Robot-assisted gait training in patients with Parkinson's disease: Implications for clinical practice. A systematic review.


Journal

NeuroRehabilitation
ISSN: 1878-6448
Titre abrégé: NeuroRehabilitation
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9113791

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
pubmed: 17 5 2022
medline: 11 1 2023
entrez: 16 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Gait impairments are common disabling symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Among the approaches for gait rehabilitation, interest in robotic devices has grown in recent years. However, the effectiveness compared to other interventions, the optimum amount of training, the type of device, and which patients might benefit most remains unclear. To conduct a systematic review about the effects on gait of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) in PD patients and to provide advice for clinical practice. A search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, PEDro, Cochrane library, Web of science, and guideline databases, following PRISMA guidelines. We included English articles if they used a robotic system with details about the intervention, the parameters, and the outcome measures. We evaluated the level and quality of evidence. We included twenty papers out of 230 results: two systematic reviews, 9 randomized controlled trials, 4 uncontrolled studies, and 5 descriptive reports. Nine studies used an exoskeleton device and the remainders end-effector robots, with large variability in terms of subjects' disease-related disability. RAGT showed benefits on gait and no adverse events were recorded. However, it does not seem superior to other interventions, except in patients with more severe symptoms and advanced disease.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Gait impairments are common disabling symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Among the approaches for gait rehabilitation, interest in robotic devices has grown in recent years. However, the effectiveness compared to other interventions, the optimum amount of training, the type of device, and which patients might benefit most remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To conduct a systematic review about the effects on gait of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) in PD patients and to provide advice for clinical practice.
METHODS METHODS
A search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, PEDro, Cochrane library, Web of science, and guideline databases, following PRISMA guidelines. We included English articles if they used a robotic system with details about the intervention, the parameters, and the outcome measures. We evaluated the level and quality of evidence.
RESULTS RESULTS
We included twenty papers out of 230 results: two systematic reviews, 9 randomized controlled trials, 4 uncontrolled studies, and 5 descriptive reports. Nine studies used an exoskeleton device and the remainders end-effector robots, with large variability in terms of subjects' disease-related disability.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
RAGT showed benefits on gait and no adverse events were recorded. However, it does not seem superior to other interventions, except in patients with more severe symptoms and advanced disease.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35570502
pii: NRE220026
doi: 10.3233/NRE-220026
doi:

Types de publication

Systematic Review Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

649-663

Auteurs

Simona Maria Carmignano (SM)

Centro Terapeutico Riabilitativo (CTR), Potenza, Italy.
University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.

Cira Fundarò (C)

Neurophysiopatology Unit, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, IRCCS Montescano, Pavia, Italy.

Donatella Bonaiuti (D)

Piero Redaelli Geriatric Institute, Milan, Italy.

Rocco Salvatore Calabrò (RS)

IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo", Messina, Italy.

Anna Cassio (A)

Spinal Cord Unit and Intensive Rehabilitation Medicine, Ospedale di Fiorenzuola d'Arda, AUSL Piacenza, Piacenza, Italy.

Davide Mazzoli (D)

Gait and Motion Analysis Laboratory, Sol et Salus Ospedale Privato Accreditato, Rimini, Italy.

Emiliana Bizzarini (E)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Spinal Cord Unit, Gervasutta Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASU FC), Udine, Italy.

Isabella Campanini (I)

Department of Neuromotor and Rehabilitation, LAM-Motion Analysis Laboratory, San Sebastiano Hospital, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Simona Cerulli (S)

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Carmelo Chisari (C)

Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, Neurorehabiltation Section, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Valentina Colombo (V)

Montecatone Rehabilitation Institute, Imola, Italy.

Stefania Dalise (S)

Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, Neurorehabiltation Section, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Valeria Gazzotti (V)

Centro Protesi Vigorso di Budrio, Istituto Nazionale Assicurazione Infortuni sul Lavoro (INAIL), Bologna, Italy.

Daniele Mazzoleni (D)

School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Miryam Mazzucchelli (M)

School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Corrado Melegari (C)

Elias Neuroriabilitazione, Parma, Italy.

Andrea Merlo (A)

Gait and Motion Analysis Laboratory, Sol et Salus Ospedale Privato Accreditato, Rimini, Italy.
Department of Neuromotor and Rehabilitation, LAM-Motion Analysis Laboratory, San Sebastiano Hospital, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Giulia Stampacchia (G)

Spinal Cord Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.

Paolo Boldrini (P)

Italian Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (SIMFER), Rome, Italy.

Stefano Mazzoleni (S)

Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy.

Federico Posteraro (F)

Department of Rehabilitation, Versilia Hospital - AUSL12, Viareggio, Italy.

Paolo Benanti (P)

Pontifical Gregorian University, Rome, Italy.

Enrico Castelli (E)

Department of Paediatric Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Francesco Draicchio (F)

Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL, Rome, Italy.

Vincenzo Falabella (V)

Italian Federation of Persons with Spinal Cord Injuries (FAIP Onlus), Rome, Italy.

Silvia Galeri (S)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.

Francesca Gimigliano (F)

Department of Mental, Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.

Mauro Grigioni (M)

National Center for Innovative Technologies in Public Health, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.

Stefano Mazzon (S)

Rehabilitation Unit, ULSS (Local Health Authority) Euganea, Camposampiero Hospital, Padua, Italy.

Franco Molteni (F)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center, Valduce Hospital, Lecco, Italy.

Giovanni Morone (G)

IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.

Maurizio Petrarca (M)

Movement Analysis and Robotics Laboratory (MARlab), IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Alessandro Picelli (A)

Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Michele Senatore (M)

Associazione Italiana dei Terapisti Occupazionali (AITO), Rome, Italy.

Giuseppe Turchetti (G)

Institute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.

Elisa Andrenelli (E)

Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH