Effects of Long-term Hybrid Assistive Limb Use on Gait in Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
cyborg robot
gait ability
hybrid assistive limb
rehabilitation
Journal
Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)
ISSN: 1349-7235
Titre abrégé: Intern Med
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9204241
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
entrez:
15
5
2022
pubmed:
16
5
2022
medline:
20
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Objective To assess the long-term effects of hybrid assistive limb (HAL) treatment on gait in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Methods Three courses of treatment with HAL were administered to three women with ALS. Each course had a four- to five-week duration, during which the treatment was performed nine times, with a rest period of at least two months between each course. Gait ability (2-minutes-walk and 10-m-walk tests), ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised, and respiratory function tests were performed before and after each treatment course. Patients Patients diagnosed with ALS, according to the updated Awaji criteria, by board-certified neurologists in the Department of Neurology and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Toho University Omori Faculty of Medicine between January and December 2019 were recruited. Results The average time from the start to the end of the 3 courses was 319.7±33.7 days. A multiple regression analysis was performed for the 2-minutes-walk and 10-m-walk tests, using the baseline value, each participant's ID, and time point as covariates. Changes after each course were considered outcomes. Following the 3 treatment courses, the 2-minutes walk distance improved by 16.61 m (95% confidence interval, -9.33-42.54) compared with the baseline value, but this improvement was not statistically significant (p=0.21). However, cadence significantly improved by 1.30 steps (95% confidence interval, 0.17-2.42; p=0.02). Conclusion Long-term, repetitive HAL treatments may help patients with ALS maintain their gait.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35569927
doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.8030-21
pmc: PMC9177366
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1479-1484Références
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2017 Jan;6(1):
pubmed: 27911497
J Phys Ther Sci. 2019 Aug;31(8):702-707
pubmed: 31528013
J Phys Ther Sci. 2018 Aug;30(8):1009-1013
pubmed: 30154591
J Neurol Sci. 2001 Oct 15;191(1-2):133-7
pubmed: 11677004
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2013;53(5):287-90
pubmed: 23708218
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Jun 02;11:92
pubmed: 24890413
Front Neurosci. 2017 Aug 08;11:449
pubmed: 28848377
Lancet. 1996 May 25;347(9013):1425-31
pubmed: 8676624
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Jul 7;16(1):304
pubmed: 34233722
J Neurol Sci. 2019 Sep 15;404:11-15
pubmed: 31323516
J Neurol Sci. 2017 Feb 15;373:182-187
pubmed: 28131185
World Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;110:e73-e78
pubmed: 29081392
BMC Neurol. 2013 Oct 07;13:141
pubmed: 24099524
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Nov;95(11):2006-12
pubmed: 25010538
Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 2019 Mar 28;59(3):157-159
pubmed: 30814446
Brain Res. 2010 Feb 8;1313:192-201
pubmed: 19968977
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1015:1-15
pubmed: 29080018
NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40(3):363-367
pubmed: 28222558
Front Syst Neurosci. 2015 Mar 25;9:48
pubmed: 25859191
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Jul;127(7):2684-91
pubmed: 27212114
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2015;55(6):487-92
pubmed: 26041627
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Jul;16(7):505-512
pubmed: 28522181
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Aug 20;12:68
pubmed: 26289818