In Utero Heat Stress Has Minimal Impacts on Processed Pork Products: A Comparative Study.
fatty acid composition
gestational heat stress
pork patty
pork sausage emulsion
quality attributes
Journal
Foods (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2304-8158
Titre abrégé: Foods
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101670569
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Apr 2022
24 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
26
03
2022
revised:
12
04
2022
accepted:
19
04
2022
entrez:
14
5
2022
pubmed:
15
5
2022
medline:
15
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to determine what effects in utero heat stress (IUHS) in pigs may have on quality of processed pork products. In two experiments, patties and emulsion sausages were prepared from lean and fat from pigs subjected to IUHS or in utero thermoneutral (IUTN) conditions. Patties formulated to contain 25% added fat had altered textural properties compared to those without additional fat, as shown by lower hardness, cohesiveness, springiness, and chewiness values (p < 0.05), which was not affected by IUHS treatment. Neither fat content nor IUHS treatment affected fluid losses of patties (p > 0.05). In general, 25% added fat patties had greater L*, a*, b*, hue angle, and chroma values than lean patties (p < 0.05). However, 25% added fat patties from the IUHS treatment maintained superior color stability during aerobic display, despite lean patties from this treatment exhibiting increased lipid oxidation (p < 0.05). For emulsion sausages, minimal differences in quality attributes and oxidative stability were found between treatment groups. Subcutaneous fat from IUHS pigs had greater C20:1 and C20:2 than IUTN (p < 0.05), although the magnitude of these differences was slight. Overall, the findings of this study suggest IUHS would have minimal impacts on the functional properties of raw pork, resulting in similar final quality of processed products to IUTN.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35563945
pii: foods11091222
doi: 10.3390/foods11091222
pmc: PMC9104471
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : National Pork Board
ID : 18-094
Références
J Anim Sci. 2015 Jan;93(1):82-92
pubmed: 25568359
Meat Sci. 2016 Jul;117:63-7
pubmed: 26946478
Meat Sci. 2005 Sep;71(1):100-21
pubmed: 22064056
Meat Sci. 2000 Jun;55(2):213-21
pubmed: 22061087
J Anim Sci. 2007 Jun;85(6):1511-21
pubmed: 17296772
Theriogenology. 2020 Sep 15;154:110-119
pubmed: 32540511
Meat Sci. 2014 Nov;98(3):361-71
pubmed: 25017317
Meat Sci. 1992;32(1):31-43
pubmed: 22059721
J Anim Sci. 2009 Apr;87(4):1423-40
pubmed: 19066245
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 10;9(11):e110859
pubmed: 25383953
Meat Sci. 2009 Jun;82(2):266-71
pubmed: 20416740
Meat Sci. 2019 May;151:64-74
pubmed: 30710769
J Anim Sci. 2015 May;93(5):2587-96
pubmed: 26020353
Meat Sci. 2020 Apr;162:108025
pubmed: 31841730
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2008 Feb;48(2):137-59
pubmed: 18274969
Animals (Basel). 2021 Mar 06;11(3):
pubmed: 33800814
Meat Sci. 2020 May;163:108090
pubmed: 32087505
J Food Sci. 2017 Dec;82(12):2787-2793
pubmed: 29095501
Meat Sci. 2008 Apr;78(4):343-58
pubmed: 22062452
J Anim Sci. 2015 Jan;93(1):71-81
pubmed: 25568358
Meat Sci. 2010 Sep;86(1):86-94
pubmed: 20554121
J Anim Sci. 2006 Apr;84 Suppl:E105-12
pubmed: 16582081
J Anim Sci. 2020 Sep 1;98(9):
pubmed: 32835367