
pubmed: 29941030
Trials. 2019 Oct 7;20(1):578
pubmed: 31590694
Trials. 2014 Jan 23;15:32
pubmed: 24456928
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
Trials. 2021 Mar 25;22(1):230
pubmed: 33766105
Trials. 2017 May 22;18(1):227
pubmed: 28532509
Trials. 2021 Apr 21;22(1):298
pubmed: 33883012
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37
pubmed: 22530986
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760
pubmed: 26613970
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;(3):CD005470
pubmed: 20238340
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Sep;25(3):677-694
pubmed: 32558289
Implement Sci. 2012 Sep 11;7:86
pubmed: 22967756
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 19;10(3):e034354
pubmed: 32198301
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 28;19(1):1180
pubmed: 31455327
Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 21;12(1):77
pubmed: 28637486
Trials. 2018 Feb 5;19(1):48
pubmed: 29397795
Trials. 2019 Aug 9;20(1):492
pubmed: 31399134
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;137:1-13
pubmed: 33727134
Implement Sci. 2019 Apr 29;14(1):43
pubmed: 31036023
Transl Behav Med. 2021 May 25;11(5):1049-1065
pubmed: 32749460

Auteurs

Louisa Lawrie (L)

Institute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Health Services Research Unit, 3Rd Floor Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK. louisa.lawrie1@abdn.ac.uk.

Eilidh M Duncan (EM)

Institute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Health Services Research Unit, 3Rd Floor Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.

Jan O Jansen (JO)

Institute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Health Services Research Unit, 3Rd Floor Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
Center for Injury Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.

Marion K Campbell (MK)

Institute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Health Services Research Unit, 3Rd Floor Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.

Dan Brunsdon (D)

Institute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Health Services Research Unit, 3Rd Floor Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.

Zoë Skea (Z)

Institute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Health Services Research Unit, 3Rd Floor Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.

Taylor Coffey (T)

Institute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Health Services Research Unit, 3Rd Floor Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.

Claire Cochran (C)

Institute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Health Services Research Unit, 3Rd Floor Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.

Katie Gillies (K)

Institute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Health Services Research Unit, 3Rd Floor Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH