The impact of post-hospital remote monitoring of COVID-19 patients using pulse oximetry: A national observational study using hospital activity data.
COVID-19
Observational study
Pulse oximetry
Remote monitoring
Virtual wards
Journal
EClinicalMedicine
ISSN: 2589-5370
Titre abrégé: EClinicalMedicine
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101733727
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
10
01
2022
revised:
12
04
2022
accepted:
20
04
2022
entrez:
18
5
2022
pubmed:
19
5
2022
medline:
19
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There was a national roll out of 'COVID Virtual Wards' (CVW) during England's second COVID-19 wave (Autumn 2020 - Spring 2021). These services used remote pulse oximetry monitoring for COVID-19 patients following discharge from hospital. A key aim was to enable rapid detection of patient deterioration. It was anticipated that the services would support early discharge, reducing pressure on beds. This study is an evaluation of the impact of the CVW services on hospital activity. Using retrospective patient-level hospital admissions data, we built multivariate models to analyze the relationship between the implementation of CVW services and hospital activity outcomes: length of COVID-19 related stays and subsequent COVID-19 readmissions within 28 days. We used data from more than 98% of recorded COVID-19 hospital stays in England, where the patient was discharged alive between mid-August 2020 and late February 2021. We found a longer length of stay for COVID-19 patients discharged from hospitals where a CVW was available, when compared to patients discharged from hospitals where there was no CVW (adjusted IRR 1·05, 95% CI 1·01 to 1·09). We found no evidence of a relationship between the availability of CVW and subsequent rates of readmission for COVID-19 (adjusted OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91 to 1·03). We found no evidence of early discharges or changes in readmissions associated with the roll out of COVID Virtual Wards across England. Our analysis made pragmatic use of national-scale hospital data, but it is possible that a lack of specific data (for example, on which patients were enrolled and on potentially important confounders) may have meant that true impacts, especially at a local level, were not ultimately discernible. It is important that future research is able to make use of better quality - preferably linked - data, from multiple sites. This is independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research, Health Services & Delivery Research program (RSET Project no. 16/138/17; BRACE Project no. 16/138/31) and NHSE&I. NJF is an NIHR Senior Investigator.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
There was a national roll out of 'COVID Virtual Wards' (CVW) during England's second COVID-19 wave (Autumn 2020 - Spring 2021). These services used remote pulse oximetry monitoring for COVID-19 patients following discharge from hospital. A key aim was to enable rapid detection of patient deterioration. It was anticipated that the services would support early discharge, reducing pressure on beds. This study is an evaluation of the impact of the CVW services on hospital activity.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Using retrospective patient-level hospital admissions data, we built multivariate models to analyze the relationship between the implementation of CVW services and hospital activity outcomes: length of COVID-19 related stays and subsequent COVID-19 readmissions within 28 days. We used data from more than 98% of recorded COVID-19 hospital stays in England, where the patient was discharged alive between mid-August 2020 and late February 2021.
Findings
UNASSIGNED
We found a longer length of stay for COVID-19 patients discharged from hospitals where a CVW was available, when compared to patients discharged from hospitals where there was no CVW (adjusted IRR 1·05, 95% CI 1·01 to 1·09). We found no evidence of a relationship between the availability of CVW and subsequent rates of readmission for COVID-19 (adjusted OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91 to 1·03).
Interpretation
UNASSIGNED
We found no evidence of early discharges or changes in readmissions associated with the roll out of COVID Virtual Wards across England. Our analysis made pragmatic use of national-scale hospital data, but it is possible that a lack of specific data (for example, on which patients were enrolled and on potentially important confounders) may have meant that true impacts, especially at a local level, were not ultimately discernible. It is important that future research is able to make use of better quality - preferably linked - data, from multiple sites.
Funding
UNASSIGNED
This is independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research, Health Services & Delivery Research program (RSET Project no. 16/138/17; BRACE Project no. 16/138/31) and NHSE&I. NJF is an NIHR Senior Investigator.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35582125
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101441
pii: S2589-5370(22)00171-7
pmc: PMC9098201
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101441Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Funding for this study was provided by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and NHS England and Improvement and payments made to the institutions of all the authors. The authors have no other competing interests.
Références
BMJ. 2020 Jun 4;369:m2119
pubmed: 32499317
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 31;11(1):7310
pubmed: 33790365
Cureus. 2021 Jan 29;13(1):e12979
pubmed: 33659119
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021 Jun;17(6):315-332
pubmed: 33903743
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jul;37:100965
pubmed: 34179736
Cleve Clin J Med. 2020 Jun 11;:
pubmed: 32409432
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 12;17(16):
pubmed: 32806775
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Aug 1;46(4):1093-1093i
pubmed: 28338941
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Nov;74(11):964-968
pubmed: 32535550
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Nov 1;27(11):1825-1827
pubmed: 32667985
BMC Res Notes. 2021 Sep 26;14(1):374
pubmed: 34565442
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Mar;45:101318
pubmed: 35252824
J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211000231
pubmed: 33729040
Telemed J E Health. 2021 Oct;27(10):1188-1193
pubmed: 33320031
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Apr;34:100799
pubmed: 33817610
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2052-2059
pubmed: 32320003
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 2;11(1):13733
pubmed: 34215803
BMJ. 2021 Mar 31;372:n693
pubmed: 33789877
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 30;13(4):e0196114
pubmed: 29708997
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
Acute Med. 2020;19(4):183-191
pubmed: 33215171
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 23;11(3):e045356
pubmed: 33757955
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Oct;11(5):792-801
pubmed: 33241547
Popul Health Manag. 2022 Feb;25(1):86-90
pubmed: 34516237
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jan 07;31:100683
pubmed: 33490928