Evaluation of a Dedicated Radiofrequency Carotid PET/MRI Coil.
PET/MRI
attenuation correction
carotid imaging
flexible MRI coils
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 May 2022
04 May 2022
Historique:
received:
26
01
2022
revised:
27
04
2022
accepted:
02
05
2022
entrez:
14
5
2022
pubmed:
15
5
2022
medline:
15
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Carotid radiofrequency coils inside a PET/MRI system can result in PET quantification errors. We compared the performance of a dedicated PET/MRI carotid coil against a coil for MRI-only use. An 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) phantom was scanned without and with an MRI-only coil and with the PET/MRI coil. The decay-corrected normalized activity was compared for the different coil configurations. Eighteen patients were scanned with the three coil configurations. The maximal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) were calculated. Repeated measures ANOVA was performed to assess the differences in SUVmax and SNR between the coil configurations. In the phantom study, the PET/MRI coil demonstrated a slight decrease (<5%), while the MRI-only coil showed a substantial decrease (up to 10%) in normalized activity at the position of coil elements compared to no dedicated coil configuration. In the patient study, the SUVmax values for both no surface coil (3.59 ± 0.15) and PET/MRI coil (3.54 ± 0.15) were significantly higher (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively) as compared to the MRI-only coil (3.28 ± 0.16). No significant difference was observed between PET/MRI and no surface coil (p = 1.0). The SNR values for both PET/MRI (7.31 ± 0.44) and MRI-only (7.62 ± 0.42) configurations demonstrated significantly higher (p < 0.001) SNR values as compared to the no surface coil (3.78 ± 0.22), while no significant difference was observed in SNR between the PET/MRI and MRI-only coil (p = 1.0). This study demonstrated that the PET/MRI coil can be used for PET imaging without requiring attenuation correction while acquiring high-resolution MR images.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35566694
pii: jcm11092569
doi: 10.3390/jcm11092569
pmc: PMC9101928
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Semin Nucl Med. 2015 May;45(3):212-23
pubmed: 25841276
Med Image Anal. 2017 Dec;42:129-144
pubmed: 28800546
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Feb;39(2):E9-E31
pubmed: 29326139
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Jan 17;63(2):025033
pubmed: 29186008
Med Phys. 2012 Jul;39(7):4306-15
pubmed: 22830764
J Nucl Med. 2017 May;58(5):846-852
pubmed: 28183991
PET Clin. 2016 Apr;11(2):151-60
pubmed: 26952728
Eur Radiol. 2015 Apr;25(4):1154-61
pubmed: 25287263
Magn Reson Med. 2015 Jun;73(6):2363-75
pubmed: 25046699
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Aug 7;55(15):4361-74
pubmed: 20647598
J Nucl Med. 2012 Aug;53(8):1284-91
pubmed: 22743250
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020 Aug;10(4):1120-1139
pubmed: 32968664
Med Phys. 2013 Aug;40(8):082301
pubmed: 23927344
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jul 26;19(15):
pubmed: 31357545
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Jun 21;60(12):4705-17
pubmed: 26020273
Invest Radiol. 2014 Feb;49(2):63-9
pubmed: 24056110
Thromb Haemost. 2018 Aug;118(8):1461-1469
pubmed: 29972860
J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017:2634389
pubmed: 29065582
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Apr 12;64(8):08NT03
pubmed: 30884475