Outcome of transcanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy with endonasal augmentation in acute versus post-acute dacryocystitis.
Journal
Eye (London, England)
ISSN: 1476-5454
Titre abrégé: Eye (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8703986
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2023
04 2023
Historique:
received:
17
03
2022
accepted:
10
05
2022
revised:
29
03
2022
pmc-release:
01
04
2024
medline:
17
4
2023
pubmed:
20
5
2022
entrez:
19
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To study the outcomes of transcanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy (TCL-DCR) with endonasal augmentation in acute versus post-acute dacryocystitis and compare it with external DCR in post-acute settings. A prospective, randomised study was conducted in 90 adult cases of Acute dacryocystitis. All the patients were started on systemic antibiotics and a 4 mm × 4 mm osteotomy was created using TCL-DCR. The osteotomy was enlarged to 8 mm × 8 mm by endonasal augmentation at the same sitting in group 1, after 10 days in group 2 and after 10 days with external DCR in group 3. The cases were assessed for symptomatic relief and complications. Success was defined as functional and anatomical patency at 36 months. The mean age was 45.33 ± 15.06 years and the male: female ratio was 1:2. The presenting complaints were painful swelling (100%), epiphora or discharge (88.8%), fistula (33%) and fever (6%). The average number of acute episodes was 2.96. The intra-group pain reduction from day 1 to day 4, was significant in all three groups (p = 0.000). Intra-operative (p = 0.015, χ The creation of osteotomy using TCL-DCR provides early relief in symptoms. Single-stage surgery in inflamed tissues is associated with higher complication rates. External DCR in post-acute settings gives the best outcomes with minimal complications, endoscopic augmentation requires a close follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35590102
doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02104-4
pii: 10.1038/s41433-022-02104-4
pmc: PMC10101941
doi:
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1225-1230Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists.
Références
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jul-Aug;23(4):302-6
pubmed: 17667103
Semin Ophthalmol. 2015 Mar;30(2):118-23
pubmed: 24171807
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;12(3):251-253
pubmed: 28791055
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2018;50:130-134
pubmed: 30118963
Rhinology. 2014 Dec;52(4):413-8
pubmed: 25479225
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Jun;150(6):1071-7
pubmed: 24647640
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jul/Aug;33(4):285-288
pubmed: 27505272
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jan;28(1):69-71
pubmed: 24526863
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec 1;135(12):1361-1366
pubmed: 29121183
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Apr;133(4):340-3
pubmed: 17438247
Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jul;136(1):203-4
pubmed: 12834700
Laryngoscope. 2016 Mar;126(3):551-3
pubmed: 25994372
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jul;146(1):60-68
pubmed: 18439559
Am J Otolaryngol. 2008 May-Jun;29(3):177-9
pubmed: 18439951
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;12(3):290-295
pubmed: 28791062
Ophthalmology. 2002 Aug;109(8):1575-82
pubmed: 12153814
Orbit. 2011 Jan;30(1):1-6
pubmed: 21281068
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002 Feb;30(1):44-6
pubmed: 11885795
Ophthalmology. 1998 Jun;105(6):1106-13
pubmed: 9627664
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jan-Feb;31(1):13-8
pubmed: 24833456
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993 Jun;9(2):125-31
pubmed: 8323904
Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jan;88(1):139-41
pubmed: 14693791
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 May;17(3):180-3
pubmed: 11388383
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Nov-Dec;25(6):455-7
pubmed: 19935248
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov/Dec;33(6):408-412
pubmed: 27768643
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;9(1):38-41; discussion 42
pubmed: 8443113
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jul-Aug;31(4):293-5
pubmed: 25226100