High defibrillation threshold with right-sided ICD implantation was resolved by a dual coil lead via persistent left superior vena cava.
CS, coronary sinus
Coronary sinus
DFT, defibrillation threshold
Defibrillation test
EF, ejection fraction
High defibrillation threshold
ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator
LV, left ventricular
PLSVC, persistent left superior vena cava
Persistent left superior vena cava
SVC, superior vena cava
VF, ventricular fibrillation
Journal
Journal of cardiology cases
ISSN: 1878-5409
Titre abrégé: J Cardiol Cases
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101549579
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
received:
01
06
2021
revised:
30
09
2021
accepted:
27
10
2021
entrez:
18
5
2022
pubmed:
19
5
2022
medline:
19
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) can be problematic when device implantation is scheduled from the left side because of the technical difficulty in delivering leads. Right-sided implantation is an alternative method, but there is a risk of a high defibrillation threshold (DFT). Transvenous implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) was scheduled for a 54-year-old man with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and monomorphic non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, but computed tomography revealed the presence of a PLSVC. Right-sided ICD implantation was performed first; however, an ICD shock at 35 J failed to terminate the induced ventricular fibrillation (VF). Re-implantation via the PLSVC by a left subclavian approach with a dual coil lead was performed next. The dual coil right ventricular lead was successfully implanted via the PLSVC, and the induced VF was terminated by a single shock at 25 J. In the present case, the proximal coil was located in the coronary sinus (CS) and it enabled an antero-posterior defibrillation vector across the left ventricle. In addition to the re-location of the ICD generator from the right side to the left side, the new positioning of the proximal coil inside the CS is likely to have contributed to the great improvement of the DFT. <
Identifiants
pubmed: 35582083
doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2021.10.012
pii: S1878-5409(21)00176-6
pmc: PMC9091524
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
262-265Informations de copyright
© 2021 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interests for this article.
Références
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 22;64(3):256-64
pubmed: 25034061
Neth Heart J. 2008 Aug;16(7-8):272-4
pubmed: 18711618
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 May;31(5):1175-1181
pubmed: 32237003
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 May;30(5):675-700
pubmed: 17461879
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2020 Dec 10;7(3):153-156
pubmed: 33786310
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Sep;35(9):e274-5
pubmed: 22650311
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jul 15;100(2):243-6
pubmed: 17631078
Acta Cardiol. 2018 Jun;73(3):267-273
pubmed: 28885097
J Arrhythm. 2018 Dec 03;35(1):79-85
pubmed: 30805047
Circ J. 2015;79(1):77-84
pubmed: 25391259