Identification of major candidate genes for multiple abiotic stress tolerance at seedling stage by network analysis and their validation by expression profiling in rice (
Co-expression and network analysis
Common abiotic stress-tolerance mechanisms
Hub genes
Rice
Journal
3 Biotech
ISSN: 2190-572X
Titre abrégé: 3 Biotech
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101565857
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
15
02
2021
accepted:
03
04
2022
entrez:
16
5
2022
pubmed:
17
5
2022
medline:
17
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A wealth of microarray and RNA-seq data for studying abiotic stress tolerance in rice exists but only limited studies have been carried out on multiple stress-tolerance responses and mechanisms. In this study, we identified 6657 abiotic stress-responsive genes pertaining to drought, salinity and heat stresses from the seedling stage microarray data of 83 samples and used them to perform unweighted network analysis and to identify key hub genes or master regulators for multiple abiotic stress tolerance. Of the total 55 modules identified from the analysis, the top 10 modules with 8-61 nodes comprised 239 genes. From these 10 modules, 10 genes common to all the three stresses were selected. Further, based on the centrality properties and highly dense interactions, we identified 7 intra-modular hub genes leading to a total of 17 potential candidate genes. Out of these 17 genes, 15 were validated by expression analysis using a panel of 4 test genotypes and a pair of standard check genotypes for each abiotic stress response. Interestingly, all the 15 genes showed upregulation under all stresses and in all the genotypes, suggesting that they could be representing some of the core abiotic stress-responsive genes. More pertinently, eight of the genes were found to be co-localized with the stress-tolerance QTL regions. Thus, in conclusion, our study not only provided an effective approach for studying abiotic stress tolerance in rice, but also identified major candidate genes which could be further validated by functional genomics for abiotic stress tolerance. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-022-03182-7.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35573803
doi: 10.1007/s13205-022-03182-7
pii: 3182
pmc: PMC9098736
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
127Informations de copyright
© King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2022.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interestThe authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Trends Plant Sci. 2015 Oct;20(10):664-675
pubmed: 26440435
New Phytol. 2014 Jul;203(1):32-43
pubmed: 24720847
Bioinformatics. 2009 Apr 15;25(8):1091-3
pubmed: 19237447
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D447-52
pubmed: 25352553
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Mar 06;10:193
pubmed: 30894866
Genes (Basel). 2019 Sep 17;10(9):
pubmed: 31533315
BMC Genet. 2011 Oct 18;12:89
pubmed: 22008150
Genetica. 2008 Jun;133(2):187-200
pubmed: 17823843
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26162
pubmed: 22046259
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Nov 04;5:598
pubmed: 25408696
Plant Physiol. 2014 Jan;164(1):481-95
pubmed: 24235132
F1000Res. 2014 Jul 01;3:139
pubmed: 26594322
Physiol Plant. 2022 Jan;174(1):e13606
pubmed: 34837237
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22196
pubmed: 21799793
AoB Plants. 2015 Mar 27;7:
pubmed: 25818072
Genes Brain Behav. 2014 Jan;13(1):13-24
pubmed: 24320616
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Sep 30;18(1):432
pubmed: 28964253
Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2009 Dec;13(5-6):532-8
pubmed: 19837627
Plants (Basel). 2019 Sep 26;8(10):
pubmed: 31561513
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jun 15;8:1044
pubmed: 28663756
BMC Syst Biol. 2010 May 03;4:56
pubmed: 20438628
Plant Physiol. 2006 Jan;140(1):12-7
pubmed: 16403737
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 10;8(10):e77261
pubmed: 24130868
Plant Cell. 2016 Oct;28(10):2365-2384
pubmed: 27655842
J Exp Bot. 2004 Jan;55(395):225-36
pubmed: 14673035
Brief Bioinform. 2018 Jul 20;19(4):575-592
pubmed: 28077403
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Feb 03;23(3):
pubmed: 35163659
Rice (N Y). 2015 Dec;8(1):59
pubmed: 26206757
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 02;10(3):e0118731
pubmed: 25730421
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 17;11(6):e0157522
pubmed: 27314499
Funct Integr Genomics. 2020 Jan;20(1):29-49
pubmed: 31286320
Rice (N Y). 2021 Jun 5;14(1):49
pubmed: 34089405
Genome Res. 2003 Nov;13(11):2498-504
pubmed: 14597658
Mol Plant. 2013 Mar;6(2):250-60
pubmed: 23292878
Theor Appl Genet. 2005 Oct;111(6):1127-36
pubmed: 16075205
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Apr 20;8:581
pubmed: 28473838
Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8
pubmed: 11846609
J Genet Genomics. 2017 May 20;44(5):235-241
pubmed: 28529082
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 18;9(1):6273
pubmed: 31000746
Nat Commun. 2014 Oct 31;5:5302
pubmed: 25358745
BMC Plant Biol. 2017 Nov 7;17(1):194
pubmed: 29115926
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2013 Dec;23(6):611-21
pubmed: 24238873
Theor Appl Genet. 2004 Oct;109(6):1237-46
pubmed: 15490102
BMC Bioinformatics. 2003 Jan 13;4:2
pubmed: 12525261
Genes (Basel). 2018 Nov 29;9(12):
pubmed: 30501128
Plant Direct. 2019 Aug 12;3(8):e00154
pubmed: 31417977
Theor Appl Genet. 2012 Feb;124(2):323-32
pubmed: 21938473
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jun 06;8:934
pubmed: 28634483
Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2002 Jan;29(1):50-5
pubmed: 11838375