Periodontal Health in Patients with Self-Ligating Brackets: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.
fixed appliance
orthodontic attachment
periodontal disease
periodontal health
self-ligating bracket
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 May 2022
04 May 2022
Historique:
received:
13
04
2022
revised:
27
04
2022
accepted:
03
05
2022
entrez:
14
5
2022
pubmed:
15
5
2022
medline:
15
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis is to assess the available evidence from human clinical studies of using self-ligating brackets compared to conventional brackets in maintaining periodontal health. The protocol details were registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022302689). This review was performed under the PRISMA guidelines. The electronic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and grey literature databases, as well as manual searches to find relevant articles published until January 2022. The inclusion criteria consisted of human clinical studies which reported the use of fixed orthodontic treatment with self-ligating brackets (SLBs) or conventional brackets (CBs) in maintaining periodontal health. A total of 453 studies were imported into the Covidence Platform from the databases. Of these, six articles met the inclusion criteria. For plaque index, statistical significance was achieved for SLBs compared to CBs (0.31 (95% CI (0.15 to 0.48), The present systematic review with meta-analysis was considered to provide relevant data on periodontal health during orthodontic treatment in patients with SLBs in comparison with patients wearing CBs. Our findings indicated that SLBs are not superior to CBs in terms of periodontal health.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis is to assess the available evidence from human clinical studies of using self-ligating brackets compared to conventional brackets in maintaining periodontal health.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
The protocol details were registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022302689). This review was performed under the PRISMA guidelines. The electronic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and grey literature databases, as well as manual searches to find relevant articles published until January 2022. The inclusion criteria consisted of human clinical studies which reported the use of fixed orthodontic treatment with self-ligating brackets (SLBs) or conventional brackets (CBs) in maintaining periodontal health.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 453 studies were imported into the Covidence Platform from the databases. Of these, six articles met the inclusion criteria. For plaque index, statistical significance was achieved for SLBs compared to CBs (0.31 (95% CI (0.15 to 0.48),
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The present systematic review with meta-analysis was considered to provide relevant data on periodontal health during orthodontic treatment in patients with SLBs in comparison with patients wearing CBs. Our findings indicated that SLBs are not superior to CBs in terms of periodontal health.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35566696
pii: jcm11092570
doi: 10.3390/jcm11092570
pmc: PMC9101337
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Références
Quintessence Int. 2018;49(1):69-77
pubmed: 29114647
BMJ. 2015 Jan 02;350:g7647
pubmed: 25555855
Angle Orthod. 2015 May;85(3):468-73
pubmed: 25101909
J Dent. 2016 Nov;54:13-24
pubmed: 27546466
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):260-7
pubmed: 23910207
Int Orthod. 2021 Dec;19(4):523-538
pubmed: 34629309
J Orthod. 2016 Dec;43(4):260-267
pubmed: 27607519
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Apr;143(4 Suppl):S72-7
pubmed: 23540639
Eur J Orthod. 1991 Oct;13(5):416-20
pubmed: 1748191
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Mar-Apr;20(2):35-41
pubmed: 25992985
Angle Orthod. 2010 May;80(3):575-84
pubmed: 20050755
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Feb;153(2):175-183
pubmed: 29407494
Angle Orthod. 2011 Jul;81(4):609-15
pubmed: 21306224
Odontology. 2022 Jul;110(3):460-466
pubmed: 35037112
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;111:105-114
pubmed: 29432858
Angle Orthod. 2014 May;84(3):479-85
pubmed: 24188122
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(14):e0233
pubmed: 29620635
Int J Dent Hyg. 2017 Feb;15(1):16-22
pubmed: 27095145
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Aug;132(2):223-5
pubmed: 17693373
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Jun;32(3):248-53
pubmed: 19959610
Am J Dent. 2010 Dec;23(6):317-23
pubmed: 21344829
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Jan;141(1):24-9
pubmed: 22196182
Angle Orthod. 2019 Jan;89(1):25-32
pubmed: 30239218
J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S74-S84
pubmed: 29926944
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Feb;33(1):15-21
pubmed: 20671070