Reducing Changeover Time Between Surgeries Through Lean Thinking: An Action Research Project.
changeover time
inter-professional collaboration
lean thinking
operating room
standardization
surgery
weekly management
Journal
Frontiers in medicine
ISSN: 2296-858X
Titre abrégé: Front Med (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101648047
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
26
11
2021
accepted:
05
04
2022
entrez:
16
5
2022
pubmed:
17
5
2022
medline:
17
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Maximizing the utilization of the operating room suite by safely and efficiently changing over patients is an opportunity to deliver more value to patients and be more efficient in the operating suite. Lean Thinking is a concept that focuses on the waste inadvertently generated during organization and development of an activity, which should maximize customer value while minimizing waste. It has been widely applied to increase process efficiency and foster continuous improvement in healthcare and in the operating room environment. The objective of this paper is to provide insight on how healthcare professionals can be engaged in continuous improvement by embracing Lean Thinking and ultimately reducing changeover time between surgeries. Using an action research approach, Lean methodology such as Gemba walks, Process Mapping, Root-Cause-Analysis, and the Single Minute Exchange of Dies (SMED) system was applied to understand the causes of variability and wastes concerning changeovers and improve processes in the context of gynecological- and general surgery. Data were collected and analyzed through observations and video recordings. Problem and issue have been raised to management team attention and included in the annual balanced scorecard of the hospital. This initiative has been also made relevant to the team working in the operating suite and related processes before and after the entry of the patient in the operating suite. Improved patient flow and inter-professional collaboration through standardized and safer work enabled effective parallel processing and allowed the hospital to reduce changeover time between operations by 25% on average, without changes in terms of infrastructure, technology or resources. Lean thinking allowed the team to re-evaluate how the whole operating suite performs as a system, by starting from a sub-process as changeover. It is fundamental in order to improve further and obtain sustainable results over time, to act on a system level by defining a common goal between all stakeholders supported by a management and leading system such as visual/weekly management, optimizing planning, implementing standard-works to be followed by every associate and guaranteeing the role of the surgeon as process driver who pull performances.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Maximizing the utilization of the operating room suite by safely and efficiently changing over patients is an opportunity to deliver more value to patients and be more efficient in the operating suite. Lean Thinking is a concept that focuses on the waste inadvertently generated during organization and development of an activity, which should maximize customer value while minimizing waste. It has been widely applied to increase process efficiency and foster continuous improvement in healthcare and in the operating room environment. The objective of this paper is to provide insight on how healthcare professionals can be engaged in continuous improvement by embracing Lean Thinking and ultimately reducing changeover time between surgeries.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Using an action research approach, Lean methodology such as Gemba walks, Process Mapping, Root-Cause-Analysis, and the Single Minute Exchange of Dies (SMED) system was applied to understand the causes of variability and wastes concerning changeovers and improve processes in the context of gynecological- and general surgery. Data were collected and analyzed through observations and video recordings. Problem and issue have been raised to management team attention and included in the annual balanced scorecard of the hospital. This initiative has been also made relevant to the team working in the operating suite and related processes before and after the entry of the patient in the operating suite.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Improved patient flow and inter-professional collaboration through standardized and safer work enabled effective parallel processing and allowed the hospital to reduce changeover time between operations by 25% on average, without changes in terms of infrastructure, technology or resources.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Lean thinking allowed the team to re-evaluate how the whole operating suite performs as a system, by starting from a sub-process as changeover. It is fundamental in order to improve further and obtain sustainable results over time, to act on a system level by defining a common goal between all stakeholders supported by a management and leading system such as visual/weekly management, optimizing planning, implementing standard-works to be followed by every associate and guaranteeing the role of the surgeon as process driver who pull performances.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35573003
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.822964
pmc: PMC9091348
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
822964Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Amati, Valnegri, Bressan, La Regina, Tassone, Lo Piccolo, Mongelli and Saporito.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
AORN J. 2010 Jul;92(1):53-60
pubmed: 20619772
Chest. 2018 Dec;154(6):1448-1454
pubmed: 29909284
Anesthesiology. 2006 Aug;105(2):237-40
pubmed: 16871055
J Health Organ Manag. 2015;29(6):729-49
pubmed: 26394255
Ann Surg. 2006 Jan;243(1):15-6
pubmed: 16371731
J Allied Health. 2010 Fall;39 Suppl 1:196-7
pubmed: 21174039
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008 May;52(5):596-600
pubmed: 18419711
Ann Surg. 2006 Jan;243(1):10-4
pubmed: 16371730
Crit Care Nurse. 2018 Jun;38(3):e1-e7
pubmed: 29858202
AORN J. 2006 Nov;84(5):849-55
pubmed: 17144053
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(23):iii-157
pubmed: 11785749
Int J Surg. 2016 Jun;30:83-9
pubmed: 27109202
J Surg Res. 2016 Aug;204(2):371-383
pubmed: 27565073
ANZ J Surg. 2013 Jul;83(7-8):545-8
pubmed: 23186117