Scaling out a palliative compassionate community innovation: Nav-CARE.
community
hospice
navigation
palliative
volunteer
Journal
Palliative care and social practice
ISSN: 2632-3524
Titre abrégé: Palliat Care Soc Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101754997
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
17
12
2021
accepted:
31
03
2022
entrez:
20
5
2022
pubmed:
21
5
2022
medline:
21
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is an urgent need for community-based interventions that can be scaled up to meet the growing demand for palliative care. The purpose of this study was to scale out a volunteer navigation intervention called Nav-CARE by replicating the program in multiple contexts and evaluating feasibility, acceptability, sustainability, and impact. This was a scale-out implementation and mixed-method evaluation study. Nav-CARE was implemented in 12 hospice and 3 nonhospice community-based organizations spanning five provinces in Canada. Volunteers visited clients in the home approximately every 2 weeks for 1 year with some modifications required by the COVID-19 public health restrictions. Qualitative evaluation data were collected from key informants ( Successful implementation was influenced by organizational capacity, stable and engaged leadership, a targeted client population, and skillful messaging. Recruitment of clients was the most significant barrier to implementation. Clients reported statistically significant improvements in feeling they had someone to turn to, knowing the services available to help them in their community, being involved in things that were important to them, and having confidence in taking care of their illness. Improvements in clients' quality of life were reported in the qualitative data, although no statistically significant gains were reported on the quality of life measure. Volunteers reported good self-efficacy and satisfaction in their role. The feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability of the program were largely dependent on strong intraorganizational leadership. Volunteers reported that their involvement in Nav-CARE enabled them to engage in ongoing learning and have a meaningful and relational role with clients. Clients and families described the positive impact of a volunteer on their engagement and quality of life.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
There is an urgent need for community-based interventions that can be scaled up to meet the growing demand for palliative care. The purpose of this study was to scale out a volunteer navigation intervention called Nav-CARE by replicating the program in multiple contexts and evaluating feasibility, acceptability, sustainability, and impact.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
This was a scale-out implementation and mixed-method evaluation study. Nav-CARE was implemented in 12 hospice and 3 nonhospice community-based organizations spanning five provinces in Canada. Volunteers visited clients in the home approximately every 2 weeks for 1 year with some modifications required by the COVID-19 public health restrictions. Qualitative evaluation data were collected from key informants (
Findings
UNASSIGNED
Successful implementation was influenced by organizational capacity, stable and engaged leadership, a targeted client population, and skillful messaging. Recruitment of clients was the most significant barrier to implementation. Clients reported statistically significant improvements in feeling they had someone to turn to, knowing the services available to help them in their community, being involved in things that were important to them, and having confidence in taking care of their illness. Improvements in clients' quality of life were reported in the qualitative data, although no statistically significant gains were reported on the quality of life measure. Volunteers reported good self-efficacy and satisfaction in their role.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
The feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability of the program were largely dependent on strong intraorganizational leadership. Volunteers reported that their involvement in Nav-CARE enabled them to engage in ongoing learning and have a meaningful and relational role with clients. Clients and families described the positive impact of a volunteer on their engagement and quality of life.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35592240
doi: 10.1177/26323524221095102
pii: 10.1177_26323524221095102
pmc: PMC9112317
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
26323524221095102Informations de copyright
© The Author(s), 2022.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Can J Aging. 2021 Oct 20;:1-11
pubmed: 34666866
Health Promot Int. 2020 Feb 1;35(1):160-170
pubmed: 30690474
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Sep;26(9):3163-3172
pubmed: 29594487
BMC Med. 2016 Dec 9;14(1):203
pubmed: 27931214
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 1;17(1):514
pubmed: 28764687
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Jul 3;17(1):2
pubmed: 28673300
Rural Remote Health. 2020 Oct;20(4):6112
pubmed: 33035426
CMAJ. 2019 May 6;191(18):E491-E500
pubmed: 31061074
Rural Remote Health. 2011;11(3):1733
pubmed: 21787109
QJM. 2013 Dec;106(12):1071-5
pubmed: 24082152
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 May 22;19(1):72
pubmed: 32443979
Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33
pubmed: 8628042
Palliat Support Care. 2014 Apr;12(2):127-38
pubmed: 23510757
Qual Life Res. 2009 Aug;18(6):727-35
pubmed: 19424821
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2014 Dec;31(8):836-44
pubmed: 24037541
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2021 Oct 6;15:26323524211032984
pubmed: 34647028
Ann Palliat Med. 2018 Apr;7(Suppl 2):S118-S129
pubmed: 29764178
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jan 15;15:5
pubmed: 26772180
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Aug;60(2):449-459.e21
pubmed: 32201310
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
Am J Prev Med. 2009 May;36(5):452-7
pubmed: 19362699
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Aug;38(8):963-971
pubmed: 33030044
Implement Sci. 2013 Feb 01;8:15
pubmed: 23375082
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 May;35(5):780-787
pubmed: 29129107
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):42
pubmed: 33413394
Palliat Med. 2016 Mar;30(3):200-11
pubmed: 26269324
J Palliat Med. 2012 May;15(5):567-72
pubmed: 22533345
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Jun 5;16(1):37
pubmed: 28583176
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2018 Jun;8(2):145-154
pubmed: 29305499
BMC Med Ethics. 2011 Sep 28;12:19
pubmed: 21955451
Can J Aging. 2016 Jun;35(2):206-14
pubmed: 27093177
CMAJ. 2009 Jun 9;180(12):1185, E88-9
pubmed: 19506272