Standardization of rounds on a general paediatric ward: Implementation of a checklist to improve efficiency, quality of rounds, and family satisfaction.
Bedside rounds
Checklist
Communication
Patient safety
Rounding tool
Teaching rounds
Journal
Paediatrics & child health
ISSN: 1205-7088
Titre abrégé: Paediatr Child Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815960
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
received:
22
02
2021
accepted:
20
07
2021
entrez:
23
5
2022
pubmed:
24
5
2022
medline:
24
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to develop a standardized rounding tool for use on the general paediatric ward and to determine if its use can improve quality of rounds as well as patient and parent satisfaction. The study used a pre- and post-intervention prospective observational methodology. The intervention consisted of the implementation of a Checklist Rounding Tool (CRT) entitled the 'Paediatric Inpatient Rounding Checklist (PIRC)' which outlined items deemed essential to discuss during rounds for all patients admitted to the paediatric ward. The PIRC was created by the research team after reviewing the literature and it was peer reviewed by a panel of expert paediatricians. Performance on rounds based on discussion of checklist items as well as patient and parent satisfaction were evaluated by an external observer both pre- and post-PIRC implementation. Four of the five less frequently addressed checklist items were discussed significantly more post-intervention. The Rounds Quality Score was significantly improved after checklist implementation, the pre- and post-intervention scores being 8.24 and 9.61/10, respectively (P-value <0.001). Patient and parent satisfaction were rated higher with the use of the checklist. There was no difference in the duration of rounds between the pre- and post-implementation phases. In summary, utilization of a standardized rounding tool on an inpatient paediatric ward led to improvement in quality of rounds as well as patient and parent satisfaction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35599681
doi: 10.1093/pch/pxab080
pii: pxab080
pmc: PMC9113846
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
111-117Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Canadian Paediatric Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Crit Care. 2012 Feb 22;16(1):305
pubmed: 22353202
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014 Feb;40(2):83-90
pubmed: 24716331
Pediatrics. 2017 May;139(5):
pubmed: 28557720
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):921-928
pubmed: 26628552
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):438-47
pubmed: 24081019
An Pediatr (Barc). 2017 Oct;87(4):191-200
pubmed: 28139411
J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Dec;31(6):1313-1320
pubmed: 27757740
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2017 Nov 17;2(6):e044
pubmed: 30229180
Am J Med Qual. 2015 Sep-Oct;30(5):493
pubmed: 26180126
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2019 May 16;4(3):e176
pubmed: 31579875
J Hosp Med. 2015 Jan;10(1):36-40
pubmed: 25399928
Crit Care. 2013 Oct 11;17(5):R232
pubmed: 24479381
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Jun;28(3):371-5
pubmed: 27090399