Radiographic Analysis of Graft Dimensional Changes in Transcrestal Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Retrospective Study.
biomaterials
maxillary sinus
sinus augmentation
transcrestal procedure
xenograft
Journal
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Apr 2022
19 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
14
03
2022
revised:
14
04
2022
accepted:
15
04
2022
entrez:
20
5
2022
pubmed:
21
5
2022
medline:
21
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background. The maxillary sinus lift is a popular and predictable technique associated with implant-supported rehabilitation of the severely atrophic maxilla. The aim of the present retrospective study was to investigate the effectiveness of transcrestal maxillary sinus augmentation and the graft resorption pattern using different heterologous bone substitutes. Methods. A total of 75 sinus-grafting procedures were performed and 89 implants were placed in 66 patients, 24 males and 42 females, with mean age 67.9 ± 10.64 years (range 43−84 years). Nineteen subjects were smokers. The mean follow-up period was 93.33 ± 54.71 months (range 14−240 months). Clinical and radiographical evaluations were performed. Graft height and width were measured at baseline and at the latest follow-up. Results. Mesiodistal and vertical resorption averaged 9.3 ± 20.7% (standard deviation), and 5.04 ± 9.9% of the postoperative size, respectively, considering the graft as the unit. Linear regression analysis showed that graft resorption in both the vertical and the mesiodistal dimension is independent of the follow-up time. Conversely, there was a trend for greater resorption when increasing the postoperative graft size, in both vertical (p = 0.001) and horizontal (p = 0.007) dimensions. When grouping the dimensional changes by graft particle size (only small (<300 μm) particles, combination of small and medium (>500 μm)/large (>1000 μm) particles, and only medium/large particles), there was a trend for greater resorption associated with smaller particles, but it was not significant; neither in the mesiodistal nor in the vertical dimension (p = 0.17 and p = 0.25, respectively). No implant was lost during the observation period. In conclusion, the transcrestal technique for maxillary sinus augmentation documented a high level of predictability. The low clinical morbidity and the contextual dental implant positioning is clinically useful in relation to a significant reduction of the time required for implant restoration, a consistent decrease of the number of surgical phases, and a cost-effectiveness approach for the rehabilitation. The graft resorption pattern in all cases was compatible with persistent implant protection and support.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35591298
pii: ma15092964
doi: 10.3390/ma15092964
pmc: PMC9102007
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Eur J Oral Sci. 2008 Dec;116(6):497-506
pubmed: 19049518
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2021 Mar 31;12(1):e1
pubmed: 33959236
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Nov/Dec;33(6):1305-1311
pubmed: 30427961
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 May-Jun;21(3):433-8
pubmed: 16796287
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 27;10(21):
pubmed: 34768518
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Aug;64(8):1190-8
pubmed: 16860208
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Jun;15(3):339-45
pubmed: 15142097
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2021 Nov-Dec;41(6):903-910
pubmed: 34818399
Dent Clin North Am. 1986 Apr;30(2):207-29
pubmed: 3516738
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Autumn;3(3):221-32
pubmed: 20847992
Implant Dent. 2006 Jun;15(2):197-207
pubmed: 16766904
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;39(6):274-82
pubmed: 24516817
Biomed J. 2021 Oct;44(5):627-635
pubmed: 34740571
J Periodontol. 2008 Jan;79(1):192-8
pubmed: 18166111
Dent Clin North Am. 2015 Apr;59(2):375-88
pubmed: 25835800
J Craniofac Surg. 1997 Nov;8(6):506-11
pubmed: 9477838
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Mar 01;17(2):e271-5
pubmed: 22143696
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2019 Nov-Dec;33(6 Suppl. 2):85-91. DENTAL SUPPLEMENT
pubmed: 32425028
Oral Dis. 2017 Jan;23(1):55-61
pubmed: 27537271
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013 Nov-Dec;33(6):773-83
pubmed: 24116362
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Apr;51(3):247-52
pubmed: 22766268
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Apr;12(2):135-43
pubmed: 11251663
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jul;20(7):691-700
pubmed: 19453567
J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Sep;27(6):e557-9
pubmed: 27428922
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005 Jul;74(1):448-57
pubmed: 15889429
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Mar/Apr;32(2):e69-e75
pubmed: 28291856
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013 Jul-Aug;33(4):467-75
pubmed: 23820706
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Jan;27(1):126-9
pubmed: 25682786
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jun;48(6):810-823
pubmed: 30442550
J Periodontol. 2021 Feb;92(2):263-272
pubmed: 32715479
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2018 Nov-Dec;22(6):468-473
pubmed: 30631223
J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):241-54
pubmed: 18724853
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Nov-Dec;14(6):835-40
pubmed: 10612920
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Apr 18;19(4):
pubmed: 29670035
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jul;20(7):677-83
pubmed: 19515059
Compendium. 1994 Jun;15(6):698, 700, 702-4 passim; quiz 710
pubmed: 7994726
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2015 Mar-Apr;24(2):341-8
pubmed: 25931369
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Nov 29;:
pubmed: 34857390
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Sep-Oct;15(5):668-74
pubmed: 11055134
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Oct;31(10):959-967
pubmed: 32716570
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 16;15(6):
pubmed: 29914159
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Sep;27(9):1106-22
pubmed: 26452326
Ann Anat. 2019 Nov;226:29-34
pubmed: 31330302
Implant Dent. 2014 Apr;23(2):168-74
pubmed: 24637529
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Oct;130(4):1044-9
pubmed: 16214518
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2018 Jun 28;48(3):174-181
pubmed: 29984047
J Prosthodont. 2010 Aug;19(6):449-57
pubmed: 20546490
Materials (Basel). 2018 Aug 17;11(8):
pubmed: 30126102
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2018 Sep-Oct;32(5):1295-1301
pubmed: 30334429
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2019 Nov-Dec;33(6 Suppl. 2):121-135. DENTAL SUPPLEMENT
pubmed: 32425033
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995 Oct;33(5):312-8
pubmed: 8555150
Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998 Apr;9(2):107-16
pubmed: 9663038
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Feb;31(2):105-120
pubmed: 31532857
J Oral Implantol. 2021 Feb 1;47(1):45-55
pubmed: 32663265
J Oral Implantol. 2015 Dec;41(6):657-61
pubmed: 25232940
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Jun;24(3):361-371
pubmed: 35320619
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1998 Dec;18(6):528-43
pubmed: 10321168