Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of lactic acid to reduce microbiological surface contamination on carcases from kangaroos, wild pigs, goats and sheep.
antimicrobial resistance
efficacy
environmental impact
lactic acid
toxicological safety
wild game and small stock carcases
Journal
EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority
ISSN: 1831-4732
Titre abrégé: EFSA J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101642076
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
entrez:
20
5
2022
pubmed:
21
5
2022
medline:
21
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of lactic acid to reduce microbiological surface contamination from carcases of wild game (i.e. kangaroos and wild pigs) and small stock (i.e. goats and sheep) before chilling at the slaughterhouse were assessed. Wild pig and kangaroo hide-on carcases may have been chilled before they arrive at the slaughterhouse and are treated after removal of the hides. Lactic acid solutions (2-5%) are applied to the carcases at temperatures of up to 55°C by spraying or misting. The treatment lasts 6-7 s per carcass side. The Panel concluded that: [1] the treatment is of no safety concern, provided that the lactic acid complies with the European Union specifications for food additives; [2] based on the available evidence, it was not possible to conclude on the efficacy of spraying or misting lactic acid on kangaroo, wild pig, goats and sheep carcases; [3] treatment of the above-mentioned carcases with lactic acid may induce reduced susceptibility to the same substance, but this can be minimised; there is currently no evidence that prior exposure of food-borne pathogens to lactic acid leads to the occurrence of resistance levels that compromise antimicrobial therapy; and [4] the release of lactic acid is not of concern for the environment, assuming that wastewaters released by the slaughterhouses are treated on-site, if necessary, to counter the potentially low pH caused by lactic acid, in compliance with local rules.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35592024
doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7265
pii: EFS27265
pmc: PMC9097752
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e07265Informations de copyright
© 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority.
Références
J Dairy Sci. 2003 Nov;86(11):3605-10
pubmed: 14672191
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
J Food Prot. 2001 Sep;64(9):1439-41
pubmed: 11563525
J Food Prot. 2001 Jan;64(1):58-62
pubmed: 11198442
Nutr Clin Pract. 2005 Dec;20(6):634-45
pubmed: 16306301
Meat Sci. 1979 Apr;3(2):143-57
pubmed: 22055269
Meat Sci. 2005 Apr;69(4):673-80
pubmed: 22063145
Biochem J. 1967 Oct;105(1):127-36
pubmed: 6060444
J Nutr. 2005 Jul;135(7):1619-25
pubmed: 15987839
Medicine (Baltimore). 1998 Mar;77(2):73-82
pubmed: 9556700
Proc Nutr Soc. 1976 May;35(1):27A
pubmed: 940818
EFSA J. 2018 Dec 12;16(12):e05482
pubmed: 32625776
J Food Prot. 1997 Jun;60(6):619-624
pubmed: 31195555
Meat Sci. 2004 Apr;66(4):817-21
pubmed: 22061013
Vet Q. 1985 Oct;7(4):277-82
pubmed: 4071948
Genes (Basel). 2021 Mar 25;12(4):
pubmed: 33806186
Meat Sci. 2014 Feb;96(2 Pt B):1034-9
pubmed: 23102639
Clin Biochem. 2008 Sep;41(13):1099-103
pubmed: 18638467
Meat Sci. 2005 Mar;69(3):401-7
pubmed: 22062977
J Food Prot. 2005 Oct;68(10):2047-53
pubmed: 16245706
EFSA J. 2022 May 12;20(5):e07265
pubmed: 35592024
EFSA J. 2017 Aug 03;15(8):e04970
pubmed: 32625631