Contemporary Management of Male Anterior Urethral Strictures by Reconstructive Urology Experts-Results from an International Survey among ESGURS Members.
anterior urethral strictures
endoscopic surgical procedures
health care surveys
reconstructive surgical procedures
surgical flaps
tissue grafts
urologic surgical procedures
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Apr 2022
22 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
20
02
2022
revised:
30
03
2022
accepted:
19
04
2022
entrez:
14
5
2022
pubmed:
15
5
2022
medline:
15
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Assessment of anterior urethral stricture (US) management of European urology experts is relevant to evaluate the quality of care given to the patients and plan future educational interventions. We assessed the practice patterns of the management of adult male anterior US among reconstructive urology experts from European countries. A 23-question online survey was conducted among European Association of Urology Section of Genito-Urinary Reconstructive Surgeons (ESGURS) members. A total of 88 invitations were sent by email at two different times (May and October 2019). Data were prospectively collected from May 2019 to December 2019. The response rate was 55.6%. Most of the responders were between 50 and 59 y.o. and mainly from University Public Teaching/Academic Hospitals. A total of 73.5% treated ≥20 patients/year with US. Retrograde urethrogram (RUG) was the commonest diagnostic tool, followed by uroflowmetry (UF) +/− post-void residual (PVR). Urethroplasty using grafts was the most frequent treatment (91.8%). Of responders, 55.3% performed >20 urethroplasties/year. Anastomotic urethroplasties were performed by 83.7%, skin flap repairs by 61.2%, perineal urethrostomy by 77.6% and non-transecting techniques by 63.3%. UF was the most common follow-up tool. Most of the responders considered urethroplasty as the primary option when indicated. Male anterior US among ESGURS members are treated mainly using urethroplasty graft procedures. RUG is preferred for diagnosis, and UF for follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35566479
pii: jcm11092353
doi: 10.3390/jcm11092353
pmc: PMC9103897
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Urol. 2007 May;177(5):1667-74
pubmed: 17437780
Eur Urol. 2021 Aug;80(2):190-200
pubmed: 34059397
BJU Int. 2000 Sep;86(5):571-80
pubmed: 10971298
J Urol. 2007 Feb;177(2):685-90
pubmed: 17222657
J Urol. 2004 Jul;172(1):275-7
pubmed: 15201793
Urology. 2014 Dec;84(6):1506-9
pubmed: 25440989
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2020 Mar;44(2):71-77
pubmed: 32005523
Urology. 2015 May;85(5):1190-1194
pubmed: 25746579
Urology. 2011 Sep;78(3):701-6
pubmed: 21762965
J Urol. 2017 Jan;197(1):182-190
pubmed: 27497791
J Urol. 1994 Apr;151(4):869-74
pubmed: 8126813
Urology. 2014 Feb;83(2):477-84
pubmed: 24360068
Urology. 2011 Feb;77(2):481-5
pubmed: 21168194
J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):613-7
pubmed: 20018318
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2009;43(3):220-5
pubmed: 19353382
J Urol. 1998 Aug;160(2):356-8
pubmed: 9679876
Urology. 2011 Aug;78(2):454-8
pubmed: 21689845
J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 29;6(3):e34
pubmed: 15471760
J Urol. 2012 Jun;187(6):2124-7
pubmed: 22503011
Eur Urol. 2021 Aug;80(2):201-212
pubmed: 34103180
Eur Urol. 2008 Nov;54(5):1031-41
pubmed: 18715692
Eur Urol. 2011 Jul;60(1):159-66
pubmed: 21450397
BJU Int. 2005 Jul;96(1):127-30
pubmed: 15963134
J Urol. 1996 Jul;156(1):73-5
pubmed: 8648841
J Urol. 2003 Jul;170(1):90-2
pubmed: 12796652
Urology. 2006 May;67(5):889-93
pubmed: 16698347
J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):179-83
pubmed: 25072180
Urol Int. 2017;99(1):43-50
pubmed: 28601862