The pandemic and the question of national belonging: Exposure to covid-19 threat and conceptions of nationhood.

Covid‐19 affective intelligence theory behavioural immune system hypothesis conceptions of nationhood pandemic threat

Journal

European journal of political research
ISSN: 0304-4130
Titre abrégé: Eur J Polit Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101092768

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Feb 2022
Historique:
received: 21 04 2021
revised: 04 08 2021
accepted: 09 09 2021
entrez: 23 5 2022
pubmed: 24 5 2022
medline: 24 5 2022
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Drawing on the behavioural immune system hypothesis, we argue that the prevalence of the Covid-19 pandemic threat in an individual's respective environment relates to exclusive, ethnic conceptions of nationhood. Referring to the affective intelligence theory, we maintain that specific negative emotions are prompted by the perception of being exposed to a pandemic threat, and these emotional states in turn structure political preferences regarding national belonging. Using an original survey in six European countries during the first peak of the pandemic in late April and early May 2020, we analyze both the impact of individual Covid-19 experiences and the contextual exposure to a pandemic threat through hierarchical analyses of 105 European regions. Our empirical analysis shows that exposure to the pandemic is linked to stronger ethnic national identities for both levels of analysis. We also find that anger substantially mediates this relationship and has primacy over feelings of fear. Taken together, our results indicate that the behavioural immune system appears as a pervasive obstacle to inclusive orientations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35600257
doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12515
pii: EJPR12515
pmc: PMC9111324
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Political Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Consortium for Political Research.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

Br J Clin Psychol. 2004 Sep;43(Pt 3):245-65
pubmed: 15333231
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70
pubmed: 3397865
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Apr;35(2):99-119
pubmed: 22486004
Psychol Sci. 2020 Oct;31(10):1211-1221
pubmed: 32942965
Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar;135(2):303-21
pubmed: 19254082
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2004 Apr;123(4):371-89
pubmed: 15022365
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 25;10:2412
pubmed: 31708846
Int J Public Health. 2020 Jul;65(6):747-754
pubmed: 32728852
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471
pubmed: 32355299
Br J Soc Psychol. 2013 Mar;52(1):83-102
pubmed: 21883298
Psychol Methods. 2010 Sep;15(3):209-33
pubmed: 20822249
Top Cogn Sci. 2016 Jan;8(1):98-117
pubmed: 26612490

Auteurs

Steffen Wamsler (S)

Institute of Political Science University of Bern Switzerland.

Markus Freitag (M)

Institute of Political Science University of Bern Switzerland.

Julian Erhardt (J)

Institute of Political Science University of Bern Switzerland.

Maximilian Filsinger (M)

Institute of Political Science University of Bern Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH