Accuracy of emergency medical service telephone triage of need for an ambulance response in suspected COVID-19: an observational cohort study.
COVID-19
accident & emergency medicine
risk management
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 05 2022
16 05 2022
Historique:
entrez:
16
5
2022
pubmed:
17
5
2022
medline:
20
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To assess accuracy of emergency medical service (EMS) telephone triage in identifying patients who need an EMS response and identify factors which affect triage accuracy. Observational cohort study. Emergency telephone triage provided by Yorkshire Ambulance Service (YAS) National Health Service (NHS) Trust. 12 653 adults who contacted EMS telephone triage services provided by YAS between 2 April 2020 and 29 June 2020 assessed by COVID-19 telephone triage pathways were included. Accuracy of call handler decision to dispatch an ambulance was assessed in terms of death or need for organ support at 30 days from first contact with the telephone triage service. Callers contacting EMS dispatch services had an 11.1% (1405/12 653) risk of death or needing organ support. In total, 2000/12 653 (16%) of callers did not receive an emergency response and they had a 70/2000 (3.5%) risk of death or organ support. Ambulances were dispatched to 4230 callers (33.4%) who were not conveyed to hospital and did not deteriorate. Multivariable modelling found variables of older age (1 year increase, OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.05) and presence of pre-existing respiratory disease (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.60) to be predictors of false positive triage. Telephone triage can reduce ambulance responses but, with low specificity. A small but significant proportion of patients who do not receive an initial emergency response deteriorated. Research to improve accuracy of EMS telephone triage is needed and, due to limitations of routinely collected data, this is likely to require prospective data collection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35577471
pii: bmjopen-2021-058628
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058628
pmc: PMC9114316
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e058628Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Fam Pract. 2011 Jun;28(3):334-41
pubmed: 21106645
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 Mar;2(3):e154-e162
pubmed: 33733245
CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95
pubmed: 16129869
BMJ Open. 2019 May 28;9(5):e026471
pubmed: 31142524
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021 Jan-Feb;25(1):28-38
pubmed: 32870754
JAMA. 2021 Aug 3;326(5):376-377
pubmed: 34259836
QJM. 2015 Jul;108(7):533-8
pubmed: 25519233
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 May 1;21(1):55
pubmed: 33932980
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Mar 29;21(1):39
pubmed: 33781229
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Mar 30;:
pubmed: 35354665
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 1;166(3):752-4
pubmed: 23084108
Emerg Med J. 2021 Aug;38(8):587-593
pubmed: 34083427
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 Aug 02;2(4):e12492
pubmed: 34378000
Emerg Med J. 2016 Sep;33(9):665-70
pubmed: 27044949
Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Apr;9(4):288-95
pubmed: 11927452
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0245840
pubmed: 33481930
BMJ. 2012 Mar 01;344:e1001
pubmed: 22381521
Emerg Med J. 2021 Jun;38(6):446-449
pubmed: 33832923
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 25;15(11):e0240206
pubmed: 33237907