Refractive Outcomes of Non-Toric and Toric Intraocular Lenses in Mild, Moderate and Advanced Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
biometry
intraocular lens power calculation formula
keratoconus
refractive error
spherical equivalent
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Apr 2022
27 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
15
02
2022
revised:
15
04
2022
accepted:
18
04
2022
entrez:
14
5
2022
pubmed:
15
5
2022
medline:
15
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the refractive outcomes of non-toric and toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) in keratoconus (KC) using different IOL power calculation formulas. A systematic search was conducted to identify studies that report on refractive outcomes of different IOL power calculation formulas in KC patients undergoing cataract surgery. Inclusion criteria were primary posterior chamber non-toric and toric monofocal intraocular lens implantation, data on the degree of KC, explicit mention of the formula used for each stage of KC, and the number of eyes in each category. We calculated and compared the absolute and mean prediction errors, percentage of eyes within 0.5 D and 1 D from target, and the weighted absolute prediction errors of IOL formulas, all were given for KC degrees I-III. The bibliographic search yielded 582 studies published between 1996 and 2020, 14 of which (in total 456 eyes) met the criteria: three studies on non-toric IOL (98 eyes), eight studies on toric IOLs (98 eyes) and three studies of unknown separation between non-toric and toric IOLs (260 eyes). The lowest absolute prediction error (APE) for mild, moderate, and advanced KC was seen with Kane's IOL power formula with keratoconus adjustment. The APE for the top five IOL power formulas ranged 0.49-0.73 diopters (D) for mild (83-94%) of eyes within 1 D from the target), 1.08-1.21 D for moderate (51-57% within 1 D), and 1.44-2.86 D for advanced KC (12-48% within 1 D). Cataract surgery in eyes with mild-to-moderate KC generally achieves satisfactory postoperative refractive results. In patients with advanced KC, a minority of the eyes achieved spherical equivalent refraction within 1 D from the target. The Kane's formula with keratoconus adjustment showed the best results in all KC stages.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the refractive outcomes of non-toric and toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) in keratoconus (KC) using different IOL power calculation formulas.
METHODS
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted to identify studies that report on refractive outcomes of different IOL power calculation formulas in KC patients undergoing cataract surgery. Inclusion criteria were primary posterior chamber non-toric and toric monofocal intraocular lens implantation, data on the degree of KC, explicit mention of the formula used for each stage of KC, and the number of eyes in each category. We calculated and compared the absolute and mean prediction errors, percentage of eyes within 0.5 D and 1 D from target, and the weighted absolute prediction errors of IOL formulas, all were given for KC degrees I-III.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The bibliographic search yielded 582 studies published between 1996 and 2020, 14 of which (in total 456 eyes) met the criteria: three studies on non-toric IOL (98 eyes), eight studies on toric IOLs (98 eyes) and three studies of unknown separation between non-toric and toric IOLs (260 eyes). The lowest absolute prediction error (APE) for mild, moderate, and advanced KC was seen with Kane's IOL power formula with keratoconus adjustment. The APE for the top five IOL power formulas ranged 0.49-0.73 diopters (D) for mild (83-94%) of eyes within 1 D from the target), 1.08-1.21 D for moderate (51-57% within 1 D), and 1.44-2.86 D for advanced KC (12-48% within 1 D).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Cataract surgery in eyes with mild-to-moderate KC generally achieves satisfactory postoperative refractive results. In patients with advanced KC, a minority of the eyes achieved spherical equivalent refraction within 1 D from the target. The Kane's formula with keratoconus adjustment showed the best results in all KC stages.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35566583
pii: jcm11092456
doi: 10.3390/jcm11092456
pmc: PMC9101494
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Références
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr 01;4(1):e000251
pubmed: 31179396
J Refract Surg. 2011 Sep;27(9):658-64
pubmed: 21667880
Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 May;135(5):620-7
pubmed: 12719068
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Nov;35(11):2024-7
pubmed: 19878840
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Jul;30(7):529-532
pubmed: 33472887
Ophthalmology. 2020 Aug;127(8):1037-1042
pubmed: 32279887
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):e1-34
pubmed: 19631507
Eye Contact Lens. 2015 Nov;41(6):354-8
pubmed: 25946379
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2020 May-Jun;9(3):186-193
pubmed: 32501896
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 1999;12(6-7):314-7
pubmed: 10724575
Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov 02;4(3):219-28
pubmed: 24348406
Eye Contact Lens. 2018 Sep;44 Suppl 1:S87-S91
pubmed: 27749500
Open Ophthalmol J. 2017 Jul 31;11:194-200
pubmed: 28932335
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar;98(3):365-70
pubmed: 24390170
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Aug;42(8):1157-64
pubmed: 27531292
J Refract Surg. 2012 Dec;28(12):884-9
pubmed: 23310966
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Aug;44(8):942-948
pubmed: 30115296
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996 May;22(4):497-500
pubmed: 8733857
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Nov;160(5):851-857.e1
pubmed: 26299537
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018 Jul;38(4):447-455
pubmed: 29572900
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;148(5):760-5
pubmed: 19674732
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Oct;41(10):2190-5
pubmed: 26703295
Cornea. 2014 Mar;33(3):274-9
pubmed: 24452214
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan;29(1):75-80
pubmed: 28961565
Cornea. 2016 Nov;35(11):1427-1433
pubmed: 27387567
Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;95(8):826-833
pubmed: 28692136
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec 3;20(1):475
pubmed: 33272234
Cornea. 2011 Jun;30(6):720-3
pubmed: 21562460
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993 Nov;19(6):700-12
pubmed: 8271165
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;212:26-33
pubmed: 31770511
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 May;45(5):576-581
pubmed: 30799180
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar;98(3):361-4
pubmed: 23966369
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar 15;31(2):127-134
pubmed: 31317089
Yonsei Med J. 2021 Dec;62(12):1117-1124
pubmed: 34816642
Ophthalmology. 2018 Feb;125(2):169-178
pubmed: 28951074
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Jan;46(1):27-33
pubmed: 32050229
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993 Nov;19(6):713-20
pubmed: 8271166
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul;60(4):302-8
pubmed: 27165708
Eye Contact Lens. 2007 Sep;33(5):244-6
pubmed: 17873627
Cornea. 2009 Jan;28(1):40-2
pubmed: 19092403
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Jan;29(1):85-8
pubmed: 12551672
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Oct;42(10):1490-1500
pubmed: 27839605
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988 Jan;14(1):17-24
pubmed: 3339543
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Apr;24(4):456-63
pubmed: 9584238
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990 May;16(3):333-40
pubmed: 2355321
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 May;32(5):742-6
pubmed: 16765789