Comparison of the Antioxidant Activity of Propolis Samples from Different Geographical Regions.
antioxidant activity
flavonoids
phenolic acids
propolis
Journal
Plants (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2223-7747
Titre abrégé: Plants (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101596181
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Apr 2022
29 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
29
03
2022
revised:
25
04
2022
accepted:
27
04
2022
entrez:
14
5
2022
pubmed:
15
5
2022
medline:
15
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Propolis composition depends on several factors. The classification of propolis is based on its geographical location, color and agricultural characteristics. It is also classified according to the flora where the bees collect the resins, which represent the raw material for propolis production. Propolis possesses high antioxidant activity determined by its phenolic compounds. Due to diverse composition and possible impact on human health, eight samples of propolis were evaluated for their phenolic composition and antioxidant activity. Samples of Polish, Romanian, Turkish and Uruguayan origin propolis were used for phenolic spectrum determination using high performance liquid chromatography and photodiode array detection and in vitro DPPH and ABTS methods were used to determine the antioxidant activity of the extracts. PCA and HCA models were applied to evaluate the correlation between isolated polyphenols and antioxidant activity. The results confirmed variability in propolis composition depending on the geographical region of collection and the plant sources, and correlation between chemical composition and antioxidant activity. Results of PCA and HCA analyses confirm that Polish propolis is similar to that from different provinces of Romania, while Turkish and Uruguay are completely different. Polish and Romanian propolis belong to the poplar type. The assessed phenolic compounds of propolis samples used in the study are responsible for its antioxidant effect. The observed antioxidant activity of the analyzed samples may suggest directing subsequent research on prophylactic and therapeutic properties concerning cardiovascular, metabolic, neurodegenerative, and cancerous diseases, which are worth continuing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35567206
pii: plants11091203
doi: 10.3390/plants11091203
pmc: PMC9104821
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Molecules. 2013 Dec 20;19(1):78-101
pubmed: 24362627
Chem Biodivers. 2019 Jul;16(7):e1900094
pubmed: 31099458
J Cancer Sci Ther. 2013 Oct 21;5(10):334-342
pubmed: 24466386
Phytother Res. 2021 Jan;35(1):207-222
pubmed: 32776610
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:159392
pubmed: 23818918
J Agric Food Chem. 2013 May 29;61(21):5080-8
pubmed: 23650897
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2017 Oct;26(7):1143-1146
pubmed: 29211364
Plants (Basel). 2021 Apr 21;10(5):
pubmed: 33919265
Z Naturforsch C J Biosci. 2012 Nov-Dec;67(11-12):545-50
pubmed: 23413747
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2014 Feb;65(1):101-5
pubmed: 24020631
J Agric Food Chem. 2011 Jun 22;59(12):6430-7
pubmed: 21563839
Molecules. 2017 Jan 13;22(1):
pubmed: 28098798
J Agric Food Chem. 2002 Aug 14;50(17):4777-82
pubmed: 12166959
J Food Sci Technol. 2020 Jan;57(1):70-78
pubmed: 31975709
Plants (Basel). 2021 Jul 28;10(8):
pubmed: 34451588
Appl Biol Chem. 2021;64(1):37
pubmed: 33880424
Plants (Basel). 2020 Nov 21;9(11):
pubmed: 33233429
Food Chem. 2015 Aug 1;180:133-141
pubmed: 25766810
Ultrason Sonochem. 2020 Jun;64:105021
pubmed: 32070901
Molecules. 2014 Nov 26;19(12):19610-32
pubmed: 25432012
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 Dec;23(12):1797-803
pubmed: 27517836
Plants (Basel). 2020 Dec 24;10(1):
pubmed: 33374275
J Agric Food Chem. 2005 May 18;53(10):4290-302
pubmed: 15884874
Biomolecules. 2021 Jan 06;11(1):
pubmed: 33419208