Effect of testing protocol and within-pen prevalence on the detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae DNA in oral fluid samples.


Journal

Preventive veterinary medicine
ISSN: 1873-1716
Titre abrégé: Prev Vet Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8217463

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2022
Historique:
received: 14 12 2021
revised: 01 05 2022
accepted: 09 05 2022
pubmed: 21 5 2022
medline: 9 6 2022
entrez: 20 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Combinations of 2 nucleic acid extractions and 3 Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (MHP) PCRs (namely Protocol 1, 2, 3, and 4) were compared in terms of the probability of detecting DNA in pen-based oral fluid samples as a function of within-pen MHP prevalence. Oral fluid samples were created by randomly assigning 39 7-week old pigs to one of 5 pens, i.e., negative control pen (3 pigs) and 4 pens of 9 pigs each that differed in the proportion of MHP-inoculated pigs (1, 3, 6, or 9). Deep tracheal swabs were collected twice weekly to establish individual pig MHP infection status and derive within-pen prevalence estimation. On DPI 3, tracheal swabs from 15 of 19 inoculated pigs were MHP DNA positive. Oral fluids (n = 320) were collected daily from - 4 to 59 days post inoculation (DPI). Using a piecewise exponential model to account for within-pen transmission dynamics followed by a mixed-effect logistic regression, the probability of detecting MHP DNA in oral fluids was positively associated with within-pen prevalence (P < 0.0001) and differed among test protocols. MHP DNA was detected in 173 oral fluid samples with Protocol 3 versus 148, 134, and 101 with Protocols 4, 2, and 1, respectively. At 100% within-pen prevalence, the probability of detecting MHP DNA in oral fluids was highest using Protocol 3 (95.7%), followed by Protocols 4 (70.1%), 2 (60.1%), and 1 (34.0%). The fact that PCR protocols performed differently suggests that further improvements in extraction methods and MHP PCRs are possible. In the field, the dynamics of MHP infections should be taken into account if using oral fluid samples in surveillance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35594605
pii: S0167-5877(22)00103-9
doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105670
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105670

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ana Paula S Poeta Silva (APSP)

Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA. Electronic address: apsilva@iastate.edu.

Gabriel Y Storino (GY)

São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.

Franco S Matias Ferreyra (FSM)

Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

Min Zhang (M)

Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA; Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

Jessica M Miller (JM)

Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

Karen M Harmon (KM)

Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

Phillip C Gauger (PC)

Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

Wendy Witbeck (W)

IDEXX Laboratories Inc., Westbrook, ME, USA.

Kent Doolittle (K)

IDEXX Laboratories Inc., Westbrook, ME, USA.

Silvia Zimmerman (S)

IDEXX Laboratories Inc., Westbrook, ME, USA.

Chong Wang (C)

Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA; Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

Rachel J Derscheid (RJ)

Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

Maria J Clavijo (MJ)

Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA; Pig Improvement Company, PIC®, Hendersonville, TN, USA.

Bailey L Arruda (BL)

Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA; US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA, USA.

Jeffrey J Zimmerman (JJ)

Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH