The quality of primary care performance in private sector facilities in Nairobi, Kenya: a cross-sectional descriptive survey.
Accessibility
Comprehensiveness
Continuity
Coordination
Performance
Primary care
Primary health care
Quality
Service delivery
Journal
BMC primary care
ISSN: 2731-4553
Titre abrégé: BMC Prim Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918300889006676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 05 2022
18 05 2022
Historique:
received:
12
09
2021
accepted:
06
04
2022
entrez:
18
5
2022
pubmed:
19
5
2022
medline:
21
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Integrated health services with an emphasis on primary care are needed for effective primary health care and achievement of universal health coverage. The key elements of high quality primary care are first-contact access, continuity, comprehensiveness, coordination, and person-centredness. In Kenya, there is paucity of information on the performance of these key elements and such information is needed to improve service delivery. Therefore, the study aimed to evaluate the quality of primary care performance in private sector facilities in Nairobi, Kenya. A cross-sectional descriptive study using an adapted Primary Care Assessment Tool for the Kenyan context and surveyed 412 systematically sampled primary care users, from 13 PC clinics. Data were analysed to measure 11 domains of primary care performance and two aggregated primary care scores using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences. Mean primary care score was 2.64 (SD=0.23) and the mean expanded primary care score was 2.68 (SD=0.19), implying an overall low performance. The domains of first contact-utilisation, coordination (information system), family-centredness and cultural competence had mean scores of >3.0 (acceptable to good performance). The domains of first contact-access, coordination, comprehensiveness (provided and available), ongoing care and community-orientation had mean scores of < 3.0 (poor performance). Older respondents (p=0.05) and those with higher affiliation to the clinics (p=0.01) were more likely to rate primary care as acceptable to good. These primary care clinics in Nairobi showed gaps in performance. Performance was rated as acceptable-to-good for first-contact utilisation, the information systems, family-centredness and cultural competence. However, patients rated low performance related to first-contact access, ongoing care, coordination of care, comprehensiveness of services, community orientation and availability of a complete primary health care team. Performance could be improved by deploying family physicians, increasing the scope of practice to become more comprehensive, incentivising use of these PC clinics rather than the tertiary hospital, improving access after-hours and marketing the use of the clinics to the practice population.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Integrated health services with an emphasis on primary care are needed for effective primary health care and achievement of universal health coverage. The key elements of high quality primary care are first-contact access, continuity, comprehensiveness, coordination, and person-centredness. In Kenya, there is paucity of information on the performance of these key elements and such information is needed to improve service delivery. Therefore, the study aimed to evaluate the quality of primary care performance in private sector facilities in Nairobi, Kenya.
METHODS
A cross-sectional descriptive study using an adapted Primary Care Assessment Tool for the Kenyan context and surveyed 412 systematically sampled primary care users, from 13 PC clinics. Data were analysed to measure 11 domains of primary care performance and two aggregated primary care scores using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences.
RESULTS
Mean primary care score was 2.64 (SD=0.23) and the mean expanded primary care score was 2.68 (SD=0.19), implying an overall low performance. The domains of first contact-utilisation, coordination (information system), family-centredness and cultural competence had mean scores of >3.0 (acceptable to good performance). The domains of first contact-access, coordination, comprehensiveness (provided and available), ongoing care and community-orientation had mean scores of < 3.0 (poor performance). Older respondents (p=0.05) and those with higher affiliation to the clinics (p=0.01) were more likely to rate primary care as acceptable to good.
CONCLUSION
These primary care clinics in Nairobi showed gaps in performance. Performance was rated as acceptable-to-good for first-contact utilisation, the information systems, family-centredness and cultural competence. However, patients rated low performance related to first-contact access, ongoing care, coordination of care, comprehensiveness of services, community orientation and availability of a complete primary health care team. Performance could be improved by deploying family physicians, increasing the scope of practice to become more comprehensive, incentivising use of these PC clinics rather than the tertiary hospital, improving access after-hours and marketing the use of the clinics to the practice population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35585488
doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01700-3
pii: 10.1186/s12875-022-01700-3
pmc: PMC9114290
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
120Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Can Fam Physician. 2007 Jun;53(6):1057, 2001:e.1-6, 1056
pubmed: 17872786
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Nov 1;98(11):781-791
pubmed: 33177775
BMC Public Health. 2010 Jul 06;10:397
pubmed: 20602806
Asia Pac Fam Med. 2018 May 29;17:4
pubmed: 29853781
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 5;12(1):e0169241
pubmed: 28056038
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2015 Jun 19;7(1):e1-e11
pubmed: 26245610
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2018 Oct 04;10(1):e1-e7
pubmed: 30326721
Hum Resour Health. 2015 Dec 04;13:93
pubmed: 26637305
S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2020 Oct 22;62(1):e1-e12
pubmed: 33179953
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Sep 13;4(Suppl 8):e001496
pubmed: 31565424
Lancet. 2016 Aug 6;388(10044):606-12
pubmed: 27358251
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2007 Oct;26(4):36-46
pubmed: 20433095
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug 14;13:309
pubmed: 23941179
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 May 16;19(1):63
pubmed: 29769022
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2018 Sep 05;10(1):e1-e11
pubmed: 30198287
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 2;19(1):275
pubmed: 31046750
Fam Pract. 2013 Oct;30(5):568-75
pubmed: 23759366
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 20;9(8):e105360
pubmed: 25141191
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2014;6(1):E1-4
pubmed: 26468553
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Aug 06;16:97
pubmed: 26246080
Milbank Q. 2017 Dec;95(4):836-883
pubmed: 29226448
Health Serv Res. 2002 Jun;37(3):529-50
pubmed: 12132594
BMJ. 2014 Nov 11;349:g6485
pubmed: 25389154
BMJ. 2003 Nov 22;327(7425):1219-21
pubmed: 14630762
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Oct;16(10):668-74
pubmed: 11679034
Hum Resour Health. 2014 Jan 21;12:3
pubmed: 24443978
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Nov 1;98(11):812-814
pubmed: 33177779
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2020 Sep 21;12(1):e1-e4
pubmed: 33054269
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Nov 29;19(1):186
pubmed: 30497398
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2016 May 19;8(1):e1-e12
pubmed: 27247157
Health Policy Plan. 2007 May;22(3):167-77
pubmed: 17400576
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):872
pubmed: 30458765
Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Feb;49(439):111-3
pubmed: 10326262
BJGP Open. 2020 Oct 27;4(4):
pubmed: 32900707
Can Fam Physician. 2014 Apr;60(4):e230-6
pubmed: 24733343
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Dec 1;88(12):943-8
pubmed: 21124720
Lancet. 2018 Oct 20;392(10156):1461-1472
pubmed: 30343860