Neural network-assisted automated image registration for MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in cervical cancer.
Auto Segmentation
Brachytherapy
Deep Learning
Image registration
Journal
Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik
ISSN: 1876-4436
Titre abrégé: Z Med Phys
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 100886455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
02
02
2022
revised:
19
03
2022
accepted:
14
04
2022
pubmed:
16
5
2022
medline:
21
12
2022
entrez:
15
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) a quantitative evaluation of the dosimetric changes between fractions due to anatomical variations, can be implemented via rigid registration of images from subsequent fractions based on the applicator as a reference structure. With available treatment planning systems (TPS), this is a manual and time-consuming process. The aim of this retrospective study was to automate this process. A neural network (NN) was trained to predict the applicator structure from MR images. The resulting segmentation was used to automatically register MR-volumes. DICOM images and plans of 56 patients treated for cervical cancer with high dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy were used in the study. A 2D and a 3D NN were trained to segment applicator structures on clinical T2-weighted MRI datasets. Different rigid registration algorithms were investigated and compared. To evaluate a fully automatic registration workflow, the NN-predicted applicator segmentations (AS) were used for rigid image registration with the best performing algorithm. The DICE coefficient and mean distance error between dwell positions (MDE) were used to evaluate segmentation and registration performance. The mean DICE coefficient for the predicted AS was 0.70 ± 0.07 and 0.58 ± 0.04 for the 3D NN and 2D NN, respectively. Registration algorithms achieved MDE errors from 8.1 ± 3.7 mm (worst) to 0.7 ± 0.5 mm (best), using ground-truth AS. Using the predicted AS from the 3D NN together with the best registration algorithm, an MDE of 2.7 ± 1.4 mm was achieved. Using a combination of deep learning models and state of the art image registration techniques has been demonstrated to be a promising solution for automatic image registration in IGABT. In combination with auto-contouring of organs at risk, the auto-registration workflow from this study could become part of an online-dosimetric interfraction evaluation workflow in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35570099
pii: S0939-3889(22)00057-5
doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.04.002
pmc: PMC9948828
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
488-499Subventions
Organisme : Austrian Science Fund FWF
ID : KLI 695
Pays : Austria
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier GmbH.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [Department of Radiation Oncology at Medical University of Vienna receives financial and/or equipment support for research and educational purposes from Elekta AB. CK, AS and NN received travel support and honoraria for educational activities from Elekta AB. YN is an employee of Elekta AB.]
Références
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2020 Oct;30(4):311-327
pubmed: 32828387
Front Neuroinform. 2014 Jan 16;7:50
pubmed: 24474917
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Sep;120(3):390-396
pubmed: 27452410
Med Phys. 2012 Feb;39(2):951-63
pubmed: 22320804
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Aug 14;64(16):165008
pubmed: 31272095
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Nov;93(2):347-51
pubmed: 19625096
J ICRU. 2013 Apr;13(1-2):NP
pubmed: 27335496
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Oct;21(10):158-169
pubmed: 32991783
Radiother Oncol. 2021 Jul;160:273-284
pubmed: 34019918
Front Oncol. 2019 Oct 01;9:977
pubmed: 31632910
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jan 11;9:48-60
pubmed: 29594251
Radiother Oncol. 2013 Apr;107(1):20-5
pubmed: 23602372
Z Med Phys. 2019 May;29(2):102-127
pubmed: 30553609
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Feb;143:1-11
pubmed: 31564555
Radiother Oncol. 2008 Nov;89(2):156-63
pubmed: 18692265
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Jan;29(1):196-205
pubmed: 19923044
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Apr;22(4):538-547
pubmed: 33794207
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Dec;141:123-129
pubmed: 31495516
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Dec;153:55-66
pubmed: 32920005
Radiother Oncol. 2010 Aug;96(2):153-60
pubmed: 20663578
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jun 1;65(2):624-30
pubmed: 16690444
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Jan;110(1):199-212
pubmed: 24299968
Med Phys. 2019 Oct;46(10):4324-4332
pubmed: 31329302
Br J Radiol. 2017 May;90(1073):20160667
pubmed: 28256898
Radiother Oncol. 2013 Apr;107(1):75-81
pubmed: 23068712
J Digit Imaging. 2019 Aug;32(4):582-596
pubmed: 31144149
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul;29(3):185-197
pubmed: 31027636