Graphical comparison of surgeon outcomes for the audit of a national corneal transplant registry (OTAG study 32).
Journal
Eye (London, England)
ISSN: 1476-5454
Titre abrégé: Eye (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8703986
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2023
04 2023
Historique:
received:
31
01
2022
accepted:
09
05
2022
revised:
09
04
2022
pmc-release:
01
04
2024
medline:
17
4
2023
pubmed:
20
5
2022
entrez:
19
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare Kaplan-Meier survival curves and funnel plots for the audit of surgeon-specific corneal transplantation outcomes. We obtained data on all patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) receiving a first corneal transplant in one eye between January 2012 and December 2017. We produced 2-year Kaplan-Meier graft survival curves to compare a simulated individual surgeon's graft survival rate to national pooled data. We used funnel plots to compare all surgeon outcomes to the national graft survival rate with superimposed 95 and 99.8% confidence limits. We defined an outlier as a surgeon who performed ≥10 transplants and had graft survival below the 99.8% national lower limit. To assess the effect of the surgeon case mix, we also compared unadjusted and risk-adjusted graft survival rates. There were 3616 first corneal transplants for FED patients with complete data, performed or overseen by 196 surgeons. The 2-year national graft survival rate was 88%. The median change from the unadjusted to the risk-adjusted graft survival rate for individual surgeons was 0% (IQR: 0%- -2%). Of the 108 surgeons who had performed ≥10 transplants, we identified two outliers based on the unadjusted graft survival funnel plot, compared to four outliers based on the risk-adjusted graft survival funnel plot. Funnel plots provide a visually accessible method for comparing individual graft survival rates to the national rate. Risk-adjustment accounts for clinical factors, and this has advantages for audit and clinical governance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35590105
doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02100-8
pii: 10.1038/s41433-022-02100-8
pmc: PMC10101946
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1236-1241Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists.
Références
Stat Med. 1993 May 15;12(9):809-24
pubmed: 8327801
Transplantation. 2008 Dec 27;86(12):1720-4
pubmed: 19104411
Eye (Lond). 2011 Aug;25(8):1010-5
pubmed: 21546922
Biom J. 2021 Jun;63(5):915-947
pubmed: 33624862
Transplantation. 2011 Feb 15;91(3):354-9
pubmed: 21079549
Liver Transpl. 2010 Oct;16(10):1119-28
pubmed: 20879010
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 May;104(5):729-734
pubmed: 31462418
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec;158(6):1239-46
pubmed: 25174894
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Feb 10;55(2):784-91
pubmed: 24334443
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;158(5):957-66
pubmed: 25089353
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug 1;136(8):859-865
pubmed: 29931227
BMJ. 2004 Aug 21;329(7463):450-4
pubmed: 15321906