Comparison of Performances of Adalimumab Biosimilars SB5, ABP501, GP2017, and MSB11022 in Treating Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Real-Life, Multicenter, Observational Study.


Journal

Inflammatory bowel diseases
ISSN: 1536-4844
Titre abrégé: Inflamm Bowel Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9508162

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 03 2023
Historique:
received: 24 01 2022
pubmed: 18 5 2022
medline: 4 3 2023
entrez: 17 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Adalimumab (ADA) biosimilars have entered the therapeutic armamentarium of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), allowing for the treatment of a greater number of patients for their reduced cost than the originator. However, comparative data on the efficacy and safety of the various ADA biosimilars remains scarce.We compare the efficacy and safety of ADA biosimilars SB5, ABP501, GP2017, and MSB11022 in treating IBD outpatients in a real-life Italian setting. A retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive IBD outpatients with complete clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic data. Clinical activity was measured using the Mayo score in ulcerative colitis (UC) and the Harvey-Bradshaw Index in Crohn's disease (CD). The primary endpoints were the following: (1) induction of remission in patients new to biologics and patients new to ADA but previously exposed to other anti-tumor necrosis factor agents or other biologics; (2) maintenance of remission in patients switched from the ADA originator to an ADA biosimilar; and (3) safety of various biosimilars. A total of 533 patients were enrolled according to the inclusion criteria: 162 patients with UC and 371 patients with CD. Clinical remission was obtained in 79.6% of patients new to biologics and 59.2% of patients new to ADA but not to other biologics; clinical remission was maintained in 81.0% of patients switched from the originator, and adverse events were recorded in 6.7% of patients. There was no significant difference between the 4 ADA biosimilars for each predetermined endpoint. Adalimumab biosimilars are effective and safe in IBD treatment, both in new patients and in patients switched from the ADA originator. No difference in efficacy and safety was found between ADA biosimilars. We treated 533 IBD patients with adalimumab (ADA) biosimilars SB5, APB501, GP2017, and MSB11022. No differences between these 4 ADA biosimilars were found for reaching remission in naive patients, maintaining remission for nonmedical switching, clinical response, steroid-free remission, surgery rate, mucosal healing, or safety.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Adalimumab (ADA) biosimilars have entered the therapeutic armamentarium of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), allowing for the treatment of a greater number of patients for their reduced cost than the originator. However, comparative data on the efficacy and safety of the various ADA biosimilars remains scarce.We compare the efficacy and safety of ADA biosimilars SB5, ABP501, GP2017, and MSB11022 in treating IBD outpatients in a real-life Italian setting.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive IBD outpatients with complete clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic data. Clinical activity was measured using the Mayo score in ulcerative colitis (UC) and the Harvey-Bradshaw Index in Crohn's disease (CD). The primary endpoints were the following: (1) induction of remission in patients new to biologics and patients new to ADA but previously exposed to other anti-tumor necrosis factor agents or other biologics; (2) maintenance of remission in patients switched from the ADA originator to an ADA biosimilar; and (3) safety of various biosimilars.
RESULTS
A total of 533 patients were enrolled according to the inclusion criteria: 162 patients with UC and 371 patients with CD. Clinical remission was obtained in 79.6% of patients new to biologics and 59.2% of patients new to ADA but not to other biologics; clinical remission was maintained in 81.0% of patients switched from the originator, and adverse events were recorded in 6.7% of patients. There was no significant difference between the 4 ADA biosimilars for each predetermined endpoint.
CONCLUSIONS
Adalimumab biosimilars are effective and safe in IBD treatment, both in new patients and in patients switched from the ADA originator. No difference in efficacy and safety was found between ADA biosimilars.
We treated 533 IBD patients with adalimumab (ADA) biosimilars SB5, APB501, GP2017, and MSB11022. No differences between these 4 ADA biosimilars were found for reaching remission in naive patients, maintaining remission for nonmedical switching, clinical response, steroid-free remission, surgery rate, mucosal healing, or safety.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
We treated 533 IBD patients with adalimumab (ADA) biosimilars SB5, APB501, GP2017, and MSB11022. No differences between these 4 ADA biosimilars were found for reaching remission in naive patients, maintaining remission for nonmedical switching, clinical response, steroid-free remission, surgery rate, mucosal healing, or safety.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35579320
pii: 6586753
doi: 10.1093/ibd/izac092
doi:

Substances chimiques

GP2017 0
Adalimumab FYS6T7F842
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals 0

Types de publication

Observational Study Multicenter Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

376-383

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Antonio Tursi (A)

Territorial Gastroenterology Service, ASL BAT, Andria, Italy.
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Post-graduate School of Digestive Diseases, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.

Giammarco Mocci (G)

Division of Gastroenterology, "Brotzu" Hospital, Cagliari, Italy.

Leonardo Allegretta (L)

Division of Gastroenterology, "Santa Caterina Novella" Hospital, Galatina (LE), Italy.

Giovanni Aragona (G)

Division of Gastroenterology, "Guglielmo da Saliceto" Hospital, Piacenza, Italy.

Maria Antonia Bianco (MA)

Division of Gastroenterology, "T. Maresca" Hospital, Torre del Greco (NA), Italy.

Raffaele Colucci (R)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, "San Matteo degli Infermi" Hospital, Spoleto (PG), Italy.

Antonio Cuomo (A)

Division of Gastroenterology, "Umberto I" Hospital, Nocera Inferiore (SA), Italy.

Nicola Della Valle (N)

Division of Gastroenterology, "Ospedali Riuniti" Hospital, Foggia, Italy.

Antonio Ferronato (A)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ULSS7 Pedemontana, Santorso (VI), Italy.

Giacomo Forti (G)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, "S. Maria Goretti" Hospital, Latina, Italy.

Federica Gaiani (F)

Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.

GianMarco Giorgetti (G)

Digestive Endoscopy and Nutritional Unit, "S. Eugenio" Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Maria Giovanna Graziani (MG)

Division of Gastroenterology, "S. Giovanni - Addolorata" Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Katia Lofano (K)

Division of Gastroenterology, "S. Paolo" Hospital, Bari, Italy.

Roberto Lorenzetti (R)

Division of Gastroenterology, "Nuovo Regina Margherita" Territorial Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Tiziana Larussa (T)

Department of Health Science, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.

Antonio Penna (A)

Territorial Gastroenterology Service, ASL BA, Bari, Italy.

Roberta Pica (R)

Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Unit, "S. Pertini" Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Giuseppe Pranzo (G)

Ambulatory for IBD Treatment, "Valle D'Itria" Hospital, Martina Franca (TA), Italy.

Stefano Rodino' (S)

Division of Gastroenterology, "Ciaccio-Pugliese" Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy.

Antonella Scarcelli (A)

Division of Gastroenterology, "San Salvatore" Hospital, Pesaro, Italy.

Costantino Zampaletta (C)

Division of Gastroenterology, "Belcolle" Hospital, Viterbo, Italy.

Gabrio Bassotti (G)

Gastroenterology & Hepatology Section, Department of Medicine & Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Alessia Immacolata Cazzato (AI)

Division of Gastroenterology, "Santa Caterina Novella" Hospital, Galatina (LE), Italy.

Stefania Chiri (S)

Division of Gastroenterology, "Santa Caterina Novella" Hospital, Galatina (LE), Italy.

Valeria Clemente (V)

Digestive Endoscopy and Nutritional Unit, "S. Eugenio" Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Andrea Cocco (A)

Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Unit, "S. Pertini" Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Gianluigi De' Angelis (G)

Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.

Laura Donnarumma (L)

Division of Gastroenterology, "Umberto I" Hospital, Nocera Inferiore (SA), Italy.

Roberto Faggiani (R)

Division of Gastroenterology, "S. Camillo" Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Camilla Graziosi (C)

Division of Gastroenterology, "Belcolle" Hospital, Viterbo, Italy.

Marco Le Grazie (M)

Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.

Francesco Luzza (F)

Department of Health Science, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.

Costantino Meucci (C)

Division of Gastroenterology, "T. Maresca" Hospital, Torre del Greco (NA), Italy.

Rita Monterubbianesi (R)

Division of Gastroenterology, "S. Camillo" Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Cristiano Pagnini (C)

Division of Gastroenterology, "S. Giovanni - Addolorata" Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Patrizia Perazzo (P)

Division of Gastroenterology, "Santa Caterina Novella" Hospital, Galatina (LE), Italy.

Marcello Picchio (M)

Division of General Surgery, "P. Colombo" Hospital, ASL Roma 6, Velletri (Roma), Italy.

Rodolfo Sacco (R)

Division of Gastroenterology, "Ospedali Riuniti" Hospital, Foggia, Italy.

Ladislava Sebkova (L)

Division of Gastroenterology, "Ciaccio-Pugliese" Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy.

Mariaelena Serio (M)

Division of Gastroenterology, "Ciaccio-Pugliese" Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy.

Daniele Napolitano (D)

Division of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy.

Daniela Pugliese (D)

Division of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy.

Franco Scaldaferri (F)

Division of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Catholic University, School of Medicine, Rome, Italy.

Elisa Schiavoni (E)

Division of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy.

Laura Turchini (L)

Division of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy.

Alessandro Armuzzi (A)

IBD Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Walter Elisei (W)

Division of Gastroenterology, "S. Camillo" Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Giovanni Maconi (G)

Division of Gastroenterology, "L. Sacco" University Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Alfredo Papa (A)

Division of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Catholic University, School of Medicine, Rome, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH