Current Feeding Practice of

African clawed frog amphibian model organism nutrition survey

Journal

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 May 2022
Historique:
received: 11 04 2022
revised: 25 04 2022
accepted: 28 04 2022
entrez: 14 5 2022
pubmed: 15 5 2022
medline: 15 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

African clawed frogs are common animal models used in various research areas. However, husbandry and especially feeding regimens are not nearly as standardized as is established for other laboratory animals. We recorded the diets and feeding protocols commonly used in laboratory practice in a questionnaire (18 responses). The survey revealed a wide variety of housing conditions. Feeding protocols and, in particular, diet composition varied considerably between facilities. While diets tailored to Xenopus were used in the majority, differences in feeding frequency and dietary components were noted. From five responses, the weekly feed intake per frog could be calculated, showing considerable differences in dry matter intake (1.37-5.4 g). The labelled nutrient content of the diets fed in the facilities (n = 10) met the recommendations in most cases, with protein as the major energy source. However, the mineral content varied markedly between diets. Both floating and sinking diets were used, while quickly sinking diets were associated with feed leftovers. Feed processing may likely influence feed intake behavior. Further research is needed to ensure standardization for aquatic species with respect to husbandry systems, feeding regimens, and especially the nutrient composition of feeds. Furthermore, this work will contribute positively to animal welfare and the comparability of research results.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35565589
pii: ani12091163
doi: 10.3390/ani12091163
pmc: PMC9101390
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Zoo Biol. 2013 Nov-Dec;32(6):655-8
pubmed: 24151130
Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1865:1-17
pubmed: 30151755
Zoo Biol. 2018 May;37(3):196-205
pubmed: 29655202
Cells Tissues Organs. 2018;205(5-6):303-313
pubmed: 30092565
J Nutr. 1991 Nov;121(11 Suppl):S29-34
pubmed: 1941230
Zoo Biol. 2014 Nov-Dec;33(6):527-35
pubmed: 24958673
Lab Anim (NY). 2008 Apr;37(4):165-9
pubmed: 18356916
J Exp Biol. 2017 Dec 1;220(Pt 23):4486-4491
pubmed: 28982969
Lab Anim. 1995 Apr;29(2):152-62
pubmed: 7603001
Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 1998 Sep;37(5):57-60
pubmed: 12456134
Am J Clin Nutr. 1996 May;63(5):797S-811S
pubmed: 8615367
Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2020 Jul 1;2020(7):106625
pubmed: 32457040
PeerJ. 2019 Aug 7;7:e7365
pubmed: 31410305
Genesis. 2017 Jan;55(1-2):
pubmed: 28095616
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 7;13(12):e0208445
pubmed: 30532132
Zoo Biol. 2014 Nov-Dec;33(6):485-501
pubmed: 25296396

Auteurs

Linda F Böswald (LF)

Chair for Animal Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Schönleutnerstr. 8, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany.

Dana Matzek (D)

Biomedical Center, Core Facility Animal Models, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Großhaderner Straße 9, 82152 München, Germany.

Bastian Popper (B)

Biomedical Center, Core Facility Animal Models, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Großhaderner Straße 9, 82152 München, Germany.

Classifications MeSH