The logic of challenging research into bias and social disparity.


Journal

The Behavioral and brain sciences
ISSN: 1469-1825
Titre abrégé: Behav Brain Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7808666

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 05 2022
Historique:
entrez: 13 5 2022
pubmed: 14 5 2022
medline: 18 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

There are two problems with the logic of Cesario's argument for abandoning existing research on social bias. First, laboratory findings of decisional bias have social significance even if Cesario is right that the research strips away real-world context. Second, the argument makes overly skeptical demands of a research program seeking complex causal linkages between micro- and macro-scale phenomena.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35551684
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X21000777
pii: S0140525X21000777
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Comment

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e90

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentOn
Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Regina Rini (R)

Department of Philosophy, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada. rarini@yorku.careginarini.net.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH