Room of Hazards: A Comparison of Differences in Safety Hazard Recognition Among Various Hospital-Based Healthcare Professionals and Trainees in a Simulated Patient Room.


Journal

Journal of patient safety
ISSN: 1549-8425
Titre abrégé: J Patient Saf
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101233393

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 09 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 20 5 2022
medline: 24 8 2022
entrez: 19 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Adverse events in hospitals are common. While studies have used simulated patient rooms to assess healthcare trainees' skills in detecting safety hazards, few have explored the characteristics of safety hazards that make them more or less identifiable to healthcare workers. We sought to determine differences in hospital-based safety hazard identification among physicians, nurses, and other staff members. Healthcare workers were invited to identify safety hazards in a simulated patient room with intentionally placed hazards. Responses were transcribed and compared between physicians (MD), nurses (RN), and other hospital-based healthcare professionals and trainees (other). Data were analyzed using nonparametric statistical analysis. Twelve physicians, 29 nurses, and 26 other staff members participated in this study. Different professions identified different numbers of total hazards with nurses identifying more hazards than other professions (RN: 9.59, MD: 9.17, other: 6.35; P = 0.001). All professions had difficulty identifying hazards associated with omission (e.g., no precaution sign: MD: 8.3%, RN: 3.4%, other: 0%) or hazards requiring 2-step logical thinking (e.g., intravenous heparin for patient with head laceration: MD: 0%, RN: 6.9%, other: 0%). Physicians, nurses, and others identified different numbers of total hazards, and few participants identified hazards associated with omission or 2-step logical thinking. While previous studies have found differences in types of hazards identified among different healthcare members, we identified hazards that were collectively challenging for all participants to identify. Future studies should target identification of these types of hazards, using human factor engineering to decrease risk of patient harm.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35587392
doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001043
pii: 01209203-202209000-00016
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

624-629

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors disclose no conflict of interest.

Références

Donaldson MS, Corrigan JM, Kohn LT. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System . Vol 6: Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2000.
VHA National Center for Patient Safety. Available at: https://www.patientsafety.va.gov/PATIENTSAFETY/about/index.asp . Accessed 5/17/21, 2021.
Shekelle PG, Ortiz E, Rhodes S, et al. Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality clinical practice guidelines: how quickly do guidelines become outdated? JAMA . 2001;286:1461–1467.
Farnan JM, Gaffney S, Poston JT, et al. Patient safety room of horrors: a novel method to assess medical students and entering residents’ ability to identify hazards of hospitalisation. BMJ Qual Saf . 2016;25:153–158.
Shekhter I, Rosen L, Sanko J, et al. A patient safety course for preclinical medical students. Clin Teach . 2012;9:376–381.
Zimmermann C, Fridrich A, Schwappach DLB. Training situational awareness for patient safety in a room of horrors: an evaluation of a low-fidelity simulation method. J Patient Saf . 2020;17:e1026–e1033.
Clay AS, Chudgar SM, Turner KM, et al. How prepared are medical and nursing students to identify common hazards in the intensive care unit? Ann Am Thorac Soc . 2017;14:543–549.
Wang M, Bilan VP, McCullough M, et al. Room of hazards: an interprofessional evaluation of safety risks in a simulated patient room. J Patient Saf . 2020;18:e329–e337.
Marte A, Strauss E, Phillips DP. Patient safety room assessing orthopedic surgery interns’ abilities to identify patient safety hazards. Bull Hosp Jt Dis . 2013;77:122–127.
Durant DJ. Can patient-reported room cleanliness measures predict hospital-acquired C. difficile infection? A study of acute care facilities in New York state. Am J Infect Control . 2021;49:452–457.
Kardes FR, Pfeiffer BE, Bechkoff JR. Omission neglect in consumer psychology. Int J Psychol Res . 2012;7:23.

Auteurs

Melinda Wang (M)

From the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven.

Barbara Banda (B)

VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH