The logic of challenging research into bias and social disparity.
Journal
The Behavioral and brain sciences
ISSN: 1469-1825
Titre abrégé: Behav Brain Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7808666
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 05 2022
13 05 2022
Historique:
entrez:
13
5
2022
pubmed:
14
5
2022
medline:
18
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There are two problems with the logic of Cesario's argument for abandoning existing research on social bias. First, laboratory findings of decisional bias have social significance even if Cesario is right that the research strips away real-world context. Second, the argument makes overly skeptical demands of a research program seeking complex causal linkages between micro- and macro-scale phenomena.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35551684
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X21000777
pii: S0140525X21000777
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comment
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e90Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentOn
Type : CommentIn