Intraoperative Motor Evoked Responses to Double-Train Paradigm Stimulation for Guiding Lead Placement and Postoperative Programming in Spinal Cord Stimulation for Pain.
General anesthesia
intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring
mapping
pain
spinal cord stimulation
Journal
Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society
ISSN: 1525-1403
Titre abrégé: Neuromodulation
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9804159
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
29
12
2021
revised:
14
02
2022
accepted:
06
03
2022
pubmed:
23
5
2022
medline:
11
1
2023
entrez:
22
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of using motor evoked responses to intraoperative double-train stimulation to guide lead placement and matching of intraoperative contacts with postoperative electrode programming in spinal cord stimulation for pain performed under general anesthesia. The study included a series of 20 consecutive patients with refractory pain operated on under general anesthesia. Either percutaneous or paddle leads were implanted and positioned according to the intraoperative mapping results. Neurophysiologic mapping was performed with a double-train stimulation paradigm (intertrain interval of 60 milliseconds, three to five cathodal pulses with 0.5-millisecond pulse duration, and within-train interstimulus intervals of 2-4 milliseconds). The sites where dorsal column responses of the targeted dermatomes were detected were considered optimal for lead placement (intraoperative best contacts). Following spinal cord stimulator (SCS) lead placement, blinded postoperative programming of electrode contacts was matched with the intraoperative best contacts and the pain-paresthesia overlap for the trial phase. A binominal test was used as a statistical method; pre- and postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) after three months was obtained. A total of 15 patients underwent spinal cord stimulation trial for intractable pain. Of these, ten patients (66%) had a successful trial and received permanent implants; one patient had a successful trial but was never intended to be implanted because of her poor health condition; four patients (26%) had an unsuccessful trial, leading to trial electrode explantation; and five patients had already had an implant with percutaneous leads and therefore underwent electrode revision, of whom four patients received paddle leads. In 18 of the 20 operated patients (90%), we found a match between the best intraoperative contacts and the postoperatively programmed contacts (significantly better than chance, p = 8.2 × 10 In this proof-of-concept study, we were able to demonstrate that SCS lead placement using a double-train stimulation paradigm performed under general anesthesia is a safe and feasible technique, offering reliable prediction of contacts for postoperative programming and excellent pain-paresthesia coverage.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35599160
pii: S1094-7159(22)00646-8
doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.03.009
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
147-156Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 International Neuromodulation Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.