Potential of «universal» bonding agents for composite repair.

Composite repair bonding agent composite-to-composite restoration repair shear bond strength

Journal

Biomaterial investigations in dentistry
ISSN: 2641-5275
Titre abrégé: Biomater Investig Dent
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101755000

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
entrez: 16 5 2022
pubmed: 17 5 2022
medline: 17 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this Cylindrical composite substrates were made according to manufacturers' specifications and potted in epoxy according to the description in ISO TS 29022:2003. They were stored in water (37 °C) for 2 months (for water sorption). New composite was bonded to the substrates using nine different bonding agents of universal type, and one 3-step etch-and-rinse bonding agent as control. Fifteen specimens were made for each bonding agent as required by ISO 29022. SBS testing was performed as described in the standard. Vertical load was applied at the speed of 1 mm/min, using a universal testing machine. Two test series were performed: (A) Short term test of SBS after 2 weeks (B) Long term test of SBS after 1-year storage of specimens in water at 37 °C. Test results for the short term test (A); composite-to-composite SBS mean values ranged from 12.0 to 24.9 MPa, and for the long term test (B), SBS ranged from 11.4 to 25 MPa. Six universal bonding agents showed significantly higher bond strength than control in 1-year test. In this

Identifiants

pubmed: 35571874
doi: 10.1080/26415275.2022.2073234
pii: 2073234
pmc: PMC9103618
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

41-46

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Références

Dent Mater. 2011 Jan;27(1):17-28
pubmed: 21109301
J Dent Res. 2012 Apr;91(4):351-7
pubmed: 22173327
J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(1):7-34
pubmed: 32030373
J Dent. 2015 Jul;43(7):765-76
pubmed: 25882585
J Dent Res. 2005 Feb;84(2):183-8
pubmed: 15668338
J Dent. 2016 Sep;52:50-4
pubmed: 27421988
Dent Mater. 2016 Oct;32(10):1218-1225
pubmed: 27461880
Dent Mater. 2018 Jul;34(7):1072-1081
pubmed: 29716740
Dent Mater. 2011 Jan;27(1):1-16
pubmed: 21112620
J Dent. 2019 Jul;86:1-16
pubmed: 31108118
Dent Mater. 2010 Feb;26(2):e100-21
pubmed: 20006379
Int Dent J. 2000 Feb;50(1):1-12
pubmed: 10945174
Int Dent J. 2015 Dec;65(6):311-5
pubmed: 26453196
Dent Mater. 2005 Sep;21(9):864-81
pubmed: 16009415
J Dent. 2018 Feb;69:1-21
pubmed: 28943362
Curr Oral Health Rep. 2018;5(4):264-269
pubmed: 30524930
Eur J Oral Sci. 2011 Aug;119(4):316-22
pubmed: 21726294
J Dent. 2015 May;43(5):525-36
pubmed: 25797702
J Oral Sci. 2019;61(2):343-350
pubmed: 31217385
Dent Update. 2007 Jan-Feb;34(1):9-10, 12-4, 17-8
pubmed: 17348554
Dent Mater. 2008 Jan;24(1):90-101
pubmed: 17442386
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2014 Oct 17;6:81-7
pubmed: 25378952

Auteurs

Frode Staxrud (F)

Clinical Research, NIOM: Nordic Institute of Dental Materials, Oslo, Norway.

Håkon Valen (H)

Clinical Research, NIOM: Nordic Institute of Dental Materials, Oslo, Norway.

Classifications MeSH