A Retrospective Study of 23 Cases: Are Lichenoid Lesions of the Labial Mucosa Induced?

buccal dermatology clinical research koebner phenomenon lichen planus lip lesions oral lichen planus oral lichenoid lesions

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2022
Historique:
accepted: 15 05 2022
entrez: 20 5 2022
pubmed: 21 5 2022
medline: 21 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Background Lichen planus (LP) is a pathology that affects the skin and the mucosa. The lips are rarely involved but represent a diagnostic challenge in those cases. Oral lichenoid lesions (OLL) are defined as lesions that resemble oral lichen planus (OLP) but do not fully meet the clinical and/or histologic criteria for OLP. This study aimed to present our case series and to study the correlation between the location of the lesion and the dental factor (resin composite, amalgams, crowns, abrasive teeth, and mandibular crossbite) that could cause the lesion. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study of 23 patients with LP/OLL of the lips treated in the Department of Oral Mucosal Pathology of the Department of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital in Paris between January 2017 and February 2021. We noted the location of the lesion (upper, lower, or both lips), medical history, treatments, smoking habits, and the aspect of the teeth facing the lesion. Patients received a local corticoid treatment and were monitored via follow-up. Results Sixteen patients had lesions on the upper lip, two on the lower lip, and five on both lips, and most patients (n = 14, 60.1%) had a dental factor facing the lesion (e.g., abrasive teeth, resin composites, dental crowns, and mandibular crossbite). Six patients received clobetasol propionate, and 15 patients received a preparation combining betamethasone and benzocaine (Orabase, ConvaTec, Deeside, UK). Fourteen patients returned for post-treatment follow-up consultations approximately two months after treatment. Seven patients saw clinical improvement, five had partial improvement, and two had no improvement. Conclusions Lesions of the labial mucosa appear to be a rare condition in LP/OLL. The difference between LP and OLL can be difficult, even with histological analysis. Its pathogenesis remains unknown, although some studies found evidence of lichenoid reactions of the lips in contact with dental composite restorations. In our study, 14 of our patients had a dental factor facing the lesions. However, our study failed to show a correlation between the presence of an inducing factor and the lesion. In a future study, the potential effect of dental inducing factor removal could be studied. This topic requires further investigations, particularly regarding the inducing factor and the optimal therapeutic approach.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35591890
doi: 10.7759/cureus.25012
pmc: PMC9110071
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e25012

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022, Lehner et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2014 Mar;14(2):169-84
pubmed: 24524807
Dermatol Online J. 2012 Feb 15;18(2):14
pubmed: 22398235
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2018 Mar 31;9(1):e5
pubmed: 29707184
Br J Dermatol. 2003 Jan;148(1):70-6
pubmed: 12534597
Int J Dermatol. 2016 Sep;55(9):e473-81
pubmed: 26992292
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2015 Nov;76(11):C170-2
pubmed: 26551509
Arch Dermatol Res. 2016 Oct;308(8):539-51
pubmed: 27349424
Oral Dis. 2005 Nov;11(6):338-49
pubmed: 16269024
Int J Dermatol. 2007 Nov;46 Suppl 3:25-6
pubmed: 17973884
Oral Dis. 2007 Jul;13(4):402-6
pubmed: 17577327
J Oral Pathol Med. 1996 Jul;25(6):311-3
pubmed: 8887075
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:746874
pubmed: 25531004
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2022 Apr;23(2):341-353
pubmed: 35094367
J Oral Sci. 2007 Jun;49(2):89-106
pubmed: 17634721
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2007 Jul-Sep;20(3):631-5
pubmed: 17880776
Dermatol Ther. 2010 May-Jun;23(3):251-67
pubmed: 20597944
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Jun;113(6):766-72
pubmed: 22668704
Acta Clin Croat. 2018 Jun;57(2):342-351
pubmed: 30431729
J Oral Pathol Med. 2005 Sep;34(8):467-72
pubmed: 16091113
Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Mar;149(1):14-27
pubmed: 34238586
Oral Dis. 2009 Apr;15(3):235-43
pubmed: 19222766
Clin Dermatol. 2011 Mar-Apr;29(2):231-6
pubmed: 21396563
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2014 Jul;39(5):563-9
pubmed: 24934909
Br Dent J. 2005 Mar 26;198(6):361-6; disussion 549; quiz 372
pubmed: 15789104
Indian J Dermatol. 2015 Jan-Feb;60(1):102
pubmed: 25657414
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016 Jul;122(1):72-80
pubmed: 27260276
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Feb 1;156(2):172-181
pubmed: 31895418
Oral Dis. 2021 May;27(4):813-828
pubmed: 32144836
Oral Oncol. 2007 Sep;43(8):742-8
pubmed: 17112770
J Oral Pathol Med. 2006 Apr;35(4):233-40
pubmed: 16519771

Auteurs

Jean Lehner (J)

Oral Surgery, Université Paris-Sorbonne, Paris, FRA.

Scarlette Agbo-Godeau (S)

Département de Pathologie de la Muqueuse Buccale, Service de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale et Stomatologie, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, FRA.

Chloé Bertolus (C)

Département de Pathologie de la Muqueuse Buccale, Service de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale et Stomatologie, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, FRA.

Classifications MeSH