Using the Structure of Evaluative Components as a basis for comparing the oral narratives of schizophrenics and healthy individuals.
Evaluative components
Language
Narrative
Schizophrenia
Journal
Journal of psycholinguistic research
ISSN: 1573-6555
Titre abrégé: J Psycholinguist Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0333506
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
accepted:
29
04
2022
pubmed:
21
5
2022
medline:
9
6
2022
entrez:
20
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In this study, evaluative language in narratives of 15 healthy and 15 schizophrenic females was compared using the Structure of Evaluative Components. The two groups were matched for chronological age and socioeconomic status. A movie named "The Pear Film" ( http://chafe.faculty.linguistics.ucsb.edu/pearfilm.htm ) was used to elicit the narratives. The Goal evaluative component in the schizophrenic population and the Ownership in healthy individuals were used more than other components within the narratives of each respective group. Significant differences (Mann-Whitney and t-test) between the two groups in using evaluative components were determined using statistical analysis. In general, patients used less evaluative components in their narratives compared to healthy participants and as per specific components, healthy subjects utilized five evaluative components more than patients, which was found to be a significant difference; Goal, Assumption, Ownership, Metaphor, and Causality were those five components. These findings confirm that the ability to use evaluative language in schizophrenia is reduced.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35596049
doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09888-2
pii: 10.1007/s10936-022-09888-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
655-677Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association
doi: 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
Andreasen, N. C. (1979). Thought, language, and communication disorders. I. Clinical assessment, definition of terms, and evaluation of their reliability. Archives Of General Psychiatry, 36(12), 1315–1321
doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1979.01780120045006
Bamberg, M., & Damrad-Frye, R. (1991). On the ability to provide evaluative comments: further explorations of childrens narrative competencies. Journal of Child Language, 18(3), 689–710. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000900011314
doi: 10.1017/s0305000900011314
Barra, A. F., Mac-Kay, A. P. M. G., & Lara, E. D. (2018). Narrative evaluation strategies as metacognitive task in subjects with schizophrenia. CoDAS, 30(3), doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20182017084
Bozikas, V., Giannakou, M., Kosmidis, M., Kargopoulos, P., Kioseoglou, G., Liolios, D., & Garyfallos, G. (2011). Insights into theory of mind in schizophrenia: The impact of cognitive impairment. Schizophrenia Research, 130(1–3), 130–136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2011.04.025
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.04.025
Chafe, W. (1980). The pear stories, cognitive, and linguistic aspect of narrative production. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation
Chaika, E., & Lambe, R. A. (1989). Cohesion in schizophrenic narratives, revisited. Journal of Communication Disorders, 22(6), 407–421. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9924(89)90034-8
doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(89)90034-8
Chakrabarty, M., Sarkar, S., Chatterjee, A., Ghosal, M., Guha, P., & Deogaonkar, M. (2014). Metaphor comprehension deficit in schizophrenia with reference to the hypothesis of abnormal lateralization and right hemisphere dysfunction. Language Sciences, 44, 1–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.01.002
doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.01.002
Clore, G. L., Ortony, A., & Foss, M. A. (1987). The psychological foundations of the affective lexicon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(4), 751–766. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.751
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.751
Corrigan, P. W., & Green, M. F. (1993). Schizophrenic patients sensitivity to social cues: the role of abstraction. (1993). American Journal of Psychiatry, 150(4), 589–594. doi: https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.150.4.589
doi: 10.1176/ajp.150.4.589
Covington, M. A., He, C., Brown, C., Naçi, L., Mcclain, J. T., Fjordbak, B. S. … Brown, J. (2005). Schizophrenia and the structure of language: The linguists view. Schizophrenia Research, 77(1), 85–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2005.01.016
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2005.01.016
Danion, J. M., Rizzo, L., & Bruant, A. (1999). Functional mechanisms underlying impaired recognition memory and conscious awareness in patients with schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56(7), 639–644. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.56.7.639
doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.7.639
De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2015). The handbook of narrative analysis. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell
Delisi, L. E. (2001). Speech disorder in schizophrenia: review of the literature and exploration of its relation to the uniquely human capacity for language
Elvevag, B., Helsen, K., Hert, M. D., Sweers, K., & Storms, G. (2011). Metaphor interpretation and use: A window into semantics in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 133(1–3), 205–211. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2011.07.009
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.07.009
Harrington, L., Siegert, R., & Mcclure, J. (2005). Theory of mind in schizophrenia: A critical review. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 10(4), 249–286. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1354680044400005
doi: 10.1080/1354680044400005
Herman, D., Jahn, M., & Ryan, M. L. (2010). Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory. New York: Routledge
doi: 10.4324/9780203932896
Hooker, C., Roese, N. J., & Park, S. (2000). Impoverished counterfactual thinking is associated with Schizophrenia. Psychiatry, 63(4), 326–335. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.2000.11024925
doi: 10.1080/00332747.2000.11024925
Huhn, P. (2008). Functions and forms of eventfulness in narrative fiction. In J. Pier, J. García, & Landa (Eds.), Theorizing Narrativity (pp. 141–163). Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110969801.141
doi: 10.1515/9783110969801.141
Huhn, P. (2013). Event and eventfulness. In P. Huhn, et al. (Eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University
Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAF textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13(3), 239–256. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90004-3
doi: 10.1016/0889-4906(94)90004-3
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press
Li, X., Hu, D., Deng, W., Tao, Q., Hu, Y., Yang, X. … Zhang, X. (2017). Pragmatic ability deficit in schizophrenia and associated Theory of Mind and executive function. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02164
Marini, A., Spoletini, I., Rubino, I. A., Ciuffa, M., Bria, P., Martinotti, G. … Spalletta, G. (2008). The language of schizophrenia: An analysis of micro and macrolinguistic abilities and their neuropsychological correlates. Schizophrenia Research, 105(1–3), 144–155. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2008.07.011
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.07.011
Naghzgoyekohan, M., & Maleki, S. (2018). Possession Schemas in Persian. Journal of Researches in Linguistics, 11(1), 33–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.22108/jrl.2018.111303.1218
doi: 10.22108/jrl.2018.111303.1218
Nieminen, L., & Takkinen, R. (2011). Evaluative language in spoken and signed stories told by a deaf child with a cochlear implant: words, signs or paralinguistic expressions? Eesti Ja Soome-Ugri Keeleteaduse Ajakiri Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics, 2(2), 137–157. doi: https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2011.2.2.07
doi: 10.12697/jeful.2011.2.2.07
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Foss, M. A. (1987). The referential structure of the affective lexicon. Cognitive Science, 11(3), 341–364. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1103_4
doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1103_4
Peterson, C., & Mccabe, A. (1983). Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a child’s narrative. New York: Plenum Press
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-0608-6
Prince, G. (1982). Narratology the form and functioning of narrative. Berlin: Mouton
doi: 10.1515/9783110838626
Rossetti, I., Brambilla, P., & Papagno, C. (2018). Metaphor comprehension in schizophrenic patients. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00670
Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2015). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry: behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry (11th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer
Shiro, M. (2003). Genre and evaluation in narrative development. Journal of Child Language, 30(1), 165–195. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000902005500
doi: 10.1017/s0305000902005500
Skelton, J. (1997). The representation of truth in academic medical writing. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 121–140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.121
doi: 10.1093/applin/18.2.121
Sprong, M., Schothorst, P., Vos, E., Hox, J., & Van Engeland, H. (2007). Theory of mind in schizophrenia: Meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 191(1), 5–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.107.035899
doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.035899
Tavano, A., Sponda, S., Fabbro, F., Perlini, C., Rambaldelli, G., Ferro, A. … Brambilla, P. (2008). Specific linguistic and pragmatic deficits in Italian patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 102(1–3), 53–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2008.02.008
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.02.008
Tschacher, W., & Zeno, K. (2006). Perception of causality in schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32(1), 106–112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbl018
doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbl018
Zwosta, K., Ruge, H., & Wolfensteller, U. (2015). Neural mechanisms of goal-directed behavior: Outcome-based response selection is associated with increased functional coupling of the angular gyrus. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00180