A Systematic Review of Clinical Guidelines for Preconception Care.


Journal

Seminars in reproductive medicine
ISSN: 1526-4564
Titre abrégé: Semin Reprod Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100909394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 17 5 2022
medline: 2 8 2022
entrez: 16 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Preconception care (PCC) involves a wide-ranging set of interventions to optimize health prior to pregnancy. These interventions seek to enhance conception rates, pregnancy outcomes, childhood health, and the health of future generations. To assist health care providers to exercise high-quality clinical care in this domain, clinical practice guidelines from a range of settings have been published. This systematic review sought to identify existing freely accessible international guidelines, assess these in terms of their quality using the AGREE II tool, and assess the summary recommendations and the evidence level on which they are based. We identified 11 guidelines that focused on PCC. Ten of these were classified as moderate quality (scores ranging from 3.5 to 4.5 out of 7) and only one was classified as very high quality, scoring 6.5. The levels of evidence for recommendations ranged from the lowest possible level of evidence (III) to the highest (I-a): the highest quality evidence available is for folic acid supplementation to reduce risk of neural tube defects and the role of antiviral medication to prevent HIV transmission. This systematic review identified that high-quality guidelines on PCC are lacking and that few domains of PCC recommendations are supported by high-quality evidence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35576970
doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1748190
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

157-169

Informations de copyright

Thieme. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

We declare that we received no financial or other support or any financial or professional relationships which may pose a competing interest.

Auteurs

Edwina Dorney (E)

Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Jacqueline A Boyle (JA)

Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Ruth Walker (R)

Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Karin Hammarberg (K)

Global and Women's Health, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.

Loretta Musgrave (L)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Danielle Schoenaker (D)

School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Brian Jack (B)

NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Kirsten I Black (KI)

Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH