Policy programs and service delivery models for older adults and their caregivers: Comparing three provinces and two states.
comparative analysis
comparative policy
dementia
incrementalism
older adults
policy analysis
policy layering
Journal
Health & social care in the community
ISSN: 1365-2524
Titre abrégé: Health Soc Care Community
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9306359
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
revised:
14
03
2022
received:
11
06
2021
accepted:
12
04
2022
pubmed:
19
5
2022
medline:
20
12
2022
entrez:
18
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite an increase in prevalence of complex chronic conditions and dementia, long-term care services are being continuously pushed out of institutional settings and into the home and community. The majority of people living with dementia in Canada and the United States (U.S.) live at home with support provided by family, friends or other unpaid caregivers. Ten dementia care policy programs and service delivery models across five different North American jurisdictions in Canada and the U.S. are compared deductively using a comparative policy framework originally developed by Richard Rose. One aim of this research was to understand how different jurisdictions have worked to reduce the fragmentation of dementia care. Another aim is to assess, relying on the theory of smart policy layering, the extent to which these policy efforts 'patch' health system structures or add to system redundancies. We find that these programs were introduced in a manner that did not fully consider how to patch current programs and services and thus risk creating further system redundancies. The implementation of these policy programs may have led to policy layers, and potentially to tension among different policies and unintended consequences. One approach to reducing these negative impacts is to implement evaluative efforts that assess 'goodness of fit'. The degree to which these programs have embedded these efforts into an existing policy infrastructure successfully is low, with the possible exception of one program in NY.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35582789
doi: 10.1111/hsc.13820
pmc: PMC10083929
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e4264-e4279Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 150705
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Health and Social Care in the Community published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Lancet. 1994 Oct 22;344(8930):1129-33
pubmed: 7934497
Milbank Q. 2011 Jun;89(2):256-88
pubmed: 21676023
Can J Aging. 2009 Dec;28(4):359-70
pubmed: 19925701
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;20(6):537-46
pubmed: 15920707
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 May-Jun;20(3):116-31
pubmed: 11585159
Can Fam Physician. 2011 Dec;57(12):1387-91, e460-4
pubmed: 22170190
Int J Integr Care. 2017 Jun 27;17(2):15
pubmed: 28970756
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e4264-e4279
pubmed: 35582789
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2005 Sep;18(3):119-28
pubmed: 16100100
Health Policy. 2016 Jul;120(7):732-8
pubmed: 27160481
Healthc Policy. 2018 Aug;14(1):30-43
pubmed: 30129433
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Oct;24(5):525-31
pubmed: 22864107
Healthc Q. 2014;17(3):30-5
pubmed: 25591607
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Oct;34(10):1642-9
pubmed: 26438739
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2016 Mar;31(2):181-3
pubmed: 26142293
Health Policy. 2019 Feb;123(2):215-221
pubmed: 30583803
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 May;28(5):603-4
pubmed: 23377845
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 Mar;7(2):208-44
pubmed: 21414557
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Nov 12;18(1):275
pubmed: 30419819
West J Nurs Res. 2005 Mar;27(2):126-40; discussion 141-7
pubmed: 15695566
Health Policy. 2018 Nov;122(11):1260-1265
pubmed: 30278991
Int J Integr Care. 2014 Mar 10;14:e001
pubmed: 24648834
Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2017 Aug;7(4):261-270
pubmed: 28853640
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Feb 22;7(2):e56
pubmed: 29472178
Healthc Pap. 2009;10(1):8-21
pubmed: 20057212
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2012 Apr;5(2):123-9
pubmed: 21846081
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2008;27(2):75-99
pubmed: 18928206