Global loss of Neuron-specific gene 1 causes alterations in motor coordination, increased anxiety, and diurnal hyperactivity in male mice.
AMPA receptors
Calcyon
NSG2
neuronal endosomal-enriched protein 21 kDa (NEEP21)
synaptic plasticity
Journal
Genes, brain, and behavior
ISSN: 1601-183X
Titre abrégé: Genes Brain Behav
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101129617
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
revised:
03
05
2022
received:
03
03
2022
accepted:
04
05
2022
pubmed:
17
5
2022
medline:
9
7
2022
entrez:
16
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Neuron-specific gene family (NSG1-3) consists of small endolysosomal proteins that are critical for trafficking multiple receptors and signaling molecules in neurons. NSG1 has been shown to play a critical role in AMPAR recycling from endosomes to plasma membrane during synaptic plasticity. However, to date nothing is known about whether NSG1 is required for normal behavior at an organismal level. Here we performed a battery of behavioral tests to determine whether loss of NSG1 would affect motor, cognitive, and/or affective behaviors, as well as circadian-related activity. Consistent with unique cerebellar expression of NSG1 among family members, we found that NSG1 was obligatory for motor coordination but not for gross motor function or learning. NSG1 knockout (KO) also altered performance across other behavioral modalities including anxiety-related and diurnal activity paradigms. Surprisingly, NSG1 KO did not cause significant impairments across all tasks within a given modality, but had specific effects within each modality. For instance, we found increases in anxiety-related behaviors in tasks with multiple stressors (e.g., elevation and exposure), but not those with a single main stressor (e.g., exposure). Interestingly, NSG1 KO animals displayed a significant increase in locomotor activity during subjective daytime, suggesting a possible impact on diurnal activity rhythms or vigilance. Surprisingly, loss of NSG1 had no effect on hippocampal-dependent learning despite previous studies showing deficits in CA1 long-term potentiation. Together, these findings do not support a role of NSG1 in hippocampal-dependent learning, but support a role in mediating proper neuronal function across amygdalar and cerebellar circuits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35577358
doi: 10.1111/gbb.12816
pmc: PMC9262855
mid: NIHMS1804274
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e12816Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R21 NS093442
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS083378
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : P20 GM109089
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAAA NIH HHS
ID : P50 AA022534
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS116051
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAAA NIH HHS
ID : F32 AA022268
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Genes, Brain and Behavior published by International Behavioural and Neural Genetics Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Neuroreport. 2007 Oct 8;18(15):1547-51
pubmed: 17885599
Eur J Neurosci. 2010 Jul;32(2):269-77
pubmed: 20646058
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol. 1968;259(2):211
pubmed: 4232694
Front Cell Neurosci. 2015 Jan 06;8:441
pubmed: 25610371
Mol Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;20(10):1251-60
pubmed: 25349163
J Cell Biol. 2008 Feb 25;180(4):827-42
pubmed: 18299352
Mol Cell Neurosci. 2005 Jun;29(2):313-9
pubmed: 15911354
Physiol Behav. 1987;39(5):579-86
pubmed: 3588702
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2001 May;25(3):235-60
pubmed: 11378179
Mol Psychiatry. 2011 Jun;16(6):672-84
pubmed: 21403673
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1997 Nov;21(6):801-10
pubmed: 9415905
J Neurosci Methods. 2009 Jan 15;176(1):34-44
pubmed: 18805438
Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Jan;29(1):42-54
pubmed: 19120439
J Neurosci. 2015 Aug 12;35(32):11330-45
pubmed: 26269640
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Jun;29(5):343-8
pubmed: 17805436
J Neurosci. 2002 Mar 15;22(6):2215-24
pubmed: 11896161
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 5;7(1):10481
pubmed: 28874679
Genes Brain Behav. 2022 Jul;21(6):e12816
pubmed: 35577358
J Biol Chem. 2004 Aug 20;279(34):35687-91
pubmed: 15187090
Behav Brain Res. 2008 Jun 3;189(2):244-9
pubmed: 18295356
EMBO J. 2005 Aug 17;24(16):2873-84
pubmed: 16037816
J Neurochem. 2015 Jan;132(1):20-31
pubmed: 25376768
J Neurosci. 2010 Nov 17;30(46):15677-85
pubmed: 21084623
Science. 1986 Apr 25;232(4749):513-5
pubmed: 3961494
J Mol Evol. 2009 Oct;69(4):319-32
pubmed: 19760447
J Biol Chem. 1995 Jan 27;270(4):1888-93
pubmed: 7829526
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2012 Mar;36(3):457-66
pubmed: 21933200
J Comp Neurol. 2017 Jun 1;525(8):1861-1878
pubmed: 28299779
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 14;10(10):e0140010
pubmed: 26465886
J Biol Chem. 1998 Feb 13;273(7):3909-14
pubmed: 9461575
Brain Struct Funct. 2015 Nov;220(6):3513-36
pubmed: 25139623
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994 Sep;116(1):56-64
pubmed: 7862931
Genes Brain Behav. 2021 Jan;20(1):e12652
pubmed: 32144885
J Vis Exp. 2008 Dec 22;(22):
pubmed: 19229173
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2011 Jan;97(3):406-15
pubmed: 20869983
eNeuro. 2019 Jan 24;6(1):
pubmed: 30680309
J Biol Chem. 2006 Jun 2;281(22):15182-93
pubmed: 16595675