The use of out-of-hours primary care during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.
After-hours care
COVID-19
Electronic health records
Health services
Primary health care
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 May 2022
21 May 2022
Historique:
received:
23
12
2021
accepted:
09
05
2022
entrez:
21
5
2022
pubmed:
22
5
2022
medline:
25
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In the Netherlands, General Practitioners (GP) are usually the first point of contact with a health professional for most health problems. Out-of-hours (OOH) primary care is provided by regional OOH services. Changes in consultation rates at OOH services may be regarded as a warning system for failures elsewhere in the healthcare system. Therefore in this study, we investigated how the COVID-19 pandemic changed the use of primary care OOH services during the first year of the pandemic. Routine electronic health records data were used from 60% of OOH services in the Netherlands, collected by the Nivel Primary Care Database. We compared consultation rates per week (2020) for COVID-19-like symptoms and other health problems (e.g. small traumas, urinary tract infections), for different age groups, the proportion of remote consultations, and different levels of urgency during the pandemic compared to the same period in 2019. The number of consultations for COVID-19-like symptoms peaked at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, while consultations for other health problems decreased. These changes in consultation rates differed between age groups. Remote consultations took place more frequently for all health problems, while the proportion of non-urgent health problems increased. There were significant changes in the number of consultations and the proportion that were remote for COVID-19-like symptoms and other health problems. Especially care for babies and young children decreased, while the number of consultations for older adults remained stable. The continued use of OOH services by older adults suggests there were unmet care needs elsewhere in our healthcare system.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In the Netherlands, General Practitioners (GP) are usually the first point of contact with a health professional for most health problems. Out-of-hours (OOH) primary care is provided by regional OOH services. Changes in consultation rates at OOH services may be regarded as a warning system for failures elsewhere in the healthcare system. Therefore in this study, we investigated how the COVID-19 pandemic changed the use of primary care OOH services during the first year of the pandemic.
METHODS
METHODS
Routine electronic health records data were used from 60% of OOH services in the Netherlands, collected by the Nivel Primary Care Database. We compared consultation rates per week (2020) for COVID-19-like symptoms and other health problems (e.g. small traumas, urinary tract infections), for different age groups, the proportion of remote consultations, and different levels of urgency during the pandemic compared to the same period in 2019.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The number of consultations for COVID-19-like symptoms peaked at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, while consultations for other health problems decreased. These changes in consultation rates differed between age groups. Remote consultations took place more frequently for all health problems, while the proportion of non-urgent health problems increased.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
There were significant changes in the number of consultations and the proportion that were remote for COVID-19-like symptoms and other health problems. Especially care for babies and young children decreased, while the number of consultations for older adults remained stable. The continued use of OOH services by older adults suggests there were unmet care needs elsewhere in our healthcare system.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35597939
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08096-x
pii: 10.1186/s12913-022-08096-x
pmc: PMC9122805
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
679Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
BJGP Open. 2020 Aug 25;4(3):
pubmed: 32487520
Euro Surveill. 2021 Jul;26(29):
pubmed: 34296672
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 17;10(6):e039674
pubmed: 32554730
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 May;4(5):e10-e11
pubmed: 32278365
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Dec 5;21(1):255
pubmed: 33278877
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0237629
pubmed: 32790804
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 May 12;18(1):62
pubmed: 28499354
Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 03;9:623904
pubmed: 33614587
Fam Pract. 2002 Oct;19(5):433-5
pubmed: 12356688
Health Syst Transit. 2016 Mar;18(2):1-240
pubmed: 27467715
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 May;68(5):926-929
pubmed: 32255507
Ann Intern Med. 2017 May 16;166(10):737-742
pubmed: 28418455
Ann Fam Med. 2021 Jan-Feb;19(1):44-47
pubmed: 33431391
BMJ. 2020 Mar 9;368:m959
pubmed: 32152010
Can Geriatr J. 2020 Mar 01;23(1):155-159
pubmed: 32550954
BMJ. 2020 Mar 30;368:m1279
pubmed: 32229477
BMJ. 2020 Mar 25;368:m1182
pubmed: 32213507
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Jul;32(7):1199-1202
pubmed: 32390064
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Jun 09;15:114
pubmed: 24912378
J Interprof Care. 2020 Sep-Oct;34(5):672-678
pubmed: 32962462
Fam Pract. 2010 Apr;27(2):129-34
pubmed: 20032165
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Dec 11;30(6):1049-1055
pubmed: 32810204
N Z Med J. 2020 Apr 24;133(1513):8-10
pubmed: 32325463