Methods for identifying biomedical translation: a systematic review.
Translational research
bibliometric analysis
biomedical translational research
methods for evaluating
research evaluation
Journal
American journal of translational research
ISSN: 1943-8141
Titre abrégé: Am J Transl Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101493030
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
27
07
2021
accepted:
30
12
2021
entrez:
13
5
2022
pubmed:
14
5
2022
medline:
14
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Translational medicine is an important area of biomedicine, and has significantly facilitated the development of biomedical research. Despite its relevance, there is no consensus on how to evaluate its progress and impact. A systematic review was carried out to identify all the methods to evaluate translational research. Seven methods were found according to the established criteria to analyze their characteristics, advantages, and limitations. They allow us to perform this type of evaluation in different ways. No relevant advantages were found between them; each one presented its specific limitations that need to be considered. Nevertheless, the Triangle of Biomedicine could be considered the most relevant method, concerning the time since its publication and usefulness. In conclusion, there is still a lack of a gold-standard method for evaluating biomedical translational research.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
2697-2708Informations de copyright
AJTR Copyright © 2022.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None.
Références
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
J Transl Med. 2013 May 24;11:126
pubmed: 23705970
Eval Health Prof. 2014 Mar;37(1):50-70
pubmed: 24085789
Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Jun;4(3):153-62
pubmed: 21707944
BMJ. 2000 Apr 22;320(7242):1107-11
pubmed: 10775218
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210
pubmed: 27919275
Science. 2017 Apr 7;356(6333):78-81
pubmed: 28360137
Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Jan;11(1):77-84
pubmed: 28887873
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jul 22;5(1):e22
pubmed: 33948245
Eval Health Prof. 2014 Mar;37(1):3-18
pubmed: 24064431
Cell. 2015 Sep 24;163(1):21-3
pubmed: 26406364
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 05;2018:1405-1414
pubmed: 30815185
Scientometrics. 2020 Dec;125(3):2349-2382
pubmed: 33746311
Acad Med. 2018 Aug;93(8):1162-1170
pubmed: 29298181
J R Soc Interface. 2018 Apr;15(141):
pubmed: 29618526
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Jun 1;26(6):516-523
pubmed: 30830170
Brief Bioinform. 2019 Mar 22;20(2):457-462
pubmed: 29040418
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Feb;62(2):91-5
pubmed: 16344921
PLoS Biol. 2016 Sep 06;14(9):e1002541
pubmed: 27599104
Res Eval. 2013 Sep;22(3):179-186
pubmed: 24808630
J Transl Med. 2016 Aug 05;14(1):235
pubmed: 27492440
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Sep;14(5):1629-1647
pubmed: 33982407
Database (Oxford). 2019 Jan 1;2019:
pubmed: 30753477
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Sep 11;5(1):e48
pubmed: 33948270
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Apr;132:71-78
pubmed: 33278612
Eval Health Prof. 2020 Sep;43(3):169-179
pubmed: 30917690
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Aug;1(4):253-255
pubmed: 29657860
PLoS Biol. 2019 Oct 10;17(10):e3000416
pubmed: 31600189
PLoS One. 2018 May 9;13(5):e0196545
pubmed: 29742129
Mol Biol Cell. 2017 Jun 1;28(11):1401-1408
pubmed: 28559438
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019 Mar;51(2):205-213
pubmed: 30466163
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Feb;1(1):45-52
pubmed: 28480055